Meadville Space Center
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
February 25, 2020, 09:56:02 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Project Apollo Beta 7.0 released!
http://nassp.sf.net/wiki/Installation
25068 Posts in 2094 Topics by 2266 Members
Latest Member: twa517
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  Meadville Space Center
|-+  Project Apollo - NASSP
| |-+  Project Apollo - NASSP Development
| | |-+  Modeling (Moderators: movieman, Swatch, lassombra)
| | | |-+  Apollo to Venus
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Apollo to Venus  (Read 5724 times)
movieman
Moderator
Hero Member
****
Posts: 1710



View Profile
« on: June 28, 2006, 10:07:37 AM »

Any chance of building a 'docking tunnel' payload for the SIVb? That would allow us to simulate the first steps towards the 'Apollo to Venus' plan shown on page 110 of:

http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19790072165_1979072165.pdf

The plan seemed to be first fly a standard SIVb with the docking tunnel allowing them to access the fuel tanks after launch to prove it could be done, then fly the modified SIVb with the storage module above the fuel tanks (basically a 'wet' skylab) for orbital testing, then fly the modifed SIVb and the modified CSM (with two LEM engines rather than the SPS) to Venus.

The complete trip to Venus will require lots of extra work so it's something for the future, but the inital test flight would just need a new docking tunnel mesh and a few lines of code to implement it as a payload (see the bottom-but-one drawing on that page).
« Last Edit: June 28, 2006, 10:13:38 AM by movieman » Logged
Coussini
Project Team Member
Hero Member
****
Posts: 699


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2006, 10:18:02 AM »

Interresting. Great document.
Logged

Have a nice day
movieman
Moderator
Hero Member
****
Posts: 1710



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2006, 10:27:28 AM »

Actually, it would also need some more changes to the TLI program, as it appears the plan was to do the transposition and docking _before_ the burn that would take you out of Earth orbit: but that's not too hard to fix up either. We'd need to stick an IU into the SIVb DLL and provide a way for the CSM to talk to it.

Apparently you'd have very little time to do an abort with the CSM if there's a problem during the TVI burn to Venus, so they wanted the CSM activated and checked out before doing the burn... which required seperating it from the SIVb first. I'd guess that the 'eyeballs out' burn with the SIVb is something they'd want to try on the first Earth orbital test flight.

The docking tunnel also appears to have an EVA airlock, though it's not clear where from the diagram: unless they planned to seperate the CSM from the SIVb and use the docking tunnel itself as the airlock.
« Last Edit: June 28, 2006, 10:31:57 AM by movieman » Logged
movieman
Moderator
Hero Member
****
Posts: 1710



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: July 05, 2006, 09:16:45 PM »

For now I've simulated the docking tunnel with the ASTP mesh, but more changes are required to allow the docked CSM to control the SIVb.
Logged
Zachstar
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 317

Is it Star Trek?


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: September 02, 2006, 11:18:57 PM »

Anymore updates or screenshots of this part of the project?  Confused

It kind of heat up for a bit then died down. Thats too bad  Sigh
Logged


-------------------------------------------
movieman
Moderator
Hero Member
****
Posts: 1710



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: September 03, 2006, 07:02:26 AM »

Well, I think phase A is done: it needs new meshes (and Block III/IV CSM) for B and C.

http://www.orbiterwiki.org/wiki/Image:VenusFlybyPhases.jpg

I haven't wanted to make any non-essential changes to the CSM lately as it's close to being releasable.
« Last Edit: September 03, 2006, 09:30:46 AM by movieman » Logged
Graham2001
Guest
« Reply #6 on: January 20, 2007, 09:51:57 AM »

I'd also be interested to hear what the current progress status is, also have you seen this 1967 study which discusses a Manned Venus Orbiter which would either have used Apollo or NERVA technology.
Logged
movieman
Moderator
Hero Member
****
Posts: 1710



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: January 20, 2007, 01:39:31 PM »

Well, the next phase needs new meshes and a new CSM Happy.

However, most of the work on the SIVB would be compatible with Skylab; we'd need an option to create a Skylab mesh with or without a J-2 engine, and to have different docking meshes on the front. If someone wants to build those meshes, then the code for that part shouldn't be hard.

Plus as discussed on the Orbiter Forum, that would also mean we could do the Lunar Skylab.
Logged
Graham2001
Guest
« Reply #8 on: November 10, 2008, 11:24:41 AM »

Still wondering about the progress on this mission. Thought you might be intersted in this trajectory study:

A survey of 30-day staytime orbital missions to Venus (1972 - 2000)(451kb)

May not be much use for the flyby missions, but might be useful for the Manned Venus Orbital missions.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!