| Re: Gridcosm readings | ||
by Ed Stastny ![]() |
2000-06-30 17:55:55 | [301] |
|
You're right... it should actually be **0, **4 and **9. Right? Gridcosm starts at 000. ...e | ||
|
In reply to: Re: Gridcosm readings |
Replies: Re: Gridcosm readings | |
View actual post on SITO web site
Index of all topics