[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Economists on ecology (Re: GOODBY MIKE!)
Robert Vogel (vogel@mail.snet.net) wrote:
: Jay Hanson wrote:
: > BTW, even your SE is defective because you left out the laws
: > of thermodynamics. In fact, we are on a one-way trip -- and
: > running out of energy.
: >
: > Jay -- http://csf.Colorado.EDU/authors/hanson/
: Seems to me the facts are simple.
: Our planet uniquely supports life for the time being.
: Pollution, deforestation, over population, desertification, and other
: consequences
: of profligate development can quickly render the planet lifeless.
Ridiculous: there has been 'life' on this planet for nearly 4 billion years.
Life will continue.
The question is how pleasant it will be for us humans.
--
Matthew B. Kennel/mbk@caffeine.engr.utk.edu/I do not speak for ORNL, DOE or UT
Oak Ridge National Laboratory/University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN USA/
I would not, could not SAVE ON PHONE, |==================================
I would not, could not BUY YOUR LOAN, |The US Government does not like
I would not, could not MAKE MONEY FAST, |spam either. It is ILLEGAL!
I would not, could not SEND NO CA$H, |USC Title 47, section 227
I would not, could not SEE YOUR SITE, |p (b)(1)(C) www.law.cornell.edu/
I would not, could not EAT VEG-I-MITE, | /uscode/47/227.html
I do *not* *like* GREEN CARDS AND SPAM! |==================================
M A D - I - A M!
References: