[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fw: Sun v. Microsquish
This is a question I had for James Evans that he replied to. Some of you
may find it interesting (or you may not).
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: James Evans <jimevans@ix.netcom.com>
To: Chris Beck <cmbeck@cris.com>
Date: Saturday, October 11, 1997 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: Sun v. Microsquish
>Chris,
>The folks at Sun never mentioned anyone else complaining about Microsoft's
>implimentation of Java
>in MSIE 4.0, and I don't know anything about Visual J++ version 1.1, or
>what propriety hold Microsoft may have over programs created from it.
>Jim Evans
>
>At 07:57 PM 10/10/97 -0400, you wrote:
>> Mr. Evans,
>>
>>I'm in Paul Jones' cybercasting class and your article on the Sun v.
>>Microsoft suit was on our listserv. I have a question for you.
>>
>>Has anyone other than Sun complained of Microsoft's implimentation of Java
>>in MSIE 4.0, and does Visual J++ version 1.1 create a Microsoft propriety
>>version of Java?
>>
>>I'm a budding Java programmer using Visual J++, but I'm attracted to the
>>language for its cross-compatibility. It sounds like I need to switch to
>>J-Builder or something.
>>
>>Thanks for your time,
>>
>>Chris
>>
>>*********************************************************************
>> Christopher M. Beck
>>guru@christopherbeck.com
>> go big or go home
>> http://www.christopherbeck.com
>>*********************************************************************
>>
>>
>>
>>
>***********
>James Evans
>San Francisco Daily Journal
>90 N. 1st Street
>Suite 100
>San Jose, CA 95113-1223
>408/287-4866 Voice
>408/287-2544 Fax
>james_evans@dailyjournal.com
>
Follow-Ups: