Return-Path: martin.konold@student.uni-tuebingen.de
Received: from kantti.helsinki.fi (root@kantti.Helsinki.FI [128.214.4.16]) by keos.cs.Helsinki.FI (8.6.10/H46) with ESMTP id DAA04882 for <wirzeniu@cs.Helsinki.FI>; Mon, 12 Jun 1995 03:42:14 +0300
Received: from mailserv.uni-tuebingen.de (mailserv.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.250.102]) by kantti.helsinki.fi (8.6.12+Emil1.1/8.6.5) with SMTP id DAA06319 for <wirzeniu@cc.helsinki.fi>; Mon, 12 Jun 1995 03:42:11 +0300
Received: from hp23.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de by mailserv.uni-tuebingen.de 
          with SMTP (PP); Mon, 12 Jun 1995 02:41:32 +0000
Received: by hp23.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de (1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA020087688;
          Mon, 12 Jun 1995 02:41:28 +0200
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 1995 02:41:27 +0200 (MESZ)
From: Martin Konold <martin.konold@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
To: Lars Wirzenius <wirzeniu@cc.helsinki.fi>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.rutgers.edu, adam@adam.yggdrasil.com
Subject: Re: Please make the LDP docs free in the GNU sense
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950611132724.10582P-100000@kruuna>
Message-Id: <Pine.HPP.3.91.950612024035.1991C-100000@hp23.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Length: 497
Status: RO
X-Status: 



On Sun, 11 Jun 1995, Lars Wirzenius wrote:

> On 30 May 1995, Adam J. Richter wrote:
> > Require approval of modifications for use of the *name*, but not content.
> 
> FWIW, I think I agree with Adam on this.  (Took me a long time to get to 
> the top 1/3 of my mailbox; still 2/3 to go...).
> 
> I could even live with using the GPL for my document.
> 
> Does anyone else agree?  Have we discussed this already?  Is my mind 
> going?
> 

This is exactly the way to go.
100% agreed.


-- martin
