[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: The Limits To Growth
charliew@hal-pc.org (charliew) wrote:
>In article <578hir$tnj@News2.Lakes.com>,
> gdy52150@prairie.lakes.com (gdy52150@prairie.lakes.com)
>wrote:
>(BIG CUT)
>>i have to agree with Ken's overall assement of cancer
>risk. But for
>>the look at the first enviromental problem of the 21st
>century start
>>looking at endocrine blockers. The chemicals that pose as
>endocrines
>>will be a greater problem than ozone depletion and cancer
>risk
>>combined. There is a fair amount of info available on the
>wweb, just
>>set your search engine to endocrines.
>Oh, boy! Here we go with the next catastrophe in the
>making! I suppose that fertility rates are falling as a
>result of these endocrine blockers. Funny that this would
>be a problem in an otherwise over-populated world.
ok charlie you have prove your an idiot by associating the only effect
of endocrine blockers with reduced fertility.
>Some of you pessimists remind me of a bunch of sheep,
>searching for the next story to blindly follow. Enjoy your
>pessimism.
References: