Subject: Re: Circular references

From: Paul Singleton <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 16:00:00 +0100

"Richard A. O'Keefe" wrote:

> Find another way to represent your information (there is *always*
> a better method than cyclic terms).

I'm intrigued by your assertion: 

 * what do you mean by "better"?

 * can you prove it?

Paul Singleton