1996.02.22 / Mark Wong /  Re: cold fusion theory (simple)
     
Originally-From: mawong@m2.dseg.ti.com (Mark Wong)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion
Subject: Re: cold fusion theory (simple)
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 96 20:47:09 GMT
Organization: Texas Instruments

Richard Schultz writes:
>Cohen-Tannoudji is only one person; that is, the first author of the
>book is Claude Cohen-Tannoudji.  With a hyphenated last name.

>"I don't know why you are wrong, but my data shows you are completely off."
>               --Jed Rothwell, sci.physics.fusion, 21 Jul 1992

Thanks for the bibliographic correction. Memory starts to lapse when you
get old.
Mark A. Wong                       /             \
Texas Instruments                 /      /|\      \
mawong@m2.dseg.ti.com        ---(.)----<(_+_)>----(.)---
cudkeys:
cuddy22 cudenmawong cudfnMark cudlnWong cudmo2 cudqt1 cudszS cudyr1996 
------------------------------
1996.02.22 / Kent Thuresson /  Tokamak
     
Originally-From: Kent Thuresson <kent.thuresson@pop.landskrona.se>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion
Subject: Tokamak
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 01:20:58 +0100

Does anyone know where I can get hold on information about the 
construction of tokamaks or anything else regarding fusion/plasma?

cudkeys:
cuddy22 cudenthuresson cudfnKent cudlnThuresson cudmo2 cudqt1 cudszS cudyr1996 
------------------------------
1996.02.15 / Jack Love /  Re: How to keep ice/water in it's solid state at 40degrees celcius? Help
     
Originally-From: jackl@nwlink.com (Jack Love)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion
Subject: Re: How to keep ice/water in it's solid state at 40degrees celcius? Help
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 20:32:00 GMT
Organization: Northwest Link

On 10 Feb 1996 22:14:33 GMT, david@cgaski.u-net.com (David Gaskill)
wrote:

>In message <Pine.OSF.3.91.960210105039.6322C-100000@alcor.concordia.ca> - Ziad 
>Rahayel <z_rahay@alcor.concordia.ca> writes:
>
>Hello everybody,
>
>I am not sure I am posting to the right group for this! 
>I am looking for a way to keep ice/water in it's solid state at
>temperatures up to 40degrees celcius.  Any means to do this is welcome,
>thermodynamics, chemical...  Whatever. 
>

I think this is a joke question;  "How do you supply ice water to
sinners in hell?"

>
>Supposing we reversed the direction of flow through a Patterson cell.... now
>there's a thought...  
>
> 
>
>(Ziad, sorry, that's a sort of SPF joke. There are some contributors to 
>this Newsgroup who can do several impossible things before breakfast but 
>I don't think maintaining water in a solid state at 40 degrees is one of 
>them.) 
>
>
>David
>

cudkeys:
cuddy15 cudenjackl cudfnJack cudlnLove cudmo2 cudqt1 cudszM cudyr1996 
------------------------------
1996.02.23 /  R /  Re: final explanation of 2nd law of thermodynamics; entropy
     
Originally-From: "R.  Sherwood" <eagle@mail.sky.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.plutonium,sci.physics.electromag
sci.chem,sci.astro,sci.physics.fusion
Subject: Re: final explanation of 2nd law of thermodynamics; entropy
Date: 23 Feb 1996 02:43:07 GMT
Organization: EKSC

It seems this might be saying there is different probabilities depending 
on where you look.  If the probability for events of certain character 
increases in one location then the probabilty for that same event in a 
different location could be lower.  After all we really have no "closed 
systems" and we do not know that the statistic may be uniformly applied. 
(No error of genaeralization)  Only that the statistic is true as 
an AVERAGE value for the system.  A specific local may be subject to a 
local value.

RS

cudkeys:
cuddy23 cudeneagle cudlnR cudmo2 cudqt1 cudszS cudyr1996 
------------------------------
1996.02.22 /  DavesRadio /  Re: Plans to test the Patterson cell
     
Originally-From: davesradio@aol.com (DavesRadio)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion
Subject: Re: Plans to test the Patterson cell
Date: 22 Feb 1996 13:14:12 -0500
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)

Hello!

You asked, "Do you believe a plate with thin layers of nickel and
palladium deposited onto it would be just as effective as the beads?"

I believe there has been testing done on this already and there were many
problems with the plating bubbling and peeling off.  May have been a
manufacturing process problem, but I'm sure you'll be seeing people trying
every conceivable way to get the same or better results with something
other than the CETI beads.  I'll let you know if I hear anything on these
lines.

Dave Copeland


People Happen
cudkeys:
cuddy22 cudendavesradio cudlnDavesRadio cudmo2 cudqt1 cudszS cudyr1996 
------------------------------
1996.02.21 / Kevin Donnelly /  Re: final explanation of 2nd law of thermodynamics; entropy
     
Originally-From: Kevin Donnelly <esmonde@ww.co.nz>
Newsgroups: sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.plutonium,sci.physics.electromag
sci.chem,sci.astro,sci.physics.fusion
Subject: Re: final explanation of 2nd law of thermodynamics; entropy
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 10:51:31 +1200
Organization: Web World

Erik Max Francis wrote:
> 
> Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> 
> >   If the old 2nd Law of Thermodynamics was a correct law. Then the
> > purest of pure slabs of uranium should upon inspection contain no, or
> > none neptunium or plutonium.
> 
> Hey, that's a pretty convincing testament to that you have no idea what you're
> talking about.
> 
> --
> Erik Max Francis, &tSftDotIotE. && max@alcyone.darkside.com || max@alcyone.com
> San Jose, California, U.S.A. && 37 20 07 N 121 53 38 W && the 4th R is respect
> H.3`S,3,P,3$S,#$Q,C`Q,3,P,3$S,#$Q,3`Q,3,P,C$Q,#(Q.#`-"C`- && 1love && folasade
> Omnia quia sunt, lumina sunt. && GIGO Omega Psi && http://www.alcyone.com/max/
> "Out from his breast/his soul went to seek/the doom of the just." -- _Beowulf_
Cooperation can create a more ordered state.
Healing is an example of co-operation.
cudkeys:
cuddy21 cudenesmonde cudfnKevin cudlnDonnelly cudmo2 cudqt1 cudszM cudyr1996 
------------------------------
1996.02.23 / A Plutonium /  Old 2nd Law of Thermodynamics proves Lee and Yang experiment 
     
Originally-From: Archimedes.Plutonium@dartmouth.edu (Archimedes Plutonium)
Newsgroups: sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.plutonium,sci.physics.electromag
sci.chem,sci.astro,sci.physics.fusion
Subject: Old 2nd Law of Thermodynamics proves Lee and Yang experiment 
Date: 23 Feb 1996 02:03:56 GMT
Organization: PLutonium College

In article <4ge8mp$ot7@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
Archimedes.Plutonium@dartmouth.edu (Archimedes Plutonium) writes:

>   In the next few days I should come up with a brand new theory.
> Linking the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics of old with the sham, bogus
> Conservation Laws. It will take me that much time because the only
> known Conservation law that is known to be bogus is the mirror symmetry
> of left and right (Lee and Yang?). Anyway, nature should not have any
> preference for right and left to the laws of physics, at least that is
> what was thought before Lee and Yang came on the scene. And there seems
> to be not real rhyme or reason in a Big Bang Totalitarian universe as
> to a preference of right or left.
> 
>   There is a preference in a Atom Totality Universe, for envision a log
> spiral is open ended and it is either a right or a left. Discuss this
> in a different post.
> 
>   Now then the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics should be able to either agree
> or disagree with left and right parity. As all readers who have
> followed me with the Atom Universe, knows that I believe all the
> Conservation Laws are old grand daddy fuddy duddy fakes. The short and
> simple argument I have against all Conservation Laws is that they --
> all or even one-- straightjacket the universe. To have a universe of
> maximum change possible entails a universe that has no Conservation
> laws. A universe which allows the maximum possibility for change is one
> which has no conservation law. Not even my, what used to be most
> favorite conservation law, the strongest one in terms of esthetic and
> beauty pleasing-- Conservation of Charge. I even hold that Conservation
> of Charge is a fake.
> 
>   Here I must connect the old 2nd Law of Thermodynamics-- the one which
> has a  missing term of growth with Conservation of Parity. I must work
> with parity because it is the only Conservation Law recognized by the
> current physics community as being a fake. What I hope to do in the
> next days is to post a crude "thought experiment" that indicates that
> if the old 2nd Law were true then the Conservation of Parity is true.
> And since we know parity is false, then the old 2nd Law is false. False
> until you add the missing term of growth to entropy. 


  I am close to a major linking of the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics with
the Conservation Laws of physics.

  It means that all of the Conservation Laws are fakes. And that the
old 2nd Law was only a partial law.

  Even the Conservation of Charge was a fake. There is no 0 charged
particle but that every particle has at least a tiny surface charge.
Such as the neutron and even the photon.

  The old 2nd Law is a Dispersal law, that heat flows always from a hot
body to a cold body, a Diffusion Law. But the old law did not account
for life, or radioactive decay of uranium going to neptunium and
plutonium. The old law had the much of the equation but was missing the
most important term. That term of growth.

  If the 2nd Law, either the old or new, are correct implies that in
the Lee and Yang experiment, there would not be a preference for
lefthanded or righthanded.

  The math of the old 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, when brought around
into the Lee and Yang experiment would indicate Conservation Parity. It
is the fact that the old law says Heat ALWAYS flows from hot bodies to
cold. That is not true.
cudkeys:
cuddy23 cudenPlutonium cudfnArchimedes cudlnPlutonium cudmo2 cudqt1 cudszM cudyr1996 
------------------------------
1996.02.23 /  R /  Re: Sorry for the crosspost only wanted EM
     
Originally-From: "R.  Sherwood" <eagle@mail.sky.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.plutonium,sci.physics.electromag
sci.chem,sci.astro,sci.physics.fusion
Subject: Re: Sorry for the crosspost only wanted EM
Date: 23 Feb 1996 02:45:58 GMT
Organization: EKSC

Sorry for crosspost, my error using reader.

RS

cudkeys:
cuddy23 cudeneagle cudlnR cudmo2 cudqt1 cudszS cudyr1996 
------------------------------
1996.02.22 /  DavesRadio /  CETI News
     
Originally-From: davesradio@aol.com (DavesRadio)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion
Subject: CETI News
Date: 22 Feb 1996 13:41:53 -0500
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)

Hello all spf'ers!

I had the pleasure this morning of speaking with Mr. Jim Reding of CETI
for about 10 minutes on the phone.  He was quite personable, and it was
downright respectable of him to take the time he did to call me back.

I'm not sure of how much of what we discussed I can put up publically, but
I can say that there are some interesting prospects that will become
available "by June of this year", including production of cells for
experimentation, and licensing agreements for "garage" experimenters, and
possibly sourcing of beads for researchers & experimenters, so long as an
agreement exists in writing between CETI and the purchaser of the beads
regarding any plans for product development and/or marketing.

Beyond that, time will tell...

My three cells are completed, awaiting beads.  I keep turning the thing on
in it's beadless state (noting that there is no excess heat without the
beads, even though I have a platinum screen anode AND cathode, running
Li2SO4 through it...  If it were just salt crystals forming causing the
"fool's heat", wouldn't I get them under any electrolysis conditions?)

Anyway, I'll post anything else I hear, along with my results once I get
hold of some BEADS!!!    SOMEBODY SEND ME SOME BEADS!!!!!!!!    :=)

Best regards to all, whatever side of the CF fence you may be on. 
Remember that we may have different ideas & hopes, but despite that, we're
all working to the same end, and we will all be affected by the outcome of
the testing and research on this stuff.  I just personally hope it's real,
because I'd sure like to see this planet get off of the fossil fuel habit!

Dave Copeland

davesradio@aol.com


People Happen
cudkeys:
cuddy22 cudendavesradio cudlnDavesRadio cudmo2 cudqt1 cudszM cudyr1996 
------------------------------
1996.02.22 / Mike Baker /  Re: Radiation Detecting Wristwatch
     
Originally-From: baker@nucst11.neep.wisc.edu (Mike Baker)
Newsgroups: sci.energy,sci.environment,sci.engr.biomed,sci.engr.safety,s
i.med.dentistry,sci.med.deseases.cancer,sci.med.immunology,sci.med.occup
tional,sci.med.,,sci.physics.accelerators,sci.physics.fusion,sci.physics
particle,
Subject: Re: Radiation Detecting Wristwatch
Date: 22 Feb 1996 15:07:10 GMT
Organization: Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison; College of Engineering

In article <ant2121481cbEmcX@j3bkjjm.xs4all.nl> "Fam.Borm-Mulder"
<j3bkjjm@xs4all.nl> writes:
>
>In Holland, and to the best of my knowledge in the whole of
>Europe, separate measurements of the hand or finger dose are
>required for the few heavilly exposed workers.
>
>In Holland we mostly use TLD's instead of filmbadges these days,
>for both versions are available as hand- or finger-dosimeters.
>
>So a wristwatch type of dosimeter may have some applications.
>BTW how long does it take to get a readout from film-badge 
>or TLD device ??
>

	A TLD can be read out in a matter of minutes once 
	it has been collected by the health physics folks.

	I contacted these watch people for more information 
	and the biggest problem is that the watch costs
	$2300 to $2500 (US dollars) depending on what model
	you want.  I think there would only be rare instances 
	where this cost is justified.

	You also asked about its accuracy, the spec sheet they sent
	me says 10% at the calibration point but didn't specify
	much else.
	
	The only reason I can think of that these would be turned
	down by a regulatory body would be that they don't 	
	provide an exposure record for long term storage.  Film
	badges and TLD "glow curves" can be used to meet that 
	function.


-- 
===============================================================================
		Michael Baker ... baker@nucst11.neep.wisc.edu
===============================================================================

cudkeys:
cuddy22 cudenbaker cudfnMike cudlnBaker cudmo2 cudqt1 cudszM cudyr1996 
------------------------------
1996.02.23 / Akira Kawasaki /  Re: January issue of IE?
     
Originally-From: aki@ix.netcom.com(Akira Kawasaki )
Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion
Subject: Re: January issue of IE?
Date: 23 Feb 1996 01:27:25 GMT
Organization: Netcom

In <4gint5$ff1@newsbf02.news.aol.com> georgerw@aol.com (GeorgeRW)
writes: 
>
>Does anyone know whatever happened to the Jan. issue of Infinite
Energy?
>Last I heard It was supposed to be out mid-January. 
>
>I at least have never received it? Anyone know what is going on?
>
As I understand it IE is going ahead with a double issue to come out in
March. The staff was overloaded with material to publish.

-AK-
cudkeys:
cuddy23 cudenaki cudfnAkira cudlnKawasaki cudmo2 cudqt1 cudszS cudyr1996 
------------------------------
1996.02.23 / A Plutonium /  spin direction of 231PU when discovered
     
Originally-From: Archimedes.Plutonium@dartmouth.edu (Archimedes Plutonium)
Newsgroups: sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.plutonium,sci.physics.electromag
sci.chem,sci.astro,sci.physics.fusion
Subject: spin direction of 231PU when discovered
Date: 23 Feb 1996 01:50:05 GMT
Organization: PLutonium College

In article <4ge95m$ot7@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
Archimedes.Plutonium@dartmouth.edu (Archimedes Plutonium) writes:

> Lee and Yang
> experiments to have given that outcome. In plain language, if the
> preferred parity was "rightwards" it is because 231PU is rightwards.

Hauke pointed to a Korean Periodic Chart of the Elements

There was an isotope of 231PU entry based on theory

Was the Lee and Yang preference to the right or left of a marker

Correlate that with the 231PU
cudkeys:
cuddy23 cudenPlutonium cudfnArchimedes cudlnPlutonium cudmo2 cudqt1 cudszS cudyr1996 
------------------------------
processed by cud.pl ver. 0.5 Sat Mar  2 04:37:03 EST 1996
------------------------------
