[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Bill Tucker's anti-SANET posting



I would like to say something but I can't top Spurgeon Smith, SO DITTO.

J.C. Dowler
Bucyrus, KS
----------
> From: spurgeon smith <spurg@worldnet.att.net>
> To: Nathaniel S. Bacon <nbacon@zoo.uvm.edu>
> Cc: sanet-mg@amani.ces.ncsu.edu
> Subject: Re: Bill Tucker's anti-SANET posting
> Date: Wednesday, December 04, 1996 7:50 PM
> 
> 
> Thanks for your defence of the graze-l folks.  As a low input management 
> intensive grazier in central Texas, I have found many of the postings in 
> this list childish & naive, if not downright kooky.  I think Bill
Tucker's 
> post was timely and appropriate, and his action in unsubscribing is one I

> shall shortly follow.  
> 
> Too bad about the way this list seems to attract prolix faddists  --
there 
> is lots of good stuff here, but I don't have the time to sort out the
raving
> luddites.
> 
> Thanks again --
> 
>  Spurgeon Smith
>  Elgin Texas
> 
> 
> >
>