Return-Path: owner-linux-doc@vger.rutgers.edu
Received: from kantti.helsinki.fi (root@kantti.Helsinki.FI [128.214.4.16]) by keos.cs.Helsinki.FI (8.6.10/H46) with ESMTP id OAA00432 for <wirzeniu@cs.Helsinki.FI>; Sun, 11 Jun 1995 14:21:25 +0300
Received: from vger.rutgers.edu (davem@vger.rutgers.edu [128.6.190.2]) by kantti.helsinki.fi (8.6.12+Emil1.1/8.6.5) with SMTP id OAA14621 for <wirzeniu@cc.helsinki.fi>; Sun, 11 Jun 1995 14:21:22 +0300
Received: (from davem@localhost) by vger.rutgers.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) id GAA19849 for linux-doc-outgoing; Sun, 11 Jun 1995 06:30:39 -0400
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 1995 13:30:26 +0300 (EET DST)
From: Lars Wirzenius <wirzeniu@cc.helsinki.fi>
X-Sender: wirzeniu@kruuna
To: linux-doc@vger.rutgers.edu
cc: adam@adam.yggdrasil.com
Subject: Re: Please make the LDP docs free in the GNU sense
In-Reply-To: <3qdteu$k78@freya.yggdrasil.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950611132724.10582P-100000@kruuna>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux-doc@vger.rutgers.edu
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 519
Status: RO
X-Status: 

On 30 May 1995, Adam J. Richter wrote:
> Require approval of modifications for use of the *name*, but not content.

FWIW, I think I agree with Adam on this.  (Took me a long time to get to 
the top 1/3 of my mailbox; still 2/3 to go...).

I could even live with using the GPL for my document.

Does anyone else agree?  Have we discussed this already?  Is my mind 
going?

-- 
Lars.Wirzenius@helsinki.fi  (finger wirzeniu@klaava.helsinki.fi)
NEW: Publib version 0.5: ftp://ftp.cs.helsinki.fi/pub/Software/Local/Publib/

