[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
re: Organic bio-solids(we have!!!)
- To: Dick Richardson <d.richardson@mail.utexas.edu>
- Subject: re: Organic bio-solids(we have!!!)
- From: "John A. Keslick, Jr." <treeman@pond.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 1997 18:44:12 -0400
- Cc: appointed@chebucto.ns.ca, ag-impact@mtn.org, ecol-agric@mailbase.ac.uk, sanet-mg@ces.ncsu.edu, enviro-news@nal.usda.gov, ENVIRONMENT-L@cornell.edu, waste-l@scu.edu.au, awma@carbon.cudenver.edu, wastenet@msu.edu
- In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.19970724173524.007af670@mail.utexas.edu>
- References: <3.0.1.32.19970724181230.00827920@mail.pond.com>
At 05:35 PM 7/24/97 -0700, Dick Richardson wrote:
>At 06:12 PM 7/24/97 -0400, John A. Keslick, Jr. wrote:
>>If you are pushing pushing bio-solids for food crops please present a list
>>of possible chemicals in teh sludge and a list of the chemicals that are
>>tested for.
>
>It would be illuminating to have the same requirement for ALL fertilizers
>and soil amendments, including those applied with approval for organic
>production. The distinctions begin to grey when the information is available.
>
>Knowledge is power; a little knowledge can be dangerous... or at least
>misleading.
>
>
>R. H. (Dick) Richardson (512) 471-4128 office
>Zoology Dept. 471-9651 FAX
>University of Texas
>Austin, TX 78712
>
>
I do agree 101%
John A. Keslick Jr.---Tree Anatomist & Tree Biologist.-
End Commercial Logging on Federal Lands
Organic Tree Treatment Web Site:
http://www.pond.com/~treeman
References: