[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: fHuman vs. natural influences on the environment



charliew wrote:
> 
> In article <4vmt3k$ru7@igc.apc.org>, tomgray
> <tomgray@igc.apc.org> wrote:
> >charliew@hal-pc.org (charliew) wrote:
> >>In article <4uo7pp$8lv@igc.apc.org>, tomgray
> >><tomgray@igc.apc.org> wrote:
> >>>charliew@hal-pc.org (charliew) wrote:
> >>
> >
> >Sorry, I don't follow the logic here.  It's better to cut
> >population than greenhouse gases, but you acknowledge that
> >cutting population is not possible. ______________________________________________________--
Extrapolation on human popultaion is a mistake . The population
will decline with or w/o our effort , in the future by WAR,disease
sterilization or contraception or... 

Im not saying that it will happen tommorow , but it will happen.
Personally , i think either war,or disease .

These arguments are humorous ! Forcing functions ha ha ha .
did humans cause the ice age ? Nature can change quickly and
drastically without any human cause .
______End of text  from altavoz@azstarnet.com___________



References: