[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: I will no longer respond to barks from the kennel.
In article <32889C11.6C6F@ilhawaii.net> Jay Hanson <jhanson@ilhawaii.net> writes:
> charliew wrote:
>
> > you're taking up a lot of bandwidth with this crap. We've
> > all had ample opportunity to learn of your opinion about the
> > connection between entropy and food production. Many of us
> > are not convinced, no matter how many times you post your
> > same senseless, extremely long document.
>
> charliew, PLEASE DO NOT READ ANYTHING I WRITE!
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> PLEASE PUT ME IN YOUR KILLFILE!
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> My posts are not indended for our four-footed-friends.
>
> I will no longer respond to barks from the kennel.
>
> That includes you, jw, Harold and McCarthy -- so far.
>
> Jay
I am unable to accede to Jay Hanson's request that I not comment on
his posts. When I read a post that I consider mistaken, I respond to
it for what I imagine to be the benefit of the audience. Sometimes it
benefits the poster, but I am ready to give up on Jay Hanson changing
his mind on anything.
There is one way Hanson can reduce the number of replies I make to his
posts. When he posts a document he has posted before, he should note
that fact and note who replied to a previous posting. I would then
often skip the opportunity to reply to the same document again.
--
John McCarthy, Computer Science Department, Stanford, CA 94305
http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/progress/
During the last years of the Second Millenium, the Earthmen complained
a lot.
Follow-Ups: