Return-Path: owner-LDP-L@cornell.edu
Received: from listproc.mail.cornell.edu (listproc.mail.cornell.edu [132.236.56.14]) by keos.Helsinki.FI (8.6.9/H46) with SMTP id WAA21910 for <LARS.WIRZENIUS@CS.HELSINKI.FI>; Sun, 4 Dec 1994 22:41:36 +0200
Received: from host ([127.0.0.1]) by listproc.mail.cornell.edu with SMTP id <98951-5>; Sun, 4 Dec 1994 15:35:50 -0500
Received: from cornell.edu ([132.236.56.6]) by listproc.mail.cornell.edu with SMTP id <98841-8>; Sun, 4 Dec 1994 15:35:04 -0500
Received: from cornell.edu (PHQUERY) by cornell.edu with cornell-phquery id <372912-3>; Sun, 4 Dec 1994 15:34:56 -0500
Received: from imladris ([193.88.66.93]) by cornell.edu with SMTP id <372908-1>; Sun, 4 Dec 1994 15:34:44 -0500
Message-Id: <m0rEN0l-00008TC@imladris>
Date: 	Sun, 4 Dec 1994 14:54:19 -0500
Reply-To: LDP-L@cornell.edu
Sender: owner-LDP-L@cornell.edu
From: khp@pip.dknet.dk (Kai Harrekilde-Petersen)
To: Linux Documentation Project writers <LDP-L@cornell.edu>
Subject: Re: Some comments
In-Reply-To: <199412020626.RAA13646@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU> from "Terry Dawson" at Dec 2, 94 01:26:11 am
Content-Type: text
X-Cc: terryd@extro.ucc.su.co.oz.au (Terry Dawson)
X-PH: V4.1@cornell.edu (Cornell Modified) 
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 7.1 -- ListProcessor by CREN
Content-Length: 1222
Status: RO
X-Status: 

Terry Dawson writes:
> > [I wrote:]
> > The *real* test of long section headers would be the PPP FAQ.  I helped Al
> > Longyear to convert the old ascii version into SGML, and i could think of no
> 
> Oh, when did this happen ? If this is to be part of the LDP suite then I'll
> remove the outdated slab of PPP info I have in the NET-2-HOWTO.

I did it in the beginning of november (looking through my files, I see that
it's datestamped Nov 3).  The SGML'ed version is really a straight
conversion of Al's PPP-for-Linux FAQ.  His version is dated October 24th.
Talk to Al about the what is outdated and what's not. I'm no PPP expert -- I
just use it 8-)

> > better way of converting the Q&A style, than using a <sect1> for each
> > question. [...]
> > Hmmm ... maybe we could have a special <question> / <answer> thing
> > for FAQ sections?
> 
> I used <descrip> for the Q/A section in the NET-2-HOWTO.

I thought about that one too, but decided for the <sect1> instead. I'll take
at your Q/A section when I find the time for it (probably next weekend)

Kai
-- 
Kai Harrekilde-Petersen  <khp@pip.dknet.dk>  Linux: choice of a GNU generation
>> Inside every little problem there's a BIG problem, struggling to get out <<

