20070305.ba v04_n025.bam.20070305 >From ???@??? Mon Mar 5 12:23:11 2007 -0600 Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 18:22:11 GMT From: Old Tube Radios To: Old Tube Radios Subject: BOATANCHORS digest 4025 Message-Id: <20070305182213.D51C0187B08@srvr1.theporch.com> BOATANCHORS Digest 4025 Topics covered in this issue include: 1) Re: Evaluate freq counters by "Arden Allen" 2) Re: Evaluate freq counters by AAFRadio 3) Re: Evaluate freq counters by Scott Robinson 4) Did You Get A Crystal Kit for you ART-13? by "David Stinson" 5) Re: [ARC5] Did You Get A Crystal Kit for you ART-13? by jcoward5452@aol.com 6) K6KPH OTA for KSM Reports by Richard Dillman 7) Re: [ARC5] Did You Get A Crystal Kit for you ART-13? by WA5CAB@cs.com 8) Re: Evaluate freq counters by Bob Roehrig 9) RE: Evaluate freq counters by "Rodger" 10) RE: Evaluate freq counters by Bob Roehrig 11) AM boatanchors galore! "Every Single Minute" by "Ed Sieb" 12) Eudora Email users - Important info by John Dilks K2TQN 13) RE: Eudora Email users - Important info by "Meir WF2U" 14) Re: Eudora Email users - Important info by Garey Barrell 15) 1980's Radio Systems Material Posted by Jerry Proc 16) RE: Eudora Email users - Important info by stuck in 50s 17) looking for Allan Culbert by wb3fau@att.net 18) Part 97 of FCC rules by John Sehring ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message-ID: <002d01c75d3d$66696580$80e47443@KB6NAX> From: "Arden Allen" To: Old Tube Radios Subject: Re: Evaluate freq counters Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 18:41:03 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit John, the most common problem with digital frequency counters in my experience is erroneous readings. You've touched on a couple, noise and waveform distortion, and coupling problems. Simple counters with no means of affecting input level, triggering slope, and AC or DC coupling can be very frustraing to use because anything that needs to be done for the counter to "see" the signal's fundamental frequency must be done externally. Sometimes one needs to view a waveform on an oscilloscope to sort out the problem with getting an accurate counter reading. Timebase accuracy is usually of little concern when working on boatanchors. For dead on digital frequency synthesis operations a more accurate timebase is sometimes required. Older high accuracy counters have ovenized timebase crystal oscillators to maintain a tightly controlled ambient temperature for the crystal. Modern higher accuracy timebase oscillators are commonly temperature compensated circuit modules. A counter can be upgraded by replacing an uncompensated timebase oscillator with a compensated module. A counter with no less than seven digits of "resolution" will do most jobs. For example measuring 30.00000 MHz allows you to see any drift or instability in as little as 10Hz increments. One can go on about more or less usefull control functions. The most agile counter I have is a HP 5315A (common on eBray). With its combination of manual controls and automated functions there is very little fiddling I have to do to get useful readings. The Agilent website has dowloadable manuals for those who want to dig into the details - Go to: http://cp.literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/05315-90021.pdf Arden Allen KB6NAX ------------------------------ Message-ID: <45E8EC5C.1080106@aafradio.org> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 22:32:44 -0500 From: AAFRadio MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Old Tube Radios CC: Old Tube Radios Subject: Re: Evaluate freq counters Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit John Sehring wrote: >I'm looking for guidance on evaluation freq counters. > I think others have covered most of what my experience has been, but I have to tell you that I don't use a frequency counter without it being connected to a scope. Arden's observation of the fickleness of the counters is spot on. Most of our beloved boatanchor scopes (I have a 546 and 549 that I use on a daily basis) have aux outputs, and my HP counter is permanently connected to the 546 because it sees the most use. The scope trace easily indicates whether the counter is telling you the truth about its reading. Best 73, Mike ------------------------------ Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 09:46:15 -0800 To: Old Tube Radios From: Scott Robinson Subject: Re: Evaluate freq counters Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" At 6:41 PM -0800 3/2/07, Arden Allen wrote: >John, the most common problem with digital frequency counters in my >experience is erroneous readings. You've touched on a couple, noise and >waveform distortion, and coupling problems. Simple counters with no means >of affecting input level, triggering slope, and AC or DC coupling can be >very frustraing to use because anything that needs to be done for the >counter to "see" the signal's fundamental frequency must be done externally. >Sometimes one needs to view a waveform on an oscilloscope to sort out the >problem with getting an accurate counter reading. and Scott coments: In some ways the most useful counter I have is built in to my Tek 2236 'scope. Since it counts trigger events, if the display is stable, the counter triggering is right, too, and you definitely see what you're triggering on. You can use a X10 probe and of course the scope has adjustable gain. I use it to speed up local oscillator alignment of radios by putting the probe near (but not connected to, that will move the frequency) the LO and adjusting the trimmers and padders for correct LO frequencies, having previously set the IF to the correct frequency. Regards, Scott ------------------------------ Message-ID: <001f01c75dce$032745a0$fa01fea9@Default> From: "David Stinson" To: Old Tube Radios Subject: Did You Get A Crystal Kit for you ART-13? Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 13:56:16 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Years ago, I sold a crystal-control conversion kit to someone on one of these lists. Right after I mailed it, life events lead me to put the majority of everything in storage, where it stayed for almost seven years. A few years ago, some of the parts for that kit "surfaced" from the chaos of storage and I managed to contact the buyer and send them along, but Father Time has now robbed me of who it was. Well, we've finally recovered and are back in a home, so the stuff is slowly coming out of storage. (got my SCR-287 back on the air and making QSOs at last; Hurry!). I found, down in the bottom of another old box, yet another bag of parts for that kit! It may be a long shot after all this time, but if you are the one that bought the kit, please send me an email so I can send you these pieces (bracket, some pre-made cables w/connectors and hardware). If I can't find the person, I'll send it to our resident ART-13-to-crystal expert in Houston ;-). 73 Dave S. ------------------------------ To: Old Tube Radios Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [ARC5] Did You Get A Crystal Kit for you ART-13? Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 16:26:49 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: jcoward5452@aol.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Message-Id: <8C92BF1CA030EE9-F24-9FA8@FWM-R20.sysops.aol.com> Is this the kit that enabled intallation of the CDA-T? (I am not the person you are looking for).But I would be interested to see the contents of that "legal" conversion kit.I sent my conversion documents to our friend in Houston some years ago.I recall a comment in the instruction sheet that 10 man-hours were required to do all the work. Jay KE6PPF -----Original Message----- From: arc5@ix.netcom.com To: boatanchors@theporch.com; milsurplus@mailman.qth.net; ARC5@mailman.qth.net Sent: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 11:56 AM Subject: [ARC5] Did You Get A Crystal Kit for you ART-13? Years ago, I sold a crystal-control conversion kit to someone on one of these lists. Right after I mailed it, life events lead me to put the majority of everything in storage, where it stayed for almost seven years. A few years ago, some of the parts for that kit "surfaced" from the chaos of storage and I managed to contact the buyer and send them along, but Father Time has now robbed me of who it was. Well, we've finally recovered and are back in a home, so the stuff is slowly coming out of storage. (got my SCR-287 back on the air and making QSOs at last; Hurry!). I found, down in the bottom of another old box, yet another bag of parts for that kit! It may be a long shot after all this time, but if you are the one that bought the kit, please send me an email so I can send you these pieces (bracket, some pre-made cables w/connectors and hardware). If I can't find the person, I'll send it to our resident ART-13-to-crystal expert in Houston ;-). 73 Dave S. _______________________________________________ ARC5 mailing list ARC5@mailman.qth.net http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5 ________________________________________________________________________ AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. ------------------------------ Message-ID: <20425493.1172958384514.JavaMail.root@mswamui-billy.atl.sa.earthlink.net> Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 21:46:24 +0000 (GMT+00:00) From: Richard Dillman To: Old Tube Radios Subject: K6KPH OTA for KSM Reports Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit K6KPH is on the air for KSM signal reports. Denice "DA" Stoops, first female operator at KPH is guarding 7050kc and 14050kc for KSM signal reports. KSM is transmitting on 4350.5, 6474.0, 12993 and 16914kc. As I tytpe, DA is busy handling traffic on the Alaska circuit to AL7N, Fairbanks but give her a call if you copy KSM - or even if you don't and you want to say howdy. VY 73, RD ================================= Richard Dillman, W6AWO Maritime Radio Historical Society http://www.radiomarine.org Collector of Harleys, Willys and Radios over 100lbs. ================================= ------------------------------ From: WA5CAB@cs.com Message-ID: Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 17:14:27 EST Subject: Re: [ARC5] Did You Get A Crystal Kit for you ART-13? To: Old Tube Radios MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_cba.c705455.331b4d43_boundary" --part1_cba.c705455.331b4d43_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jay, Dave may not be receiving, as I tried to send him a note earlier telling him when he got the original kit (from me) but it bounced - mailbox full. Yes, or part of it. Technically, a CDA-T consisted of the plug-in unit, all parts for converting a 52286 or T-47, and instructions. The parts list is sorta generic, in the sense that the couple of cable harnesses are called just that. And the kit didn't give details on how to make the harnesses nor part numbers of the added switch wafers. Other than that, the list shows a relay, a condenser, a couple of resistors and mostly hardware (bracket, and nuts, screws and washers). On the other hand, except for the sheet metal, the parts list of the plug-in is detailed, given relay, choke, etc. part numbers. FWIW, the HF/LF kit originally sold for $160.00, less tubes and crystals. That was circa 1948. Pete W. can comment on installation time. In a message dated 3/3/2007 3:27:29 PM Central Standard Time, jcoward5452@aol.com writes: > Is this the kit that enabled intallation of the CDA-T? (I am not the > person you are looking for).But I would be interested to see the > contents of that "legal" conversion kit.I sent my conversion documents > to our friend in Houston some years ago.I recall a comment in the > instruction sheet that 10 man-hours were required to do all the work. > Jay KE6PPF > -----Original Message----- > From: arc5@ix.netcom.com > To: boatanchors@theporch.com; milsurplus@mailman.qth.net; > ARC5@mailman.qth.net > Sent: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 11:56 AM > Subject: [ARC5] Did You Get A Crystal Kit for you ART-13? > > Years ago, I sold a crystal-control conversion kit to someone > on one of these lists. Right after I mailed it, > life events lead me to put the majority of everything in storage, > where it stayed for almost seven years. A few years ago, > some of the parts for that kit "surfaced" from the chaos of storage > and I managed to contact the buyer and send them along, > but Father Time has now robbed me of who it was. > Well, we've finally recovered and are back in a home, > so the stuff is slowly coming out of storage. > (got my SCR-287 back on the air and making QSOs > at last; Hurry!). > > I found, down in the bottom of another old box, > yet another bag of parts for that kit! > It may be a long shot after all this time, but if you are > the one that bought the kit, please send me an > email so I can send you these pieces (bracket, > some pre-made cables w/connectors and hardware). > If I can't find the person, I'll send it to our > resident ART-13-to-crystal expert in Houston ;-). Robert & Susan Downs - Houston (Web Store) MVPA 9480 (Primary email) (Backup email) --part1_cba.c705455.331b4d43_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ---REMAINDER OF MESSAGE TRUNCATED--- * * This post contains a forbidden message format * * (such as an attached file, a v-card, HTML formatting) * * Mail Lists at theporch.com only accept PLAIN TEXT * * If your postings display this message your mail program * * is not set to send PLAIN TEXT ONLY and needs adjusting * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * --part1_cba.c705455.331b4d43_boundary-- ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 17:34:58 -0600 (CST) From: Bob Roehrig To: Old Tube Radios Cc: Old Tube Radios Subject: Re: Evaluate freq counters Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed On Sat, 3 Mar 2007, Scott Robinson wrote: > In some ways the most useful counter I have is built in to my Tek 2236 > 'scope. Totally agree with that Scott. I have one also. Only problem I have is that the internal clock is a bit off (I don't have a manual so not sre about adjusting it if possible). WOuld be really great to feed in my house standard as the time base for it. Bob Roehrig Aurora University Telecom dept. broehrig@aurora.edu K9EUI W9ZGP WD2XSH/19 630-844-4898 fax 630-844-4222 "Nostalgia is a thing of the past" ------------------------------ From: "Rodger" To: Old Tube Radios Subject: RE: Evaluate freq counters Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 17:55:16 -0600 Message-ID: <000701c75def$648d0980$4b02640a@D1JXNQ31> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable You guys are so hi-tech :) I am reduced to using the vertical signal = out connector on the back of my Tek 7854 to feed an external HP 5254L = counter. The built in waveform processor/calculator is a little awkward to use as = a frequency counter for these types of adjustments. Rodger WQ9E > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-boatanchors@theporch.com [mailto:owner- > boatanchors@theporch.com] On Behalf Of Bob Roehrig > Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 5:35 PM > To: Old Tube Radios > Cc: Old Tube Radios > Subject: Re: Evaluate freq counters >=20 > On Sat, 3 Mar 2007, Scott Robinson wrote: >=20 > > In some ways the most useful counter I have is built in to my Tek = 2236 > > 'scope. >=20 > Totally agree with that Scott. I have one also. Only problem I have is > that the internal clock is a bit off (I don't have a manual so not sre > about adjusting it if possible). WOuld be really great to feed in my = house > standard as the time base for it. >=20 > Bob Roehrig > Aurora University Telecom dept. > broehrig@aurora.edu > K9EUI W9ZGP WD2XSH/19 > 630-844-4898 fax 630-844-4222 > "Nostalgia is a thing of the past" ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 18:12:51 -0600 (CST) From: Bob Roehrig To: Old Tube Radios Cc: 'Old Tube Radios' Subject: RE: Evaluate freq counters Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed On Sat, 3 Mar 2007, Rodger wrote: > You guys are so hi-tech :) I am reduced to using the vertical signal out > connector on the back of my Tek 7854 to feed an external HP 5254L counter. > The built in waveform processor/calculator is a little awkward to use as a > frequency counter for these types of adjustments. Back in the "old days" I added a vertical output to my Heath scope just so I could attach a counter as you do. That worked just fine. Nice to be able to see what you are counting and take advantage of the 10:1 probe and the scope's variable vertical gain. Bob Roehrig Aurora University Telecom dept. broehrig@aurora.edu K9EUI W9ZGP WD2XSH/19 630-844-4898 fax 630-844-4222 "Nostalgia is a thing of the past" ------------------------------ From: "Ed Sieb" To: Old Tube Radios Subject: AM boatanchors galore! "Every Single Minute" Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 22:15:37 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit AM boatanchors galore! "Every Single Minute" Cross-posted from another list... Ed, VA3ES ---------------------------------------- >From Bob, W9RAN: Wow, I had no idea this film existed - but if you've got 22 minutes and broadband - it's the neatest collection of late 50's era ham radio operation I've ever seen: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2943570522939177086&hl=en You have to endure the interview for the first 5 minutes or so - then it gets into a 1959 publicity film for the Phil Mont Mobile Radio Club of Philadelphia which shows actual hams running their home and mobile 10 meter rigs - Johnsons, Gonsets, Hallicrafters - the works. Actual footage, not just interviews! Very cool and I just wish there were a way to download it off Google - anyone know? Kudos to Rick W9WS who posted this to another list today. 73, Bob W9RAN ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 11:04:56 -0500 To: Old Tube Radios From: John Dilks K2TQN Subject: Eudora Email users - Important info Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Message-Id: <20070304161104.553BB187AE7@srvr1.theporch.com> I use and love Eudora for Email. I have used the sponsored version for many years. I recently noticed the ads were not coming up and checked their home page. It appears the sponsored version is going away. Users will need to -either- get the paid version ($19.95) or on April 30, the sponsored version will become the "free version." The free version is still good, but it has less features. If you like Eudora, I recommend paying the $19.95 and you will be able to use it forever. (make sure you save your registration number.) To pay, go to the help tab and select Payment and Registration. It took me less than 5 minutes and the registration number popped into the program automatically. I hate the Microsoft email programs because of past virus problems. This is why I'm sticking with Eudora. Disclaimer: I have no financial interests in Eudora. 73, John Dilks, K2TQN ------------------------------ From: "Meir WF2U" To: Old Tube Radios Subject: RE: Eudora Email users - Important info Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 11:27:47 -0500 Message-ID: <016001c75e7a$0f1c9160$0300a8c0@MBDCONSULTING.LOCAL> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Why don't you look into Mozilla Thunderbird? It's free and it's an excellent e-mail client, with powerful features. In fact, it has all the features of MS Outlook (not Express) and some more. 73, Meir WF2U Landrum, SC -----Original Message----- From: owner-boatanchors@theporch.com [mailto:owner-boatanchors@theporch.com] On Behalf Of John Dilks K2TQN Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 11:05 AM To: Old Tube Radios Subject: Eudora Email users - Important info I use and love Eudora for Email. I have used the sponsored version for many years. I recently noticed the ads were not coming up and checked their home page. It appears the sponsored version is going away. Users will need to -either- get the paid version ($19.95) or on April 30, the sponsored version will become the "free version." The free version is still good, but it has less features. If you like Eudora, I recommend paying the $19.95 and you will be able to use it forever. (make sure you save your registration number.) To pay, go to the help tab and select Payment and Registration. It took me less than 5 minutes and the registration number popped into the program automatically. I hate the Microsoft email programs because of past virus problems. This is why I'm sticking with Eudora. Disclaimer: I have no financial interests in Eudora. 73, John Dilks, K2TQN -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.6/709 - Release Date: 3/3/2007 8:12 AM ------------------------------ Message-ID: <45EAFB90.30803@mindspring.com> Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 12:02:08 -0500 From: Garey Barrell MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Old Tube Radios Subject: Re: Eudora Email users - Important info Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1250; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Or, SeaMonkey, and get rid of IE7 as well. 73, Garey - K4OAH Atlanta Drake 2-B, 4-B & C-Line Service Supplement CDs Meir WF2U wrote: > Why don't you look into Mozilla Thunderbird? > It's free and it's an excellent e-mail client, with powerful features. > In fact, it has all the features of MS Outlook (not Express) and some more. > > 73, Meir WF2U > Landrum, SC > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-boatanchors@theporch.com [mailto:owner-boatanchors@theporch.com] > On Behalf Of John Dilks K2TQN > Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 11:05 AM > To: Old Tube Radios > Subject: Eudora Email users - Important info > > > I use and love Eudora for Email. I have used the sponsored version > for many years. I recently noticed the ads were not coming up and > checked their home page. > > > ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 20:49:35 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry Proc Subject: 1980's Radio Systems Material Posted To: Old Tube Radios MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <272828.33281.qm@web90603.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Hello Everyone, After a 6 week effort, I have posted a rather substantial update to my web page on Radio Communications in the RCN. Basically it's a snapshot of the radio technology used by the RCN during the 1980's. For anyone who might find this of interest, go to: http://www.jproc.ca/rrp/ In the section titled RADIO FITS OF THE MID 1980's, the information has been posted into 9 subsections. Intro LF/MF/HF Receiver Systems MF/HF Transmitters VHF/UHF/Satellite Systems Antennas Teletype, Message Handling Systems and Crypto Remote Control Equipment Miscellaneous Equipment ADLIPS, Link 11/14 and Other Systems That' quite a bit of sandstate but there is some hollowstate gear in among the brew :-) -- Regards, Jerry Proc E-mail: jerry7proc@yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:13:48 -0500 (EST) From: stuck in 50s Message-Id: <200703051313.l25DDmnk026182@fracas.netboobie.org> To: Old Tube Radios Subject: RE: Eudora Email users - Important info > Why don't you look into Mozilla Thunderbird? > It's free and it's an excellent e-mail client, with powerful features. > In fact, it has all the features of MS Outlook (not Express) and some more. > The spam blocker in Outlook is infantile. Seems to work on expected textual layouts. NO WAY TO TRAIN IT like the Graham/Bayes methods in MacMail or Google Mail. Or unix spamassisin/bogofilter. Thunderbired does spam right. Marty ------------------------------ From: wb3fau@att.net To: Old Tube Radios Subject: looking for Allan Culbert Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 15:35:01 +0000 Message-Id: <030520071535.4037.45EC38A4000A0D2C00000FC521604666489A0E00CC0D99@att.net> unable to contact directly concerning a transaction, so looking here to see if he gets messages from here? Russ. ------------------------------ Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 From: John Sehring To: Old Tube Radios Subject: Part 97 of FCC rules Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20070305182158.538691F249B@filter6.e-filtering.net> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 11:21:58 -0700 (MST) Thank you the many who answered my question, you put me on the right track. Here's the actual reg on my question about needing a stateside address for maintaining a US ham ticket: [Code of Federal Regulations] [Title 47, Volume 5] [Revised as of October 1, 2006] >From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access [CITE: 47CFR97.23] [Page 577] TITLE 47--TELECOMMUNICATION CHAPTER I--FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (CONTINUED) PART 97_AMATEUR RADIO SERVICE--Table of Contents Subpart A_General Provisions Sec. 97.23 Mailing address. Each license grant must show the grantee's correct name and mailing address. The mailing address must be in an area where the amateur service is regulated by the FCC and where the grantee can receive mail delivery by the United States Postal Service. Revocation of the station license or suspension of the operator license may result when correspondence from the FCC is returned as undeliverable because the grantee failed to provide the correct mailing address. [63 FR 68979, Dec. 14, 1998] --John Sehring WB0EQ/VE6 ------------------------------ End of BOATANCHORS Digest 4025 ******************************