[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: de-demonizing Monsanto
It would be a good experience for everyone, everyone, to visit the
so-called health centers bulging with people who are there in a last
desperate attempt to recover from cancer or something equally devastating.
When every other person in the US has or will get cancer, does anyone dare
to tell these people that there were no poisonings in their diet history?
When you drive by a field where you see a worker spraying, and he is
covered, literally, from head to toe in protective clothing and face
mask, is it unfair to say that he was protecting himself, thus clothed,
>from poison? Would he go to that trouble and clothing discomfort, if what
he sprayed was not toxic?
If the ordinary foods on the market were not bad for people who end up
with cancer or equally devastating disease, why do they finally force
themselves to go where they will have to undergo exceedingly stringent
organically raised food diet?
Would they just go where they did not have to pay such horrifying fees,
because they would be eating the same kind of """"poisoned"""""" food they
had been eating for 40-50 years already?
Would they get well faster if the new diet items turned out to be not
really new but the same old """poiosned''' foods that got them into that
sick state to begin with?
Would anyone actually eat the food if he could see on the prepared meal
items the long list of chemical names that had been sprayed on these
items, and soaked into the soil in which they grew?
B. Rateaver
References: