From att-mt!ihlpl.att.com!jfb Fri Apr 30 12:25:49 1993
Path: cbnewsd!att-out!pacbell.com!decwrl!decwrl!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!hubcap!ncrcae!ncrhub2!law7!military
From: jfb@ihlpl.att.com
Newsgroups: sci.military
Subject: Number Sixty-Five in the Series--Grumman XP-65
Keywords: Never built
Message-ID: <C6B1n1.IxK@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM>
Date: 30 Apr 93 16:25:49 GMT
Sender: military@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM (Sci.Military Login)
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories - Naperville, Illinois
Lines: 68
Approved: military@law7.daytonoh.ncr.com


>From jfb@ihlpl.att.com

The Grumman XP-65 was to have been the Army equivalent of the Navy's 
Grumman F7F Tigercat twin-engined carrier-based fighter.  

You may recall the Grumman XP-50, which was the Army version of the 
Navy's XF5F Skyrocket experimental carrier-based twin-engined fighter.  
The Army had ordered a single XP-50 prototype from Grumman as 
insurance against the failure of the Lockheed XP-49 high-altitude 
interceptor.  Test flights revealed that the XP-50 had a good 
performance, but the sole prototype was destroyed on May 14, 1941 
after the pilot was forced to bale out after an inflight 
turbosupercharger explosion.  Work on the XP-50 was abandoned shortly 
thereafter.  

Following the loss of the sole XP-50, Grumman succeeded in interesting 
the Army in a different proposal, named Design 46 by the company.  
Design 46 called for a somewhat larger twin-engined fighter powered by 
a pair of supercharged 1700-hp Wright R-2600 radials.  Work had 
actually began on Design 46 in October of 1939, nearly two years 
before the loss of the XP-50.  This initial work led to the company's 
Design 49, which was an export version proposed in February 1940 and 
to Design 51, a naval fighter adaptation which was submitted on March 
24, 1941.  

The Grumman proposals attracted enough attention that both the Army 
and the Navy decided to pursue the development of similar 
Grumman-designed twin-engined fighters.  They were to be essentially 
the same aircraft, but the Army version was to have turbosupercharged 
engines and the Navy version was to have mechanically- supercharged 
engines.  Both versions were to have been armed with four 0.50-in 
machine guns, but the Army version was to have had an additional pair 
of 37-mm cannon and the Navy version was to have had a additional 
quartet of 20-mm cannon.  In addition, the Army version was to have a 
pressurized cockpit.  

The Army ordered two prototypes of the Grumman-designed twin-engined 
fighter under the designation XP-65 on June 16, 1941.  The Navy 
ordered two prototypes under the designation XF7F-1 two weeks later.  
However, both services eventually concluded that a single design would 
not actually be able to satisfy their individual requirements, and on 
January 16, 1942 the Army decided to back out of the project in order 
to permit Grumman to optimize their design to meet naval requirements.  

The XP-65 was destined to be Grumman's last fighter submission to the 
USAAF.  Thereafter, all of Grumman's fighter designs were submitted to 
the Navy.  

Estimated performance of the XP-65 included a top speed of 427 mph at 
25,000 feet, a service ceiling of 42,000 feet, and a normal range of 
825 miles.  Weights were to be 15,943 pounds empty and 21,425 pounds 
loaded.  

Sources: 

  War Planes of the Second World War, Fighters, Volume 4, William Green, 
  Doubleday, 1964.  

  The American Fighter, Enzo Angelucci and Peter Bowers, Orion, 1987 

  Grumman Aircraft Since 1929, Rene J. Francillon, Naval Institute 
  Press, 1989.  

Joe Baugher		AT&T Bell Laboratories   	
2000 North Naperville Road      Naperville, Illinois 60566-7033	




