[compost_tea] Dave WAS ::Re: Water voodoo?

From: dkemnitz2000 <dkemnitz2000_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 23:22:45 -0000

--- In compost_tea_at_yahoogroups.com, David Anderson <squtch@g...>
wrote:
> Dennis,
>
> I think you are confusing two different things that I was talking
about.
>
> When talking about "structured pure water", I could find nothing
> credible that supports any sort of claim that other than ice, water
> will form any sort of structure other than increibly weak bond that
> last for incredibly short periods of time.
>
> I'm not suggesting that something on a macro scale will not work
the
> same as something on a mole scale. A mole is an incredibly huge
amount
> of material. I am talking about individual particles. The particles
> that hold a charge are molecule or smaller.
>
>

<><><><<><><<<>SO DAVE you're defining micro as molecules,
electrons, protons,etc and one molecular weight(mole) as macro. OK
by me I didn't know.  Does water get heavier when it gains an
electron? I never weighed one electron. Dennis




What causes the electron to get ripped away from a molecule? And will
> the direction that the water is spinning cause that water to have
an
> electron added instead of pulled away?
>
> Suggesting that stirring the water in different directions will
give a
> different charge makes as much sense as suggesting that rubbing a
> glass rod with wool in one direction will give it a positive charge
> and rubbing it in the oposite direction will give it a negative
> charge. It simply does not work that way.
>
> My guess is that someone read something about particle spin, snd
> somehoe extrapolated that into stirring in different directions.
>
> And this is all ignoring the fact that you will never maintain a
> potential of 100kV in a conducting liquid.
>
> While I can accept that some of these actions might have a positive
> effect, the explanation is flawed.
>
> Dave
>
>
> On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 01:57:52 -0000, dkemnitz2000
<dkemnitz2000_at_y...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- Dave , Why assume the macro scale forms independent of the
micro
> > (a mole or less) scale ? Dennis




Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
click here


Yahoo! Groups Links

Received on Fri Dec 10 2004 - 19:07:24 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Feb 07 2012 - 14:15:38 EST