Return-Path: owner-linux-doc@vger.rutgers.edu
Received: from kantti.helsinki.fi (root@kantti.Helsinki.FI [128.214.4.16]) by keos.Helsinki.FI (8.6.10/H46) with ESMTP id LAA00691 for <wirzeniu@cs.Helsinki.FI>; Tue, 30 May 1995 11:09:56 +0300
Received: from vger.rutgers.edu (davem@vger.rutgers.edu [128.6.190.2]) by kantti.helsinki.fi (8.6.12+Emil1.1/8.6.5) with SMTP id LAA26457 for <wirzeniu@cc.helsinki.fi>; Tue, 30 May 1995 11:09:51 +0300
Received: (from davem@localhost) by vger.rutgers.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) id DAA25064 for linux-doc-outgoing; Tue, 30 May 1995 03:13:40 -0400
Date: Tue, 30 May 1995 09:13:00 +0200
From: torsten martinsen <torsten@kom.auc.dk>
Message-Id: <199505300713.JAA22611@zil.kom.auc.dk>
To: linux-doc@vger.rutgers.edu
Subject: Re: Please make the LDP docs free in the GNU sense
In-Reply-To: <3qdteu$k78@freya.yggdrasil.com>
References: <3qdteu$k78@freya.yggdrasil.com>
Sender: owner-linux-doc@vger.rutgers.edu
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 1265
Status: RO
X-Status: 

>>>>> "Adam" == Adam J Richter <adam@adam.yggdrasil.com> writes:

Adam> 	GNU/Linux is about eliminating the need for proprietary
Adam> software to run a really good operating system, which people can hack
Adam> on, improve and redistribute at will.  I think much of our success in
Adam> comparison to mach and *bsd is due to copyleft, which allows businesses
Adam> to distribute and sometimes develop free software without fear of their
Adam> competitors "going proprietary," at least with the copylefted sections.

	[...]

Adam> 	The dirty secret of the LDP is that most of the LDP docs are not
Adam> "free" in the GNU sense.  They almost are, but they prohibit improvement.
Adam> You have to get the authors permission to distribute modified versions,
Adam> which is functionally the same as having no such permission.  

The same problem exists with the current LaTeX2e release.

Adam> 	Now, I know that control by the author is important to some
Adam> of you, but I think that the approach taken by slackware, and many other
Adam> free software projects addresses it quiet well.  Require approval
Adam> of modifications for use of the *name*, but not content.

I think this is a good solution (the same approach was adopted by Donald
Knuth for TeX).

-Torsten

