From nick@vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu Wed Mar 13 12:56:34 EST 1996
Article: 632 of alt.solar.thermal
Path: newz.oit.unc.edu!bigblue.oit.unc.edu!concert!gatech!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!news-1.csn.net!ub!dsinc!news.ee.vill.edu!not-for-mail
From: nick@vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu (Nick Pine)
Newsgroups: sci.energy,sci.engr.heat-vent-ac,alt.solar.thermal,alt.architecture.alternative,alt.home.repair,bit.listserv.geodesic
Subject: Re: A zero-fossil-fuel studio?
Date: 12 Mar 1996 07:26:35 -0500
Organization: Villanova University
Lines: 83
Message-ID: <4i3qhr$lf@vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu>
References: <4gv6k9$gt3@vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu> <4hoe41$om5@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4hvgot$148@nntp.interaccess.com> <4i2i02$2ro@spot.yknet.yk.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu
Xref: newz.oit.unc.edu sci.energy:47149 sci.engr.heat-vent-ac:5574 alt.solar.thermal:632 alt.architecture.alternative:6391 alt.home.repair:20091 bit.listserv.geodesic:4317

Mike Youso  <arctech@yknet.yk.ca> wrote:

>A major concern with any thermal storage system is the moisture from 
>condensation on the surface of the thermal storage modules if a remote 
>storage bank is used.

I agree this is a good thing to avoid. I don't see a problem with moisture
condensing on these containers of water while the containers are heating
the house on a cloudy day, do you? Would moisture condense on the containers
of water as they are being heated by sun-warmed air? Perhaps, if the air is
moist. But the air should be fairly dry in the winter, if the house is
reasonably-well ventilated and the sun heats it up. Do you think condensation
will occur in this system, or are you just saying it's a concern? If so,
I wonder under what conditions might it occur, and how might we avoid it?

>If the storage bank gets much above 60% rh some rather nasty organisms
>will be growing in the air supply system with possibly serious considerations
>for IAQ. 

I wonder how the humidity would increase to 60%? It seems that, say, 32 F air
at 100% relative humidity will have a much lower RH at 68 F, and on an average
day in December, this solar closet should be about 130 F inside.

>The most succesful thermal storage uses direct-gain solar mass walls
>rather than ducting warm moist air to a storage bank.

Again, where does the moist air come from? During charging, the air in a
solar closet is completely self-contained. There is no mixing with house air...

And when you mention "successful" direct gain solar mass walls do you mean
Trombe walls? 

A few years ago, I spent some time explaining to a local architect, a more
technical person than most, who had taken a few engineering courses on the
way to architecting, that a "Trombe wall" with some dark-colored insulation
on the outside and an air gap between the insulation and glazing and some
to the inside of the house that opened up during the day was a lot more
efficient at collecting and keeping solar heat in the house than a plain old
"traditional" Trombe wall, with masonry right behind the glass, with no
insulation. Here's what I said:

  A modified "Trombe wall" with insulation on the outside, and 1 ft^2 of south-
  facing single-glazed area and an R-value of 20, will receive about 1000
  Btu/day of heat on an average 32F December day, where I live. If the room
  behind it has a constant temp of 70F, and the sun shines 6 hours a day,
  on the average, the energy that leaks out of the glass will be about 6 hours
  x (70F-32F) x 1 ft^2/R1 = 228 Btu during the day, and 18 hours x (70-32) x
  1 ft^2/R20 = 34 Btu at night, a net gain of 1000 -228 -34 = 738 Btu/day.
  Simple, no? (~750 Btu, net, with double glazing, which passes less sun.)

  A standard unvented Trombe wall (Table IV-14b of Mazria's book says vented
  ones don't work much better) with a very large uninsulated thermal mass
  right behind the glass and an R-value of, say 2 (roughly 1' of masonry),
  would have an average temperature at the outside wall surface of about
  32F + R1 x (70F-32F)/(R2+R1) = 45F, if there were no sun. If you add a
  heatflow of 1000 Btu/day of sun to that model, falling on the outside
  of the wall, the outside wall surface will have an average temperature
  of about 45F + 1000/24 x (R=2/3) = 72.4F, which contributes 24 hours x
  (72.4F- 70F) x 1 ft^2/R2 = 29 Btu/day to the room behind the wall.

  So the "improved Trombe wall" above, (actually an air heater with the
  thermal storage inside the house) is _more than 25 times as efficient_
  (738/29) at collecting and keeping heat in the room behind it, than
  the usual Trombe wall. This is a bit oversimplified...

Trombe walls are also thermal disasters during long strings of cloudy days.
When the sun goes in for a week or two, they lose their stored heat in less
than a day, and then leak house heat badly, dramatically raising backup
heat or other solar thermal storage requirements.

>Two or three layers of drywall is a good compromise since only the first
>1.5" to 2" is diurnally active.

Seems to me that a few "accent drums" full of water sprinkled around
the house might be cheaper...
 
>a zero fossil fuel studio is quite feasible almost anywhere south of the 
>arctic circle.

We seem to agree on that :-)

Nick



From nick@vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu Fri Mar 15 11:15:08 EST 1996
Article: 637 of alt.solar.thermal
Path: newz.oit.unc.edu!concert!rutgers!oitnews.harvard.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!newsfeed.pitt.edu!scramble.lm.com!hookup!news.mathworks.com!zombie.ncsc.mil!admaix.sunydutchess.edu!ub!dsinc!news.ee.vill.edu!not-for-mail
From: nick@vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu (Nick Pine)
Newsgroups: sci.energy,sci.engr.heat-vent-ac,alt.solar.thermal,alt.architecture.alternative,alt.home.repair,bit.listserv.geodesic
Subject: Re: A zero-fossil-fuel studio?
Date: 13 Mar 1996 18:00:55 -0500
Organization: Villanova University
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <4i7k37$q8q@vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu>
References: <4gv6k9$gt3@vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu> <4i2i02$2ro@spot.yknet.yk.ca> <4i3qhr$lf@vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu> <fNH$RCA4dZRxEwHh@wirrleac.demon.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu
Xref: newz.oit.unc.edu sci.energy:47233 sci.engr.heat-vent-ac:5605 alt.solar.thermal:637 alt.architecture.alternative:6394 alt.home.repair:20112 bit.listserv.geodesic:4343

eteam  <eteam@wirrleac.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>>... a "Trombe wall" with some dark-colored insulation
>>on the outside and an air gap between the insulation and glazing and some
>>holes to the inside of the house that opened up during the day was a lot more
>>efficient at collecting and keeping solar heat in the house than a plain old
>>"traditional" Trombe wall, with masonry right behind the glass, with no
>>insulation...
 
>This modified Trombe wall sounds interesting however could you clarify the
>constuction as we are still  a bit confused. i.e. is the dark insulation
>exterior or merley outside a wall sandwiched between glass.

The insulation is north of an air gap under the glass.
I guess this was not very clear.

>Put another way,
>does it go : outside / glass / dark insulation / wall / interior ?
                              ^
                              |
              Almost...        air gap
                              
>If so , how does the heat transfer through the dark insulation ?

The sun warms the air in the low-thermal-mass air gap, and the warm air moves
up and through a hole in the top of the insulation and wall into the house,
then back out of the house into the air gap through a hole in the bottom of
the wall and insulation during the day, circulating between the house and the
air gap. At night, a one-way plastic film damper covering the top hole or the
bottom hole or both, closes to prevent reverse air flow and cooling, and the
air gap quickly gets cold and stays cold all night, losing no heat to the
outside world, except what flows through the rest of the insulated wall. The
two holes might be equal sized, each 5% of the wall area, if this operates by
natural convection, or they might have less area if what moves the air is a
fan in series with a cooling thermostat in the air gap and a heating thermostat in the house. 

Nick

PS: The airflow by natural convection is on the order of 

    Q = 16.6  x Av   x  square root ((Tairgap - Thouse) x h)

    cfm    ft^2 of each hole          degrees F      wall height in feet.



From nick@vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu Mon Mar 25 22:41:22 EST 1996
Article: 637 of alt.solar.thermal
Path: newz.oit.unc.edu!concert!rutgers!oitnews.harvard.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!newsfeed.pitt.edu!scramble.lm.com!hookup!news.mathworks.com!zombie.ncsc.mil!admaix.sunydutchess.edu!ub!dsinc!news.ee.vill.edu!not-for-mail
From: nick@vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu (Nick Pine)
Newsgroups: sci.energy,sci.engr.heat-vent-ac,alt.solar.thermal,alt.architecture.alternative,alt.home.repair,bit.listserv.geodesic
Subject: Re: A zero-fossil-fuel studio?
Date: 13 Mar 1996 18:00:55 -0500
Organization: Villanova University
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <4i7k37$q8q@vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu>
References: <4gv6k9$gt3@vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu> <4i2i02$2ro@spot.yknet.yk.ca> <4i3qhr$lf@vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu> <fNH$RCA4dZRxEwHh@wirrleac.demon.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu
Xref: newz.oit.unc.edu sci.energy:47233 sci.engr.heat-vent-ac:5605 alt.solar.thermal:637 alt.architecture.alternative:6394 alt.home.repair:20112 bit.listserv.geodesic:4343

eteam  <eteam@wirrleac.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>>... a "Trombe wall" with some dark-colored insulation
>>on the outside and an air gap between the insulation and glazing and some
>>holes to the inside of the house that opened up during the day was a lot more
>>efficient at collecting and keeping solar heat in the house than a plain old
>>"traditional" Trombe wall, with masonry right behind the glass, with no
>>insulation...
 
>This modified Trombe wall sounds interesting however could you clarify the
>constuction as we are still  a bit confused. i.e. is the dark insulation
>exterior or merley outside a wall sandwiched between glass.

The insulation is north of an air gap under the glass.
I guess this was not very clear.

>Put another way,
>does it go : outside / glass / dark insulation / wall / interior ?
                              ^
                              |
              Almost...        air gap
                              
>If so , how does the heat transfer through the dark insulation ?

The sun warms the air in the low-thermal-mass air gap, and the warm air moves
up and through a hole in the top of the insulation and wall into the house,
then back out of the house into the air gap through a hole in the bottom of
the wall and insulation during the day, circulating between the house and the
air gap. At night, a one-way plastic film damper covering the top hole or the
bottom hole or both, closes to prevent reverse air flow and cooling, and the
air gap quickly gets cold and stays cold all night, losing no heat to the
outside world, except what flows through the rest of the insulated wall. The
two holes might be equal sized, each 5% of the wall area, if this operates by
natural convection, or they might have less area if what moves the air is a
fan in series with a cooling thermostat in the air gap and a heating thermostat in the house. 

Nick

PS: The airflow by natural convection is on the order of 

    Q = 16.6  x Av   x  square root ((Tairgap - Thouse) x h)

    cfm    ft^2 of each hole          degrees F      wall height in feet.



From gcp@taynet.co.uk Mon Mar 25 22:47:07 EST 1996
Article: 640 of alt.solar.thermal
Path: newz.oit.unc.edu!concert!rutgers!news.iag.net!news.math.psu.edu!news.cac.psu.edu!psuvm!news.cuny.edu!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc.gsl.net!news-paris.gsl.net!news.taynet.co.uk!usenet
From: gcp@taynet.co.uk (gcp)
Newsgroups: sci.energy,sci.engr.heat-vent-ac,alt.solar.thermal,alt.architecture.alternative,alt.home.repair,bit.listserv.geodesic
Subject: Re: A zero-fossil-fuel studio?
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 20:21:26 GMT
Organization: Taynet
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <4icjc7$d0i@homer.taynet.co.uk>
References: <4gv6k9$gt3@vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu> <4hoe41$om5@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4hvgot$148@nntp.interaccess.com> <4i2i02$2ro@spot.y
NNTP-Posting-Host: modem86.taynet.co.uk
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
Xref: newz.oit.unc.edu sci.energy:47432 sci.engr.heat-vent-ac:5671 alt.solar.thermal:640 alt.architecture.alternative:6436 alt.home.repair:20459 bit.listserv.geodesic:4415

nick@vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu (Nick Pine) wrote:

>And when you mention "successful" direct gain solar mass walls do you mean
>Trombe walls?

>A few years ago, I spent some time explaining to a local architect, a more
>technical person than most, who had taken a few engineering courses on the
>way to architecting, that a "Trombe wall" with some dark-colored insulation
>on the outside and an air gap between the insulation and glazing and some
>to the inside of the house that opened up during the day was a lot more
>efficient at collecting and keeping solar heat in the house than a plain old
>"traditional" Trombe wall, with masonry right behind the glass, with no
>insulation.

An alternative method is to use transparent insulation material (TIM).
This is a honeycomb structure of transparent polycarbonate, somewhat
like drinking straws at right angles to the wall stuck together  to
form a slab, but stoppered to prevent air convection (sounds like
polar bear fur!).
There is no air flow - heat flow to interior is by conduction - and
temperature control is by external blinds (to stop overheating on
summer days and reduce losses at night).

Construction goes:

low-iron content glass/cavity with motorised blind/TIM/backing sheet
of transparent polycarbonate/cavity (to minimise conduction, closed
horizontally at intervals to minimise air circulation/dense wall with
heat absorbing surface.

This is a bit complex;  however direct solar radiation is not
necessary. It is indicated a well insulated house could have its
entire space heating demand met by a 50m2 TIM wall.

There were several papers presented on this at the
2nd European Conference on Architecture, 4-8 Dec '89, Paris.




