Return-Path: owner-LDP-L@cornell.edu
Received: from listproc.mail.cornell.edu (LISTPROC.MAIL.CORNELL.EDU [132.236.56.14]) by keos.cs.Helsinki.FI (8.6.10/H46) with ESMTP id IAA03501 for <LARS.WIRZENIUS@CS.HELSINKI.FI>; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 08:30:00 +0300
Received: from localhost.mail.cornell.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by listproc.mail.cornell.edu (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id BAA20764; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 01:27:32 -0400
Received: from cornell.edu (cornell.edu [132.236.56.6]) by listproc.mail.cornell.edu (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id BAA20746 for <LDP-L@listproc.mail.cornell.edu>; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 01:27:22 -0400
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by cornell.edu (8.6.9/8.6.9) id BAA21732 for LDP-L@listproc.mail.cornell.edu; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 01:29:35 -0400
Received: from extra.ucc.su.OZ.AU (root@extra.ucc.su.OZ.AU [129.78.64.4]) by cornell.edu (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id BAA21708 for <ldp-l@cornell.edu>; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 01:29:08 -0400
Received: from extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU (terryd@extro [129.78.128.1]) by extra.ucc.su.OZ.AU (8.6.10/8.6.10) with ESMTP id PAA29204; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 15:27:40 +1000
Received: (terryd@localhost) by extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU (8.6.10/8.6.6) id PAA13406; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 15:27:37 +1000
Message-Id: <199507100527.PAA13406@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 1995 15:27:37 +1000
Reply-To: LDP-L@cornell.edu
Sender: owner-LDP-L@cornell.edu
From: Terry Dawson <terryd@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU>
To: Linux Documentation Project writers  <LDP-L@cornell.edu>
Subject: LDP copyright
X-To: adam@yggdrasil.com, ldp-l@cornell.edu, rms@gnu.ai.mit.edu
X-PH: V4.1@cornell.edu (Cornell Modified) 
X-Listprocessor-Version: 7.2(a) -- ListProcessor by CREN
Content-Length: 537
Status: RO
X-Status: 


I am personally an advocate of the GPL in concept. I personally don't have
any concerns at such a change provided I understand the reasons for the change.

I share Vince's concern that I wasn't approached personally, perhaps the fact
that I wasn't means that the documents I am involved with are covered by a
copyright that suits Adam's purposes ?

As much as a I respect Matt and hiss views, I'm quite keen to hear directly from
Adam and Richard on the matter to satisfy myself that I understand the core
issues here.

regards
Terry


