[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
re: Glickman and Biotech
In Article <VA.0000004c.00c74eeb@wrcs.u-net.com>, William R Hite
<wrhite@cix.compulink.co.uk> wrote:
>In article <KF16+lQTVmA@ssc.msu.edu> on 10 Nov 1996 14:12:11 -0500
>craig.harris@ssc.msu.edu wrote:
>Have you seen or heard of any experiments that have assessed even the
>short term effects of GE foods on HUMAN BEINGS?
How about experiments 'that have assessed even the short term effects of new
NON-GE foods on HUMAN BEINGS?' New 'conventionally' bred crop cultivars are
not tested either!
>The key point about this is that NO ONE has performed long or even
>short term scientific studies on human beings.
...on ANY new foods, including non-GE cultivars.
>Plenty of studies saying
>the products are the same as the natural ones. But none where groups of
>healthy, not-so-healthy, young, babies, elderly, disabled or very sick
>people have been fed these things and the results evaluated.
>
>Is that safe? prudent? Not at all.
It is not possible to prove a negative, but in the absence of any indication
that GE foods aren't safe, of course it's reasonable to assume that they
are, just as we assume that new conventionally-bred cultivars are safe,
without testing them.
>Is it ethical? Not at all.
Depends on your standards I guess.
>Is it legal? probably.
Most certainly it is legal. That might be the place to start. Change the law.
Tracy
References: