[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What is permaculture?
- To: permaculture <permaculture@franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: What is permaculture?
- From: Toby Hemenway <hemenway@jeffnet.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 09:38:01 -0800
- In-reply-to: <LISTMANAGER-86724-36729-2001.12.26-17.35.15--hemenway#jeffnet.org@franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Newsgroups: permaculture
- User-agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022
on 12/26/01 2:34 PM, S.K. Harrison at skh23ca@yahoo.com wrote:
> I may have confused my aims for you, Toby, by
> including Jeff's quote in my previous post, but
> it should be taken as an aside, not an example of
> my intentions.
Actually the subject line, "What is permaculture?" was intended
tongue-in-check, a reference that John caught with his response "Oh, no,
not "that" question again!" I probably should have included the appropriate
facial symbol. The question I asked in the text was more specific: how do we
classify permaculture, and what makes classification so hard?
> Would you explain [why] "coming to terms with it" [is hard for you]?
("it" being Sean's observation that permaculture doesn't fit into knowledge
structures)
Jeff caught a sense of that when he pointed out that how a question is
framed defines how we think about the question. If we can't describe how
permaculture fits in with existing knowledge, I think it will remain on the
fringe, and continue to be ignored or misunderstood (or hated, in some
cases) by most people.
> if an ass looks in, a
> saint won't look out. And I believe at that point
> we begin to address your concern, Toby, for
> promoting pc even to people with barely one whit
> of ecological sensibility.
I've seen people with a great deal of ecological
understanding reject permaculture because it doesn't easily fit into their
knowledge framework, or even because they feel it threatens their
specialties by being so all-inclusive (as in "how dare you suggest that
agroforestry [e.g.] is just a part of permaculture!") So I think that if we
could show Pc's relation to other fields of knowledge, it would be embraced
by a wider circle of people.