Sunshine & Mountain Home Power Richard Perez Many of the best rural home sites in America are a mile or more from commercial electrical power. This prime, unspoiled land has only one real liability- no electricity. Technology has provided the tools to solve this problem. And usually at far less cost than commercial electrical service. Here's the story of a family that lives high in the Siskiyou Mountains of southwestern Oregon. They live beyond the commercial power lines. They make their electricity on site using sunshine. And they did it at about 1/3 the cost of running the commercial power lines just 4,000 feet. System Location Roger, Ana and Kirk Murray live on a mountain side some 5 airline miles southeast of the small town of Ashland, Oregon. Of course, airline miles don't mean much in the mountains unless you're a bird. By road, the Murrays are about 18 miles from town. Sixteen of these miles are on serpentine pavement winding up the 6,000 foot bulk of Soda Mountain. At about 4,000 feet altitude, the Murrays leave the blacktop and use a 2 mile stretch of dirt road to reach their homesite. Their home is located on the 4,600 foot level on Soda Mountain's northwest face. This location has enough altitude to receive heavy snow and other bad weather associated with mountain living. Snow depth can reach over 5 feet during the winter. Transportation in the winter varies from rough going in a 4WD to cross county skis. While Roger and Ana's site may be hard to get to, it's definitely worth the trip. The Pacific Crest Trail runs within a mile of their house. The panoramic vastness of the mountains is stunning. INSERT MOUNTAIN PANORAMIC INSERT HOUSE PHOTO Roger & Ana's home is located about 4/5ths of a mile from the nearest commercial electrical line. At the local power company's going rate of $5.35 per foot for new service, this adds up to about $21,000. This is the cost of JUST running in the power line. It doesn't include the cost of the electricity (about 7.5¢ per kWh locally). In addition, because of this site's remote location, the power company also charges a minimum power consumption fee of $50. per month. If Roger & Ana don't use $50 worth of electricity in a month, then the utility bills them for it anyway. Roger and Ana decided to investigate alternatives to commercial power. They contacted their neighbors at Electron Connection and together we specified and installed a self-contained electrical system. The first step in any renewable energy system is a thorough survey of how much and what kind of electricity is needed. And this is where we started with Roger and Ana. Electrical Power Requirements Roger and Ana Murray decided early on to use only very efficient appliances within their system. And they decided to practice the cardinal rule of energy conservation, "Turn it OFF if you aren't using it." As such, their electrical power consumption is much smaller than the average household. Their choices of appliances represents the same compromises every user of renewable energy faces. The majority of the electricity required by Roger and Ana was in the form of 120 vac. The appliances requiring this power are detailed in Figure 1. The largest consumers are lighting, a computer and a washing machine. Some of the appliances condensed into the "Misc" category are a food processor, blender, vacuum cleaner, computer printer, and sewing machine. 120 vac power consumption was estimated to be about 1,270 watt-hours per day. The remainder of the required energy is consumed as 12 VDC directly from the batteries. DC appliances include a 12 Volt refrigerator, lighting, stereo, and TV. These appliances are detailed in Figure 1. We estimate that this system consumes an average of 804 Watt-hours per day directly as low voltage DC from the batteries. Total electrical power consumption specified for this system is 2,704 Watt-hours per day. This is about 1/5th of average for the grid connected American home. Roger and Ana use propane for cooking and water heating. Their 1,300 square foot home is well insulated and equipped with three systems for space heating. First is passive solar from the greenhouse attached to the south side of the house. Second is a wood fire space heater in the house's main room. And third, a propane space heater that's not often needed. System Components These components were selected to provide the most cost effective power for Roger and Ana. A renewable energy system is more personalized than a pair of shoes. One size does not fit all. This set of components is a specific match for their energy requirements, site and lifestyle. A system for different folks in a different location would have different amounts and types of equipment. A renewable energy system's success or failure depends on the amount and quality of the planning done before a single piece of hardware is ever purchased. Consult an individual or company with the experience necessary to see that you get the system you require without spending more than necessary. Power Sources- Photovoltaics (PVs) & Engine The main source of power for Roger and Ana are eight 48 Watt Kyocera PV modules. These modules convert sunlight directly into direct current electricity. Roger and Ana's array of eight PV modules produce 384 peak Watts and about 2,500 Watt-hours per average sunny day. INSERT PV/TRACKER PHOTO The 8 PV modules are mounted on a Zomeworks passive tracker. This tracker increases the average electrical output of the PV array by 25% annually. The Zomeworks trackers use the sun's heat to keep the PV array constantly facing the sun. The tracker swivels on a steel pipe set in a hole in the ground filled with concrete. The tracker has two tubes along its sides that are filled with compressed freon gas. If the tracker is not directly facing the sun, then the tubes are unevenly heated. This causes gas to move from one side of the tracker to the other. This changes the tracker's balance and it rotates to face the sun. This tracker is totally passive and requires no electricity in its operation. The Zomeworks trackers work as if by magic. Roger says one of his favorite pastimes is trying to visually catch the tracker actually moving. As Roger and Ana's site is heavily wooded, we had to go quite a way from the house to find a good solar location for the tracker. If a tracker is to be cost effective, then it MUST have all day access to the sun. We finally settled on a clearing that required only minimal tree cutting to give the tracker all day sun. The tracker's location is about 118 feet (one way or about 240 feet round trip wire length) from the battery compartment. This long run of 12 VDC wiring required "0" gauge copper cable to efficiently transfer the low voltage energy from the PV array to the house. The PV array is kept under control by the Heliotrope CC-60 PWM Taper Charge Controller. This device is inserted in series between the PV array and the battery pack. The function of this controller is to see that the array doesn't overcharge the batteries. The Heliotrope is user programmable and capable of handling up to 60 Amperes of array current. This controller not only protects the batteries, but also assures they are as fully charged as possible. This control works very well and we highly recommend it. See Home Power #8, page 31, for a "Things that Work!" test of the Heliotrope CC Series Charge Controllers. Roger and Ana's system uses an engine/generator for backup power during extended cloudy periods. This generator, which Roger has used for years, is powered via gasoline and produces 4kW of either 120 or 240 vac. The generator can power loads too large for the inverter. It can also recharge the system's batteries via the charger built into the inverter. Roger and Ana's well uses a submersible 240 vac water pump to fill a large cistern which gravity flows the water to the house. The generator supplies 240 vac for the pump. Roger is investigating putting his water supply on solar too, but that's another storyÉ Energy Storage- Batteries Roger and Ana's system uses six Trojan L-16W deep cycle, lead acid batteries for storing the PV produced electricity. The Trojan L-16W is a battery containing three lead-acid cells developing 350 Ampere-hours each. Each L-16W battery contains 350 Ampere-hours at 6 VDC. We combined, via series and parallel wiring, six of these batteries into a pack of 1,050 Ampere-hours at 12 Volts DC. This pack contains enough stored energy to power the system for about 5 sunless days before requiring recharging. For more details on battery sizing, recharging and maintenance see the Battery article in this issue. One interesting feature of this system is the outside battery compartment Roger constructed. This compartment is on the outside of same wall where the inverter and ac mains panel are located inside. This allows for short wiring lengths through the wall. The battery compartment is insulated with foil backed, rigid foam insulation to keep the batteries warmer in the winter. When we were at Roger's site shooting the photos you see here, the battery compartment was a good 15¡ to 20¡F. warmer than the outside sub-freezing temperature. The batteries stay warm because their compartment is thermally locked to the house. INSERT BATTERY COMPARTMENT PHOTOS Energy Conversion - Inverter/Battery Charger Roger and Ana's system employs a Trace 2012 inverter/charger. This marvelous device converts the 12 VDC energy stored in the batteries into 120 vac housepower for appliances. This inverter is capable of producing 2,000 watts (surge to 6,000 watts) of power that will efficiently (>90%) power virtually any standard appliance. This inverter is connected directly to the batteries via short (<6 foot) "0" gauge copper cables with permanent, soldered connectors. The inverter's 120 vac output is connected to the input of the house's ac mains distribution panel. TECHNO NOTE: Consider this when wiring inverters into mains panels. Household ac mains panels are designed to accept 240 vac (actually two 120 vac legs, 180¡ out of phase, in techno lingo) as input. In order to get the inverter's 120 vac output into BOTH sides of the panel, simply wire the two hot sides of the panel in parallel. The Trace inverter contains a battery charger that can stuff up to 110 Amperes into the 12 VDC battery pack. The charger is built into the inverter and accepts 120 vac as input. In charge mode, this converts 120 vac into 12 VDC for battery recharging, exactly the reverse of its function when it is inverting. This charger and its control circuitry are the best now available. This inverter/charger is very smart. Let's follow what happens when the inverter's charger is plugged into an operating 120 vac engine/generator. First of all the charger waits several seconds during which it tests the incoming generator power. If the power is acceptable (i.e. not too low in voltage, etc.), then the inverter stops inverting and automatically begins battery recharging. All loads normally supplied by the inverter are automatically transferred to the generator. The charger is user programmable for charge rate and voltage level during the recharging process. For a "Things that Work!" test of the super Trace 2012 and its battery charger, please see Home Power #8, page 29. Is This A System? You bet it is. Figure 2 below shows how the individual components are grouped together. The power sources, PV and engine, are at the top. The illustration shows 120 vac circuits on the left and 12 VDC circuits on the right. Note the inverter/charger spanning the differences between the two types of electricity. INSERT FIG 2 SYSTEM DIAGRAM IN RSG System Performance Roger and Ana's system is basically solar powered. They produce about 2,500 Watt-hours from the tracked PV array on a sunny day. They store about 5 days worth of energy in their battery pack. The PV array's almost daily production stretches the time between engine/generator battery recharging to over 16 days on the average. Most of the only 300 hours per YEAR of generator operation happens during the winter's cloudy periods. This system will not require starting the generator at all during the summer. Routine maintenance for this sytem will consist of occassionaly greasing the Tracker's bearings, filling the batteries with DISTILLED water, and regular engine/generator oil changes, etc. It is the occasional generator use that produces most of the maintenance and operating cost of this system. It is still, however, very cost effective to rely on the generator for only back up power. The Murray's PV system is sized to provide their average daily electrical requirements. If the same system were sized to suit their worst case requirements instead of their average requirements, then the system would be very different. It would have to contain a battery pack that was twice the size. The additional PVs necessary to refill this larger battery pack, during the short sunny periods between extended cloudy times, would more than double the array's size. In other words, lots hardware JUST to meet the short requirements of deep winter. At 300 operating hours year, their generator should last at least 10 years and the operating cost of <$7. monthly is small. Using the generator to back up the solar is the most cost-effective alternative at this time. This allows the system to be sized for average rather than worst case usage. System Cost The initial investment in this system was $7,380.83. This is broken down as follows: PVs- $2,848.00, Batteries- $1,470.00, Inverter/charger- $1,465.00 Tracker- $801.50, Cable & Wire- $444.43, Installation Labor- $184.50, and PV Charge Controller- $167.50. See Figure 3 for a graphical presentation of where the bucks went. Please note, the inverter's cost includes the optional battery charger and the optional digital metering package. The high cost of the cables and wire is due to the some $300. for "0" cable between the tracked PVs and the house. We estimate that Roger and Ana will run their engine/generator about 300 hours per year. This generator operation is the only regular system operating expense and amounts to about $6.75 per month or $81.02 per year for fuel, oil and generator maintenance. INSERT FIG 3 - COST PIE CHART All cost and operating figures (like $/kWh) for this system are calculated and amortized on a ten year period. The PVs are guaranteed by Kyocera not to lose more than 10% of their output power over a 12 year period (incidently this is the best PV gaurantee in the business). The Trace is warranteed for two years, and field experience has shown this inverter to be ultrareliable. The Heliotrope controller has a limited 10 year warranty. While the batteries are not guaranteed, they will last 10 years with proper cycling and maintenance. A renewable energy system is a long term investment. While the equipment must be purchased, we are really buying more than a pile of hardware. What we are buying is dependable, nonpolluting electrical power for at least the next ten years. This energy is ours and already paid for, just as sure as the sun rises in the morning. Well, it cost Roger and Ana $7,380.83 to buy and install their system. It will cost them an additional $810.20 over the next ten years to operate and maintain their generator. Their total electrical cost, both to buy and operate this system, for the next ten years will be around $8,191. This is $12,800 less than the $21,000. that the power company wanted just to run in the wires. And the Murray's don't get a monthly bill for their electricity. How Do PVs Affect This System's Cost? If the PVs and the tracker aren't used in this system, then it would have to be sourced via the engine/generator. Without the PVs, the generator would have to be operated about 1,250 hours per year at a cost of $66.57 per month or $798.84 per year. This amounts to a ten year cost to buy and run the system of $11,720 without the PVs. With the tracked PV array in this system, its ten year cost is reduced to $8,191. This amounts to a savings, over ten years, of $3,529. by using the photovoltaics instead of a noisy smelly generator. The chart below, Figure 4, illustrates the economic impact of photovoltaics on Roger and Ana's system. The left hand vertical axis of this graph is the system cost (both Initial Cost & 10 Yr. Cost) in dollars and the right hand vertical axis is the dollars per kiloWatt-hour cost of the electricity produced. The horizontal axis at the bottom of the graph indicates the number of tracked PV modules in the system. The vertical column elements on the graph represent the system's initial cost, and it's TOTAL cost to both buy and operate for a ten year period (called "10 Yr. Cost" on the graph). The line element in the graph depicts the cost of the electricity in dollars per kiloWatt-hour. Note that the graph shows that eventhough the PVs are an initial investment, they quickly pay for themselves by reducing the overall electrical cost via reducing the system's operation costs. The slight wobble in the data at 4 panels is due to the cost of the tracker. The rise in cost between 6 and 8 PV panels is due to the fact that Roger decided on two more PV panels than they actually now require. This allows for future electrical expansion (smart idea). INSERT FIGURE 4- $ VS. PVs System Overview The use of renewable energy sources, modern energy storage and conversion devices have allowed Roger and Ana Murray to live in their home free from commercial power. Their system initially cost them about 1/3 of the money the power company wanted just to hook them up to the monthly bill syndrome. But I don't want to imply that only monetary reasoning decided that renewables should source this system. Roger and Ana are very concerned about the environmental consequences of electrical energy production. They live on the edge of the wilderness because that is where they belong. They want to be sure that the wilderness is still there for their son to enjoy. And so do IÉ INSERT TWO PHOTOS OF ROGER, ANA & KIRK ACCESS System Owners & Operators Roger, Ana & Kirk Murray 1984 Soda Mountain Road Ashland, OR 97520 System Specifier, Vendor and Installer Electron Connection Limited POB 442 Medford, OR 97501 tele: 916-475-3179 Photovoltaic Manufacturer Kyocera America Inc. 8611 Balboa Avenue San Diego, CA 92123 tele: 619-576-2647 PV Tracker Manufacturer Zomeworks Corporation POB 25805 Albuquerque, NM 87125 tele: 505-242-5354 PV Controller Manufacturer Heliotrope General Inc. 3733 Kenora Drive Spring Valley, CA 92077 tele: 619-460-3930 Battery Manufacturer Trojan Batteries Inc. 1395 Evans Avenue San Francisco, CA 94124 tele: 415-826-2600 Inverter Manufacturer Trace Engineering 5917 - 195th N.E. Arlington, WA 98223 tele: 206-435-8826