[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: fHuman vs. natural influences on the environment
tomgray <tomgray@igc.apc.org> wrote:
>All locked up and nowhere to go <cage@critech.com> wrote:
>>The numbers are in the same ballpark? Really? This is news to me.
>>Stabilizing emissions at 1990 levels would not be extremely difficult.
>>It was my impression that reducing them to the point where they are
>>equal to the sinks is quite another matter. It is always the first
>>increment that is easiest and cheapest to get, and the last fraction
>>is horribly difficult and expensive.
>
>Hmmmm. Well, I don't seem to have the numbers handy, but the source
>is a report from IPCC Working Group II released in November of last
>year. The working group provided five scenarios for "deep reductions
>of CO2 emissions" and said "[W]ithin the wide range of future energy
>prices, one or more of the [scenarios] would plausibly be capable of
>providing the demanded energy services at estimated costs that are
>approximately the same as estimated future costs for current >conventional energy." More is available in the FAQ section of our
>Web site at http://www.econet.org/awea .
Oops, my mistake, I read too hastily. The "deep reductions" consist
of a 2/3 cut in CO2 emissions, from roughly 22 billion tons/year
worldwide today to 7 billion tons/year by 2100. The scenarios
allow for population growth from 5.3 billion today to 10.5 billion
in 2100, and project economic growth to 25 times 1990 levels by 2100.
I trust this will give some idea of the degree to which economic
wellbeing is *NOT* dependent on continued emissions of carbon
dioxide.
Tom Gray
Director of Communications
American Wind Energy Association
PS Support renewable energy! Visit the Electronic Lobbyist For
Renewable Energy Web Site:
http://www.netcom.com/~stevie2/budget.html
Interested in energy and the environment? The free electronic
edition of _Wind Energy Weekly_ reports on energy-related
environmental issues, energy policy, and wind industry trade
news. The electronic edition normally runs about 10kb in length.
For a subscription, send me an e-mail request. Please include
information on your position, organization, and reason for
interest in the publication.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Gray <tomgray@econet.org>
Follow-Ups:
References: