Daily GLOWBUGS
Digest: V1 #21
via AB4EL Web Digests @ SunSITE
Purpose: building and operating vacuum tube-based QRP rigs
Subject: glowbugs V1 #21
glowbugs Friday, May 2 1997 Volume 01 : Number 021
Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 08:43:27 -0700 (MST)
From: Jeff Duntemann <jeffd@coriolis.com>
Subject: Re: AN/GRC-109
At 04:04 PM 4/30/97 -0700, you wrote:
>On Wed, 30 Apr 1997, Brian Carling (Radio G3XLQ / AF4K) wrote:
>
>> Is Fair Radio completely out of these things?
>> They were selling them cheap last year and I was about to buy one but
>> they dropped the ad!
>
>They still have complete sets. I called about 2 weeks ago. Their '97
>catalogue still has them listed.
Lotsa chatter about this unit, which I've never seen and know nothing
about. Could someone who has one or knows it characterize this radio?
I've never owned a military set (apart from any number of Command chassis
with nothing much left on 'em) and might like to get one.
- --73--
- --Jeff Duntemann KG7JF
Scottsdale, Arizona
Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 08:55:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
Subject: Re: Svetlana Tube
I remember Walt Polete of Lolo, Montana built a 300 watt crystal
oscillator by judicious use of an 813 in an electron coupled circuit.
Kenneth G. Gordon W7EKB College of Mines and Earth Resources
226 N. Washington St. //or// University of Idaho
Moscow, Idaho 83843 Moscow, Idaho 83844
(208)-882-8745 (208)-885-6133
Great Highland Pipes, Amateur Radio, Electronic Consulting, Home-Schooling
Traditional Roman Catholic
My PGP Public Key Upon Request.
Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 09:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
Subject: Re: AN/GRC-109
> >They still have complete sets. I called about 2 weeks ago. Their '97
> >catalogue still has them listed.
On page 19.
>
> Lotsa chatter about this unit, which I've never seen and know nothing
> about. Could someone who has one or knows it characterize this radio?
> I've never owned a military set (apart from any number of Command chassis
> with nothing much left on 'em) and might like to get one.
"Miniaturized" tube set. Separate rx, tx, powersupplies. Covers 3-24 mHz.
Rx continous coverage on 3 bands. Tx crystal controlled, on 4 bands.
Built in hand key on transmitter which also acts as the antenna changeover
switch. Full QSK (break-in). 6AC7 osc, 2E26 final. 8.5 inches wide, 5.5
inches deep 5.5 inches high. 75 to 260 VAC @ 40-400 Hz input. Antenna
coupling circuit in transmitter covers very wide range of impedances.
Uses 2 neon lamps and a #47 for tune up. Rx uses 1T4s and 1U5
Tx is #25.00, rx is $60.00, pp is $35.00. Has hand cranked genny available
(GN-58), and (sometimes) an itty bitty gasoline powered genny (engine
looks like an large model airplane engine). Also a 6/12/24 volt dynamotor
available.
Xeroxed manual for it for $10.00 from Fair.
73,
Ken W7EKB
Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 09:05:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
Subject: Re: AN/GRC-109
Oh, forgot one thing. It was originally designed and built for the
Special Forces as the AN/GRC-109 and for the CIA as the RS-1. Very rugged
and reliable little unit. Cute too.
Kenneth G. Gordon W7EKB College of Mines and Earth Resources
226 N. Washington St. //or// University of Idaho
Moscow, Idaho 83843 Moscow, Idaho 83844
(208)-882-8745 (208)-885-6133
Great Highland Pipes, Amateur Radio, Electronic Consulting, Home-Schooling
Traditional Roman Catholic
My PGP Public Key Upon Request.
Date: Thu, 01 May 1997 09:36:26 -0700
From: Walt Turansky <turansky@xroads.com>
Subject: Re: Svetlana Tube
At 09:15 AM 5/1/97 -0400, you wrote:
>Seeing the blurbs over the last couple days about Svetlana tubes reminded me
>of a project on my list of things to do. I'm ordering an SV811-10 today. Hate
>to spend 30 bucks on a tube but I'd like to have a bit more than the approx.
>2.5 watts output that I get when using 6SN7's and such in Hartleys.
I've been running an 80 meter Hartley with a 6336A and getting about 6-7
watts out so I've been thinking along the same lines. Last week I was given
an HF-100 (T-100) 75 watt triode that I am planning to build a 40 meter
Hartley with. Yesterday, I ordered an 812A pull from CWest for $15.75 to
put in the 80 meter Hartley. I will also report the results.
73 de N7QFN
Walt
Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 14:05:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: EWoodman@aol.com
Subject: Re: Svetlana Tube
Walt,
I had thought about a 40M Hartley. I've only used them on 80 and 160 and was
a bit concerned about stability and such on anything higher. I know others
have run them up on 30M recently and even higher in the "old days". Maybe
with good rock solid construction ..........? Mine are all built like tanks
anyway!
73 Eric KA1YRV
Date: Thu, 01 May 1997 11:26:38 -0700
From: Walt Turansky <turansky@xroads.com>
Subject: 40M Hartley (was Svetlana tube)
Eric,
I have the same concern on stability and haven't tried it yet so maybe Bob
or someone else that's tried it can comment. My 80M is built on a
breadboard and wired with #12 buss wire. I used transmiiting mica tubs for
fixed caps and variables were pulled from a TU-7 tuning unit. The tank coil
is 1/4" copper tubing. I intend to replicate this construction on the 40M
version.
>I had thought about a 40M Hartley. I've only used them on 80 and 160 and was
>a bit concerned about stability and such on anything higher. I know others
>have run them up on 30M recently and even higher in the "old days". Maybe
>with good rock solid construction ..........? Mine are all built like tanks
>anyway!
73 de N7QFN
Walt
Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 12:27:39 -0600 (MDT)
From: owens@stout.atd.ucar.edu (Chip Owens)
Subject: e-mail address for Fair Radio
Hi There,
Could someone please send me the e-mail address for Fair Radio?
I'm sitting out here in the oilfields of Kansas and don't have any
search engines available-lucky to be able to do e-mail over a very
slow modem, Has anyone received the new Fair catalog?
Thanks! Chip Owens, NW0O
Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 11:50:28 -0700
From: "James H. Haynes" <haynes@cats.ucsc.edu>
Subject: Re: e-mail address for Fair Radio
fairadio@alpha.wcoil.com
Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 20:43:13 +0000
From: Sandy W5TVW <ebjr@worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: 40M Hartley (was Svetlana tube)
At 06:26 PM 5/1/97 +0000, you wrote:
>>I had thought about a 40M Hartley. I've only used them on 80 and 160 and was
>>a bit concerned about stability and such on anything higher. I know others
>>have run them up on 30M recently and even higher in the "old days". Maybe
>>with good rock solid construction ..........? Mine are all built like tanks
>>anyway!
>73 de N7QFN
>Walt
>
> I have one using a single '10 from a 1928 ARRL Handbook design. I
have the tank coils interchangeable. (They are screwed down to ceramic
pillar standoofs)
The cathode tap is by means of a small Meuller #45C copper battery clip. It is
very stable as far as thermal drift goes. I power it with a Heathkit IP-17
regulated
power supply using 6.3v. AC on the filament (going to 7.5 volts makes no
difference!)
and 400-425 volts on the plate. The oscillator works very well on 40!
(With the big 5 turn tank coil) I think it would probably work on 30
meters too, but I haven't tried it yet! I think any of the "big" receiving
triodes would work OK.
73,
E. V. Sandy Blaize, W5TVW
"Boat Anchors collected, restored, repaired, traded and used!"
417 Ridgewood Drive,
Metairie, LA., 70001
ebjr@worldnet.att.net
**Looking for: 860 tubes, WL-460 tubes**
**Butternut HF2V antenna, G-R test gear.....................***
Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 14:25:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
Subject: Re: e-mail address for Fair Radio
On Thu, 1 May 1997, Chip Owens wrote:
> Hi There,
>
> Could someone please send me the e-mail address for Fair Radio?
Their e-mail address is:
fairadio@alpha.wcoil.com
URL is
http://alpha.wcoil.com/~fairadio/
> I'm sitting out here in the oilfields of Kansas and don't have any
> search engines available-lucky to be able to do e-mail over a very
> slow modem, Has anyone received the new Fair catalog?
I have their 1996 catalog and their fall 1996 supplement. New catalog due
out soon.
Ken W7EKB.
Every time I get a new one, I do through it and after my order reaches
$10,000, I say to myself, "Oh, well...maybe next time." :-)
Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 16:47:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
Subject: Re: 40M Hartley (was Svetlana tube)
You wouldn't just happen to have a schematic/pictures/etc? It sounds like
fun. 1/4" copper tubing should make a nice tank coil. Is this a TPTG
design or a straight Hartley VFO ?
Do you use an antenna coupler between it and the antenna? Does it chirp?
Where do you key it? Cathode?
I wonder if I could get one of my old 304TLs to work in such a circuit?
Probably get killed in the process! :-)
Lessee...I have some 8000s, an 811 or two, some 805s and some 803s, and
power supplies for them.
73,
Ken W7EKB
Date: Fri, 02 May 1997 01:35:02 GMT
From: wallace@world.std.com (Andy Wallace)
Subject: 1935 Shortwave Digest -- Free! (with catch)
Hmm. A fellow at our local SWL club passed this on to me a while ago.=20
I finally took the time to look it over.
Seems like an interesting little (5x7") mag by E. A. Conklin. This one
is 50 pages long and has ads for things like the RME-69, Patterson
PR-16, The New Super Skyrider, and the Eilen HFA-35 transmitter.
(There's a new one for your wantlist, John Brewer!)
Articles review the Halli Super Seven, RCA AR-60 (darn, I passed one
of those up for $15 two years ago), and the RME-69, and McMurdo Silver
does a review of Jones' SUPER GAINER 3-tube superhet/regen but Conklin
forgot to include the schematic!
Anyway, a handful of interesting reading. Free to someone who will
send me something interesting to read in return! An old copy of Short
Wave Craft (need not be mint), a schematic of their favorite glowbug
or regen project, what have you? Unfortunately I only have one copy so
I may entreat the "winner" with a list of people to pass the copy on
to after he/she is done!
Email address is below.=20
- --Andy
wallace@world.std.com
- ---
Curly: Oh....short wave?
Moe: No! Poimanent.=20
<BONK!>
(THEY STOOGE TO CONGA, 1943)
Date: Thu, 01 May 1997 21:48:04 EDT
From: ac4gt@juno.com (nathan c tart)
Subject: TEST
TEST of the ROUND ROBIN
End
Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 20:57:23 -0500 (CDT)
From: mjsilva@ix.netcom.com (michael silva)
Subject: Re: AN/GRC-109
I'm not familiar with this set but I did look it up in the Fair Radio
catalog and it has a very familiar-sounding tube lineup: 6AC7 (kind of
a baby VHF 6AG7) and 2E26 (kind of a baby VHF 6L6). Sounds like a
Novice-style rig with 15 and 10 meter ambitions. Perhaps somebody
could scan or otherwise enter the circuit and add it to the growing
glowbugs collection.
73,
Mike, KK6GM
Date: Fri, 2 May 1997 03:39:12 EST
From: k7sz@juno.com (Richard H. Arland)
Subject: Re: AN/GRC-109
Gang:
The AN/GRC-109 is a late 50s thru mid 60s military radio set used by US
Special Forces and the CIA (although the CIA version is slightly
different on the TX and is called, I believe, the RS-1)
The T-784/GRC-109 TX puts out about 10 to 15 watts of CW only covering
3-22 mc in four bands. It is xtal controlled (FT-243 or the larger
rocks....the smaller HC-16 or 25 holders won't work) and has a straight
key afixed to the top. Tuning is done by small lamps that are tuned for
max brightness by the "Exciter", "PA", and "Antenna" tuning controls. The
primary difference between the RS-1 (CIA version) and the T-784./GRC-109
(Green Beanie version) is the AN/GRA-71 (Angry-71) burst encoder which
allows the clandestine operator to preload his CW mssg (encrypted, of
course) and fire it off in a 300 WPM burst. Tube compliment: Osc: 6AC7,
PA: 2E26.
The R-1004/GRC-109 RX is a 3-22 mc (in 3 bands) superhet receiver that
uses 1 volt tubes. It features a VERY nice vernier tuning control and
fairly accurate analog readout. It has a 6dB bandwidth of about 9 kc and
will receive CW/AM or SSB. It uses 2K ohm headphones and can be used with
a seperate antenna or coupled to the T-748 transmitter by a short jumper
to use a single antenna. Tube compliment: RF Amp: 1T4, Mixer: 1L6, 1st IF
Amp: 1T4, 2nd IF Amp: 1T4, Detector/AF: amp 1U5, BFO: 1T4.
AThe PP-2684/GRC-109 psu (also called the "large power supply")is a
75-260 volt AC (40-400 cps) power supply that can also work from a 6 volt
DC battery (has an internal vibrator supply) and supplies 450 VDC to the
TX along with 108 VDC to the receiver and associated filaments and bias
voltages. In addition, this psu can also be coupled to the G-43G hand
crank generator to supply power to the GRC-109 radio set. This sucker
weighs a ton!
The PP-2685/GRC-109 psu is the "small power supply" and has all the
features of the PP-2684 EXCEPT for the 6 volt DC input and associated
vibrator supply. and it cannot be operated from the G-43G hand crank
generator. It is an AC ONLY psu.
These radios sets are available from Fair Radio Sales....cost me about
$130 for the three pieces and shipping. They are used...the ad in the
catalog says they are "used repairable" but my stuff worked fine right
out of the box. This is NOT a very portable set.....it is more "luggable"
than "portable".
They are a real hoot to use. Brings out the Walter Mitty in all of us!
73 rich K7SZ
Date: Fri, 02 May 1997 00:45:40 -0800
From: "catherine a dumar westelcom.com" <cjdumar@westelcom.com>
Subject: Re: AN/GRC-109
:I'm not familiar with this set but I did look it up in the Fair
:Radio catalog and it has a very familiar-sounding tube lineup:
:6AC7 (kind of a baby VHF 6AG7) and 2E26 (kind of a baby VHF 6L6).
:Sounds like a Novice-style rig with 15 and 10 meter ambitions.
:Perhaps somebody could scan or otherwise enter the circuit and add
:it to the growing glowbugs collection.
:73,
:Mike, KK6GM
the thing is marginal at 15M and worthless on 10M (refering to mine). Where
the rig shines is on 80, 40, 30, and 20M.
Charlie, KA2VCS (cjdumar@westelcom.com)
Graphic Artist seeks Boss with vision impairment.
Net-Tamer V 1.09 Beta - Registered
Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 23:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
Subject: Re: AN/GRC-109
> I'm not familiar with this set but I did look it up in the Fair Radio
> catalog and it has a very familiar-sounding tube lineup: 6AC7 (kind of
> a baby VHF 6AG7)
6AG7 has much higher transconductance and plate dissipation. Otherwise,
6AC7 makes an excellent oscillator.
> and 2E26 (kind of a baby VHF 6L6).
Actually, a baby 6146.
> Sounds like a
> Novice-style rig with 15 and 10 meter ambitions.
Won't do 10 meters. Goes to 24 mHz. Is "hollow-state" so relatively
impervious to EMP.
> Perhaps somebody
> could scan or otherwise enter the circuit and add it to the growing
> glowbugs collection.
Hmmmmm. I have the complete manual. Could scan the schematics of rx, tx
and powersupplies. Where would I put them?
73,
Ken W7EKB
Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 23:45:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
Subject: Re: AN/GRC-109
Gang:
This unit will use the same power sources as the older AN/GRC-9, including
its GN-58 Hand cranked genny, the little gasoline powered generator (which
I forget the nomenclature for), and the 6/12/24 volt dynamotor. There is
even a cable with a little box in it containing a 108 volt regulator tube
to go between the GN-58 and the R-1004/T-784.
Kenneth G. Gordon W7EKB College of Mines and Earth Resources
226 N. Washington St. //or// University of Idaho
Moscow, Idaho 83843 Moscow, Idaho 83844
(208)-882-8745 (208)-885-6133
Great Highland Pipes, Amateur Radio, Electronic Consulting, Home-Schooling
Traditional Roman Catholic
My PGP Public Key Upon Request.
Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 23:46:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
Subject: Re: AN/GRC-109
Gang:
I have worked 35 countries with mine, mostly on 40, some on 20, ONE on 15.
It won't do 10.
Kenneth G. Gordon W7EKB College of Mines and Earth Resources
226 N. Washington St. //or// University of Idaho
Moscow, Idaho 83843 Moscow, Idaho 83844
(208)-882-8745 (208)-885-6133
Great Highland Pipes, Amateur Radio, Electronic Consulting, Home-Schooling
Traditional Roman Catholic
My PGP Public Key Upon Request.
Date: Fri, 2 May 1997 07:53:02 -0500 (CDT)
From: mjsilva@ix.netcom.com (michael silva)
Subject: Re: AN/GRC-109
>
>> I'm not familiar with this set but I did look it up in the Fair
>>Radio catalog and it has a very familiar-sounding tube lineup: 6AC7
>>(kind of a baby VHF 6AG7)
>
>6AG7 has much higher transconductance and plate dissipation.
>Otherwise, 6AC7 makes an excellent oscillator.
At 9000 and 11000 umhos they're both pretty anxious to please. I've
been told that the 6AC7 (which I haven't cut open) has the same
parallel plate construction as the 6AG7 (which I have -- it's one of my
"what's inside a tube" demos).
>
>> and 2E26 (kind of a baby VHF 6L6).
>
>Actually, a baby 6146.
When introduced in 1947 the RCA literature referred to the 2E26 as a
"very high frequency version of the 6L6". The 6146 didn't appear until
5 years later.
>> Perhaps somebody
>> could scan or otherwise enter the circuit and add it to the growing
>> glowbugs collection.
>
>Hmmmmm. I have the complete manual. Could scan the schematics of rx,
>tx and powersupplies. Where would I put them?
NA4G seems to be the keeper of the glowbugs circuit archives. Bob, can
you help out here?
73,
Mike, KK6GM
Date: Fri, 02 May 1997 09:50:40 -0400
From: Roy Morgan <morgan@speckle.ncsl.nist.gov>
Subject: Re: e-mail address for Fair Radio
At 11:50 AM 5/1/97 -0700, you wrote:
>fairadio@alpha.wcoil.com
>
>
Their WWW page is:
http://alpha.wcoil.com:80/~fairadio/
- -- Roy Morgan/Building 820, Room 517/Gaithersburg MD 20899
(National Institute of Standards and Technology)
301-975-3254 Fax: 301-948-6213 morgan@speckle.ncsl.nist.gov --
Date: Fri, 02 May 1997 10:28:52 -0400
From: Roy Morgan <morgan@speckle.ncsl.nist.gov>
Subject: Re: AN/GRC-109
At 03:39 AM 5/2/97 EST, you wrote:
>Gang:
>
>The AN/GRC-109 is a late 50s thru mid 60s military radio set used by US
>Special Forces and the CIA
(great info snipped)
>
>They are a real hoot to use. Brings out the Walter Mitty in all of us!
A friend of mine has one of these sets. We are fortunate to live in the
Washington, DC area, and because of this we were able to properly test the
set. Our experiences may be of interest to other Glowbuggers. The most
desireable conditions for operation are illustrated below:
1) We found a proper location, across the Potomac River from the DIA
headquarters compound, in a swampy drainage ditch beneath the George
Washington Expressway, in the vicinity of the Pentagon. The knee-deep muck
and thick summer vegitation provided a fine ground connection, and
camoflage, respectively. The pitiful condition of the roadway overhead
caused the heavy traffic to occasionally throw stones onto our heads, thus
simulating more fully the original 1960's operating conditions.
2) Power source: We had scouted the site earlier and discoverd a smashed
lamp pole with exposed power wires. A couple of battery clips and a
100-foot length of zip cord allowed us to operate the rig on the ac power
supply.
3) Antenna installation: Because of construction on the Parkway, a medium
sized trailer had been parked in the trees near the operating swamp. A
thin insulated wire snaked through the underbrush was connected to the
corner of the trailer. For grounding, we simply pushed the transmitter
half way down into the mud at the edge of the water-filled ditch. The
whole system seemed to load up pretty well.
4) Operations: The one and only QSO we managed is recorded below, with
certan parts redacted in accordance with applicable security regulations:
CQ CQ CQ DE SW3AMP SW3AMP
(nothing heard)
CQ CQ CQ DE SW3AMP SW3AMP
(VERY strong signal appeared on the frequency, with no discernable tuning
up.):
SW3WAM DE BOSS SW3AMP DE BOSS K
BOSS DE SW3AMP R R FB SIG OM BT HWCPY? BOSS DE SW3AMP
SW3AMP DE BOSS AUTHENTICATE T6U2Q K
BOSS DE SW3AMP R R SRY OM UMABLE TO AUTHENTICATE BT CODE BOOK FELL IN SWAMP
BT HW CPY K
SW3AMP DE BOSS R R WAIT OUT
At this time, there was a long pause in the transmission, and we noticed
the sound of sirens, apparently coming from the direction of the South
Parking Lot at the Pentagon. We held a short tactics discussion, and
decided to QRT for the day. We hastily packed up our station, and headed
for the Crystal City Marriot for refreshments.
Keep em glowing!
Roy, K1LKY since 1959.
- -- Roy Morgan/Building 820, Room 517/Gaithersburg MD 20899
(National Institute of Standards and Technology)
301-975-3254 Fax: 301-948-6213 morgan@speckle.ncsl.nist.gov --
Date: Fri, 2 May 1997 08:20:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: tomrice@netcom.com (Tom R. Rice)
Subject: Xtal Group Buy: Time's Running Out
Forwarded message:
>
> > Subject: CRYSTAL GROUP BUY
> > From: n0acs@juno.com (John R. Morris)
> > Date: Fri, 02 May 1997 00:12:27 EDT
> >
>
> > I was wondering if you could post a msg. over on the boatanchors for me
> > to the effect that I am honoring xtal group buy orders postmarked thru
> > Sat. 3rd. of May. That there's only 2 days left to order.
>
> > I've appreciated the orders I've gotten from their group and wanted to be
> > sure they all had an opportunity to get their orders placed before the
> > deadline ran out.
>
> > Also thank them for their support.
>
> > 73 John-PHOENIX CRYSTALS
> >
> The group buy referred to concerns greatly reduced
> prices for a set of xtals. If you are interested,
> please e-mail John at the above address for details.
>
> He doesn't have sufficient I-net access for him to
> actually be on the list.
>
> 73 de WB6BYH
>
> --
> "Start off every day with a smile and get it over with." --W.C.Fields
> Tom R. Rice
> tomrice@netcom.com
> CIS: 71160,1122
Date: Fri, 2 May 1997 08:23:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
Subject: Re: AN/GRC-109
> >6AG7 has much higher transconductance and plate dissipation.
> >Otherwise, 6AC7 makes an excellent oscillator.
>
> At 9000 and 11000 umhos they're both pretty anxious to please. I've
> been told that the 6AC7 (which I haven't cut open) has the same
> parallel plate construction as the 6AG7 (which I have -- it's one of my
> "what's inside a tube" demos).
I was not aware of that. I like both tubes, but my favorite of the two is
the 6AG7.
> >
> >> and 2E26 (kind of a baby VHF 6L6).
> >
> >Actually, a baby 6146.
>
> When introduced in 1947 the RCA literature referred to the 2E26 as a
> "very high frequency version of the 6L6". The 6146 didn't appear until
> 5 years later.
Ah. I was not aware of THAT either! Thanks. I never really cared for the
6L6 as an oscillator because the suppressor grid is tied internally to
the cathode which precludes stable ECO operation of it. As far as I was
concerned, it is a bigger 6V6. They both make decent amps, but not so hot
oscillators. The internal construction of the 2E26 is more similar to the
6146 than to the 6L6. Maybe it was an experimental, miniature, 6146
?????? :-)
>
> >> Perhaps somebody
> >> could scan or otherwise enter the circuit and add it to the growing
> >> glowbugs collection.
> >
> >Hmmmmm. I have the complete manual. Could scan the schematics of rx,
> >tx and powersupplies. Where would I put them?
>
> NA4G seems to be the keeper of the glowbugs circuit archives. Bob, can
> you help out here?
I also administer an anonymous FTP site which has free hard-drive space if
that would prove useful to this list.
73,
Ken W7EKB
Date: Fri, 2 May 1997 11:24:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: EWoodman@aol.com
Subject: Re: Svetlana Tube
>Bob Keys has digitized a 1934 QST article, and added info for use of the
>6SN7 tube.
I have a 160 rig based on that article and use a 6SN7 in it. Works fine. I
also have one that is a very simple shunt-fed Hartley. I kind of like the
shunt-fed ones because it keeps the hv dc off the tank circuit and is
dirt-simple to build. Matter of fact if you use something like a 6CG7
(miniaturized 6SN7), a small B&W or Airdux type coil, and a small
transmitting variable, you can make a nice midget shunt-fed Hartley that will
fit in the palm of your hand and put out around 2 watts. Couple that with a
midget regen also using a 6CG7 and you could put the whole station in your
briefcase with room to spare!!
Eric
Date: Fri, 2 May 1997 08:37:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
Subject: Re: AN/GRC-109
> At this time, there was a long pause in the transmission, and we noticed
> the sound of sirens, apparently coming from the direction of the South
> Parking Lot at the Pentagon. We held a short tactics discussion, and
> decided to QRT for the day. We hastily packed up our station, and headed
> for the Crystal City Marriot for refreshments.
>
Hee hee! Neat story.
I recently did a search for "AN/GRC-109" and discovered a message from an
old Sneaky Pete SFC about them. He called them " Lieutenant Powered" and
recalled, with considerable affection how he had " ...made comm..." with
headquarters in Georgia from an operation in Montana using a barbed wire
fence for the antenna.
He told me that the later types weren't as good since they were not "
...full duplex..." (his words, probably meaning the same as "...full
QSK.." to us), and they had to use two of them together to get the same
results as one GRC-109.
Some fun!!!
Date: Fri, 2 May 1997 10:41:18 -0500 (CDT)
From: Chris Broadbent <cfb@bga.com>
Subject: TEST - my messages aren't getting through
This is just a test. I sent two messages but have not seen them echoed.
Ah, the trials of modern technology :-).
- --
Cheers,
Chris F. Broadbent ( KC5VQL )
Date: Fri, 2 May 1997 09:03:30 -0700 (MST)
From: Jeff Duntemann <jeffd@coriolis.com>
Subject: AN/GRC-109
Hi gang--
Well, I just ordered my own AN/GRC-109 setup, thanks to the descriptions
you all so graciously posted here. (Had to settle for the big power
supply; the little ones are gone.) I have spares for all the tubes and room
in the garage...but what sold me on it was the fact that it has a built-in
straight key! I am definitely a straight key man. My father was in AACS
in Atar, Mauritania during the War manning a weather/beacon radio station
(or perhaps something more; he implied there were things about it he
couldn't talk about) and used a bug. In Boy Scouts he tried to teach me
Morse using a modern bug of uncertain manufacture (black iron base with a
transparent plastic lid; the whole thing reminded me of a fat butter dish
with a paddle) and I got nowhere. But when I fell back to the old black
phenolic military straight key he had I was fine.
Some guys just don't do bugs, I guess. Morse for me is a vertical rhythm.
One other note on the AN/GRC-109. As far as I know there is no copyright
on military manuals (unless they are training materials licensed from other
publishers; McGraw-Hill did some of this long ago) so we could freely
publish the circuit of the transmitter. It sounds simple enough for people
to duplicate, assuming there are no really weird encapsulated assemblies or
impossible-to-duplicate transformers. (Things like that are one reason I
have steered generally clear of military gear for the last 25 years.) I
see lots of used 2E26's at hamfests for a dollar or less, and all of them
(so far) have tested good.
What would be the best way to run this thing off a car battery?
- --73--
- --Jeff Duntemann KG7JF
Scottsdale, Arizona
End of glowbugs V1 #21
**********************
Created by Steve Modena, AB4EL
Comments and suggestions to modena@SunSITE.unc.edu