[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Brashears on Hanson



On Thu, 21 Nov 1996 14:23:42 GMT, brshears@whale.st.usm.edu (Harold
Brashears) wrote:

>I am finally going to donate my two cents to this argument, just for a
>moment.  I must say I think that Jay's definition is fine for a
>nontechnical discussion, as long as you recognize the assumptions he
>has placed in it. 
 
Harold,
 
The problem with this is that Jay's entire career as a freelance
writer is predicated precisely on obscuring his assumptions, on
presenting his weirdie notions as scientific fact, which they aren't.
If he ever made his assumptions clear, he'd have to find a job.
 
                                                              -dlj.



Follow-Ups: References: