[compost_tea] Re: Water voodoo?

From: dkemnitz2000 <dkemnitz2000_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 01:57:52 -0000

--- Dave , Why assume the macro scale forms independent of the micro
(a mole or less) scale ? Dennis





In compost_tea_at_yahoogroups.com, David Anderson <squtch@g...> wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 12:24:27 +1300, L Blair <rlbct_at_c...> wrote:
> > volts in a pool of water?  well I havn't measured it myself, but
the charge
> > is at the atomic level.  spin the vortex one way and its
positively charged,
> > negative the other way.  I don't understand it tho.  (as you may
know, BD
> > stirring involves alternating the direction frequently).
>
> I was going to keep quiet on the structure issue (though ice is the
> only structure that I know of in pure water that lasts more than
> nanoseconds) until I heard more, but you are either being
snookered by
> someone on this vortex and charge change issue or you
misunderstood.
>
> It sounds like someone pulled a few terms from a PBS special on
> physics or weather and decided to apply it to water in a bucket
> without understanding what they were talking about.
>
> If there is any electric potential, it would be a vertical
difference,
> or horizontal from near the vortex to a spot away from the vortex.
It
> would not change according to the direction that it is spinning,
> because the atomic scale particals don't know up from down, left
from
> right on a macro scale.
>
> Dave




Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
click here


Yahoo! Groups Links

Received on Thu Dec 09 2004 - 22:59:30 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Feb 07 2012 - 14:15:38 EST