Subject: Re: Apologia & Explanation: Vices and Vises

From: [email-masked] (Ed Rich)
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1997 01:00:31 GMT

A

>	-- Andrew Barss and Andrew Barss

Excuse me, is that Barss or Bare ass?

---

From: [email-masked] (Phil Rose)
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 1997 16:52:32 -0400

In article
<[email-masked]>, Andrew
Barss <[email-masked]> wrote:

[snip]
> In an attempt to recoup my dignity, I posted a smartass flame to
> the original poster -- who was me -- acusing him (me) of total
> nitwittery.   
> 
> In a reply to that flame, a quite nice person rose to my (the
> original befuddled vise mounter) defense, and took the flamer
> (me) to task for being very rude.  Rest assured, I wouldn't have
> said that to anyone ELSE -- but I reserve the right to be as rude
> as possible to myself, at least in jest. So, to set the record
> straight:  Andrew Barss posted  request for help; Andrew Barss
> insulted himself for all to see; no offense was intended!

[snip]
>         Hope this clears things up.
> 
> 

Andrew,

I was amused to read of your "predicament", but I must warn you that
engaging in any more self-flaming will probably have a serious impact on
your eyesight. 

;^)

-- 
Phil Rose