[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(fwd) Cerulean conservation
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: (fwd) Cerulean conservation
- From: "Will Cook" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 17:54:48 -0500
- Sender: email@example.com
Forwarded from Derb Carter of the Southern Environmental Law Center
------- Forwarded message follows -------
A coalition of 28 national, regional and local conservation organizations
notified the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) today that the agency
has violated the Endangered Species Act by failing to respond
appropriately to the coalition's petition to list the Cerulean Warbler as
a threatened species. The groups, including the National Audubon
Society, say the agency has failed to initiate the steps required under
the law to respond to the petition filed in October 2000. The Act
requires that before filing a lawsuit, citizens must give the agency 60
days notice, which the coalition did in a letter sent today.
The Cerulean Warbler is one of the fastest disappearing songbirds in the
country. The bird, known for its brilliant blue plumage and distinctive
song, has declined an average of 4% a year throughout its eastern U.S.
range, for a total loss of 70% over the last three decades. Experts
attribute this dramatic decline to the destruction and fragmentation of
large native forests in the U.S., which the Cerulean needs to reproduce
in the summer, and deforestation in the Andean mountains of South
America, where it spends the winter. In the U.S., the Cerulean's decline
has been the worst in the core of its range in the Southeast and Midwest,
where its population has plummeted by about 80%.
"If the Fish and Wildlife Service would do what it is supposed to do
under the law, we would be moving forward toward listing this songbird
and protecting the forests it needs to survive," said Doug Ruley, an
attorney with the Southern Environmental Law Center, which represents the
"We are in real danger of losing this spectacular songbird forever," said
Lois Schiffer, a senior vice-president of Audubon. "The Fish & Wildlife
Service needs to act immediately so our children can hear its special
song and see the bright blue color of this unique bird."
Under the Endangered Species Act, the FWS is required to (1) determine
within 90 days whether the citizens' petition presented substantial
information indicating that the listing may be warranted, (2) if so,
conduct a status review of the species, and (3) make a final
determination concerning the listing within 12 months of the petition.
The FWS has taken none of these steps since the conservation groups filed
their petition to list the Cerulean.
Ruley said the coalition did not take legal action sooner because the FWS
undertook an informal consideration of the Cerulean's status that could
have led to a listing decision. However, in a letter dated December 21,
2001, the FWS told the coalition that it would not proceed with a formal
review process at this time.
"For too long, FWS has shirked its duty to protect America's endangered
wildlife. Our aim is to propel this bureaucratic juggernaut toward
positive action," said Marty Bergoffen, an attorney with the Southern
Appalachian Biodiversity Project, one of the petitioners.
The FWS letter questioned the use of Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) data to
determine the extent of the Cerulean's decline, even though the BBS has
been widely recognized for many years as the primary source for
determining avian population trends. In the Cerulean's case, the BBS
data is confirmed by multiple independent sources that indicate a drastic
decline in populations, especially in the core of the bird's range. The
FWS also claimed that it lacked information about threats to the bird,
even though the FWS is directly involved in studies of destructive
activities, such as mountaintop removal mining, in several of the
remaining forests that retain concentrations of this songbird.
"They're playing Catch 22 with the Cerulean," said Ruley. "We know this
songbird has declined precipitously, that we've lost much of its forest
habitat here and in South America, and that the remaining forests face
significant threats. To the extent more information would be helpful, a
listing is the best way to insure that the needed research occurs."
The FWS letter indicated the agency will seek funding in FY2002 to
prepare a 90-day finding and, based on the outcome, the full status
review as required under the Act. However, "moving forward as required
under the law should be a certainty, not a maybe," said Ruley.
"Protection under the Endangered Species Act is the Cerulean's best
chance to survive," added Schiffer.
If the FWS does not meet the terms of the Act as outlined in the notice
filed by the groups today, the coalition may go to court after 60 days to
enforce the law. Joining the National Audubon Society in seeking
protection for the Cerulean Warbler are the Sierra Club, the Wilderness
Society, Defenders of Wildlife, and 24 local, state and regional
conservation groups from 15 states.
------- End of forwarded message -------
Charles W. "Will" Cook w 919-660-7423
Biology Dept., Duke Univ., Box 90340, Durham, NC 27708