[compost_tea] Re: Water voodoo?
This thread seems to be taking a confrontational direction, and I'm
not sure why. The wonderful proponents of BD and Emoto have had and
continue to have successes based on the energy properties of water.
I'm not sure anyone really cares to "enlighten" when the tone is
clearly confrontational.
Don't believe it? Don't practice those concepts!
Didn't read Emoto's work? Then there is no discussion, just flippant
quips.
Personally I'll use flow forms and continue to find Emoto of value. I
would never buy or recommend a brewer that doesn't vortex water.
Science is lacking but so is the data and science on the uses of ACT.
That doesn't negate our successes.
--- In compost_tea_at_yahoogroups.com, David Anderson <squtch@g...>
wrote:
> Well, I haven't read it, but if you have read the section on how
this
> works, as you say 5 or 6 times, you should have an understanding of
> it.
>
> Please enlighten me.
>
> No one else seems to want to come forward with any supporting
information.
>
> I am in no way claiming that the results of this process don't work.
> But unless you show me either a reasonable explanation or testing
data
> that supports it, the the explanation of what led to the results, is
> as Bob said "water voodoo".
>
> Dave
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor |
ADVERTISEMENT
 | |
 |
Yahoo! Groups Links
Received on Fri Dec 10 2004 - 11:13:57 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Tue Feb 07 2012 - 14:15:38 EST