Return-Path: owner-LDP-L@cornell.edu
Received: from listproc.mail.cornell.edu (LISTPROC.MAIL.CORNELL.EDU [132.236.56.14]) by keos.cs.Helsinki.FI (8.6.10/H46) with ESMTP id DAA02241 for <LARS.WIRZENIUS@CS.HELSINKI.FI>; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 03:08:18 +0300
Received: from localhost.mail.cornell.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by listproc.mail.cornell.edu (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id UAA04025; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 20:05:53 -0400
Received: from cornell.edu (cornell.edu [132.236.56.6]) by listproc.mail.cornell.edu (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id UAA03947 for <LDP-L@listproc.mail.cornell.edu>; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 20:05:31 -0400
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by cornell.edu (8.6.9/8.6.9) id UAA13094 for LDP-L@listproc.mail.cornell.edu; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 20:07:42 -0400
Received: from gauss.rutgers.edu (gauss.rutgers.edu [128.6.62.3]) by cornell.edu (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id UAA13078 for <LDP-L@cornell.edu>; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 20:07:39 -0400
Received: (from greenfie@localhost) by gauss.rutgers.edu (8.6.12+bestmx+oldruq+newsunq+grosshack/8.6.12) id UAA23441; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 20:07:39 -0400
Message-Id: <199507100007.UAA23441@gauss.rutgers.edu>
Date: Sun, 9 Jul 1995 20:07:39 -0400
Reply-To: LDP-L@cornell.edu
Sender: owner-LDP-L@cornell.edu
From: Greenfie <greenfie@gauss.rutgers.edu>
To: Linux Documentation Project writers  <LDP-L@cornell.edu>
Subject: Re: Yggdrasil and LDP
In-Reply-To: <199507092336.TAA00348@thokk.cs.cornell.edu> (mdw@CS.CORNELL.EDU)
X-PH: V4.1@cornell.edu (Cornell Modified) 
X-Listprocessor-Version: 7.2(a) -- ListProcessor by CREN
Content-Length: 1634
Status: RO
X-Status: 

When I read the Yggdrasil announcement, a flag went off in my mind saying
"Flamewar coming".  I'd like to say that I really don't consider this a
scummy tactic in any way.

Matt, if I recall in addition to writing the I&GS "free" manual, you also
have a more traditional published book with a more traditional copyright,
correct?  Did you choose the copyright scheme because of pressure from the
publisher?  After all, I assume (and hope!) that you're getting royalties,
which is exactly what Yggdrasil is offering, in exchange for changing a
copyright to be more in line with their policy as a company.

The GPL by itself is like this---in exchange for getting people to change
their copyrights, it allows people access to freely redistributable
software complete with source code.  It's a trade off.

I don't consider this to be any more pressure than if someone came up to me
while I was walking down the street and offered to pay me $5 to walk on the
other side of the street.  It's a proposition for payment for certain
actions.

I was never overly happy with the copyright scheme.  I probably will change
mine.  Will it be specifically because of this?  Well, no, but this will
make me take some sort of action.  (Not to mention I hope to have a new
version out in August.  I may as well put a new copyright on it by then.)

I plan on duplicating the copyright used on the FSF's manuals, as I don't
consider that to be "more restrictive" than the GPL.  I also haven't seen
them have any problems.

Ahh well.

Whatever.
-- 
Larry Greenfield
greenfie(ld)@gauss.rutgers.edu
        ^^^^ for better mailing, delete these characters
