Not being a patent lawyer, there must be some subtle issue I am not considering, but it seems to me the following patent (at least the first claim) should never have been issued as being utterly obvious and trivial. 5,356,293 1792 OG 10/18/94 434/236 Sexually transmitted disease awareness program package Joseph Mizglewski, New Jersey 1. A sexually-transmitted disease awareness program package, said package comprising: a series of collector trading cards, said series including a first plurality of cards, each of said first plurality of cards having a celebrity pictured on a first side, and said celebrity's own, personal views on "safe sex" expressed on an opposite, second side, and a second plurality of cards having educational facts about sex provided thereon; and a sealed condom; wherein said first plurality of cards, said second plurality of cards, and said sealed condom are contained within a protective wrapping. Greg Aharonian Internet Patent News Service (for subscription info, send 'help' to patents@world.std.com ) (for prior art search services info, send 'prior' to patents@world.std.com ) (for WWW patent searching, try http://sunsite.unc.edu/patents/intropat.html )