Return-Path: owner-LDP-L@cornell.edu
Received: from listproc.mail.cornell.edu (LISTPROC.MAIL.CORNELL.EDU [132.236.56.14]) by keos.cs.Helsinki.FI (8.6.10/H46) with ESMTP id SAA23042 for <LARS.WIRZENIUS@CS.HELSINKI.FI>; Sun, 23 Jul 1995 18:57:40 +0300
Received: from localhost.mail.cornell.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by listproc.mail.cornell.edu (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA18009; Sun, 23 Jul 1995 11:53:29 -0400
Received: from cornell.edu (cornell.edu [132.236.56.6]) by listproc.mail.cornell.edu (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA17939 for <LDP-L@listproc.mail.cornell.edu>; Sun, 23 Jul 1995 11:51:50 -0400
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by cornell.edu (8.6.9/8.6.9) id LAA25330 for LDP-L@listproc.mail.cornell.edu; Sun, 23 Jul 1995 11:54:11 -0400
Received: from simon.cs.cornell.edu (SIMON.CS.CORNELL.EDU [128.84.154.10]) by cornell.edu (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA25323 for <LDP-L@cornell.edu>; Sun, 23 Jul 1995 11:54:10 -0400
Received: from cloyd.cs.cornell.edu (CLOYD.CS.CORNELL.EDU [128.84.227.15]) by simon.cs.cornell.edu (8.6.10/R1.01) with ESMTP id LAA05594; Sun, 23 Jul 1995 11:54:07 -0400
Received: from thokk.cs.cornell.edu (THOKK.CS.CORNELL.EDU [128.84.254.9]) by cloyd.cs.cornell.edu (8.6.10/M1.6) with ESMTP id LAA23981; Sun, 23 Jul 1995 11:54:00 -0400
Received: (mdw@localhost) by thokk.cs.cornell.edu (8.6.10/C1.3) id LAA29693; Sun, 23 Jul 1995 11:53:59 -0400
Message-Id: <199507231553.LAA29693@thokk.cs.cornell.edu>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 1995 11:53:59 EDT
Reply-To: LDP-L@cornell.edu
Sender: owner-LDP-L@cornell.edu
From: mdw@CS.CORNELL.EDU (Matt Welsh)
To: Linux Documentation Project writers  <LDP-L@cornell.edu>
Subject: Re: LDP and FSF and copyrights
X-To: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.ai.mit.edu>, mdw@CS.Cornell.EDU
X-Cc: adam@yggdrasil.com, LDP-L@cornell.edu
X-PH: V4.1@cornell.edu (Cornell Modified) 
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.0 10/31/90)
X-Listprocessor-Version: 7.2(a) -- ListProcessor by CREN
Content-Length: 1798
Status: RO
X-Status: 

[Forwarded from RMS. --mdw]

--- Forwarded mail from Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.ai.mit.edu>

>From rms@gnu.ai.mit.edu  Sun Jul 23 02:05:23 1995
Received: from mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu (mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu [128.52.46.33]) by cloyd.cs.cornell.edu (8.6.10/M1.6) with ESMTP id CAA21306 for <mdw@CS.Cornell.EDU>; Sun, 23 Jul 1995 02:05:20 -0400
Received: by mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12GNU) id CAA23897; Sun, 23 Jul 1995 02:05:17 -0400
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 1995 02:05:17 -0400
Message-Id: <199507230605.CAA23897@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.ai.mit.edu>
To: mdw@CS.Cornell.EDU
cc: rms@gnu.ai.mit.edu
Cc: adam@yggdrasil.com, LDP-L@cornell.edu
In-reply-to: <199507222337.TAA29310@thokk.cs.cornell.edu> (mdw@CS.Cornell.EDU)
Subject: Re: LDP and FSF and copyrights
Status: O

[Please forward this to ldp-l]

    It seems that I could come up with a complex license that would allow
    someone to edit the book as long as they didn't touch certain sections

Not much complexity is needed.  The Emacs manual's copying conditions
are just 22 lines, and only 7 of them concern the sections that
mustn't be changed.

    or modify material in certain ways.  But this seems, to me, more 
    restrictive than simply allowing me to act as a filter on a case-by-case
    basis.

It's impossible to be more restrictive than what you are doing now,
because right now we have exactly zero freedom to modify the text.  We
cannot have any less.  (The possibility of asking someone for
permission is not freedom.)

If we could modify all except a few sections (of personal views), that
would give us all the freedom that we need in practice.  We would go
from zero freedom to sufficient freedom.  This is a big step forward.


--- End of forwarded message from Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.ai.mit.edu>

