[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: fHuman vs. natural influences on the environment



In article <4v0hqu$6ro_003@pm5-51.hal-pc.org>
           charliew@hal-pc.org "charliew" writes:

> In article <840044407snz@nine7.demon.co.uk>,
>    john <john@nine7.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> >Like farmers have had to adapt to new pests in the past we 
> will have to adapt 
> >to these atractive parasites called machines.
> >As they are made of every size particle we ever discover 
> they chalange our 
> >inner and outer space management as never before.
> >It is probable we will damage our genes one way or another 
> so the great gene 
> >pool that this planet is will eventually get its protectors, 
> but how rough will 
> >they be? -- 
> >
> >Yours sincerely....John G.*?*?*?*?*? Us Neuron's don't KNOW 
> that much, period.
> >*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?
> >(Everybody wants to be certifiably nice on this tide of 
> awesome tech' power.)c?
> >(Posts mispelt or not should be written with content to be 
> worth saving
> >so as apathy doesn't drown lurkers)c?
> 
> Whew!  I don't know what you were smoking in your college 
> days, but I bet it was good!
> 
> Regarding automation, men have been trying to slow down 
> technological advancement of machines since the beginning of 
> the industrial revolution.  There are so many inventors, 
> particularly in the more industrial countries, that this is 
> an impossible task.  You either learn to adapt to new 
> technology, or you get left way behind.  It's literally that 
> simple.
> 
Yes it is in the shortish term.
But developing a long term strategy, such as realising that the morality of the 
rich increasingly matters and so looking for the right characters to work for 
is increasingly nessasary.
This is because a person able to buy a million loafs today won,t have as much 
power from technology to hurt life as a person in the future.
The german people probably realise this more than they did, as indeed we all 
do, and its on going.
Another long term strategy is to maintain old crafts and skills of survival in 
your own family & extended family as the risk of seperating major parts of the 
population from technology grows.
If not due to war then due to intended planet protection.
Also as so many more people now exist than ever before, new ways to to survive 
hand to mouth should be researched stategicaly.

In one post someone said we should deal with the problem namely man and 
population of, but I think its more chicken and egg like as if you become 
hostile to your own speceis then it leaves the rest of life to become a lesser 
concern in the struggle to have the joy of life.
Whiest its very important to cut the population to say 10 percent, it is best 
done by emphasise of the benifits and the benifits of helping orphans in the 
third world by bringing them up as your monument to yourself and the wealth of 
needed qualitys in yourself, but I don't know for sure.
-- 

Yours sincerely....John G.*?*?*?*?*? Us Neuron's don't KNOW that much, period.
*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?*?
(Everybody wants to be certifiably nice on this tide of awesome tech' power.)c?
(Posts mispelt or not should be written with content to be worth saving
so as apathy doesn't drown lurkers)c?