EIR.030893 (Message-ID: <265-PCNews-124beta@ccs.covici.com>) -> LaRouche explains how the British are destabilizing Italy, in conjunction with the Russians and the Yanks, and attempting to deliberately start a war (Request larouche EIR.030893 for the complete "interview") First of all, as we have discussed in previous broadcasts, the crisis in Italy is engineered from the outside by a network which is Anglo-American in character and Freemasonic in flavor, that is, the British Freemasons, together with the Southern Jurisdiction types in our own country, are key in orchestrating this destabilization in Italy. This is being done as a part of the operation which London orchestrated, together with Gorbachov, in launching the Serbians, partly through London, partly through Gorbachov, partly through people like Brent Scowcroft and [Lawrence] Eagleburger, who are close collaborators of these Serbians, to start a war on the Southern Flank of Germany. Because suddenly, at that point, in 1989-1990, Mrs. Thatcher announced that Germany was the major danger; and therefore, Bush and Thatcher blew the greatest opportunity in 20th century history by turning away from the opportunity to develop Eastern Europe and Russia along new lines, through economic cooperation, and instead used Russia, in part--that is, Gorbachov and Marshal [Dmitri] Yazov--to launch the Serbians in this hideous war against other peoples of former Yugoslavia, the Milosevic group. [...] They are simply trying to destroy and discredit all the parties. That is being done through a law which was imposed by the occupying powers, the Anglo-Americans, at the end of World War II, in which, under pressure, Italy passed this law, under which there can be no competent financing of parties without resorting to things which are considered illegal or quasi-illegal; and that is being used just to pull down the system at this point. -> LaRouche continues to explain how the Brits and Yanks have started the Balkan war...(EIR.030893) What has happened, because the United States and Britain, under Bush and Thatcher, unleashed various regional wars, such as the Balkan war, which they sponsored with Gorbachov, is that we have gone back to a new version of the kind of conflict which existed prior to 1989. -> LaRouche explains how the Brits and Russians "Unleashed the Serbian Fascists," and takes a shot at the Israelis at the same time (EIR.030893): Ridley was nothing but the bark of the Margaret Thatcher dog. He was her minister and even though she was a rather nasty person, she as head of government in Britain, could not say openly, diplomatically, the kinds of things she could have some of her ministers say. So she had this scoundrel, Conor Cruise O'Brien and Nicholas Ridley, one of her ministers, spew out this venom, talking about a Fourth Reich. Many people will recall, if they look back at the newspaper files, they will find that it was this Fourth Reich formulation and the negotiations between Thatcher and Gorbachov to unleash the Serbian fascists and the kind of genocide and other war crimes being committed in Yugoslavia today. This was all the same package. You will find certain Israelis who were supporting the Serbian fascists in this genocide, were using the same formulation: ``Fourth Reich,'' ``Fourth Reich.'' -> LaRouche explains how the Brits bombed the World Trade Center (EIR.030893) But certainly, that bombing could not have been done by a bunch of Arabs. This is a highly sophisticated operation. There are a few people, a few teams in the world, that could have done that--relatively few. Most of them are known; this was not simply done by that blind, 80-year-old sheikh. That sheikh is a British intelligence asset. We have his pedigree; he is British intelligence. He was brought into the United States in 1991 by the State Department and protected by the State Department, up until these recent events, up until a few days ago. So the man was a protected State Department asset actually owned by British intelligence out of the old Arab Bureau network. -> and blames the Aussies for Waco while he's at it... Somebody else has done it; it is done against the Clinton administration, just as that dirty operation that was done down in Waco, which was run out of Australia, of all places, in order to set that thing up--out of Australia. And used a convicted a felon as the complainant to get the thing moving. [...] The case in particular starts {in Australia.} A fellow called Isi Leibler in Australia who is an ADL asset, who has recently been disowned by the Mossad, and his circle, have control over certain sections of the Australian government. Through a department of the Australian government, a misinformational report was sent--very alarming and very electrifying--to the U.S. State Department. The U.S. State Department, because it involved weapons, turned the case over to ATF. .. -> LaRouche explains how the Brits put Khomeini in power... We should have to recognize that the trigger point, the detonator point, for this lunacy, was that the United States and Britain put a British asset, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in Iran. -> LaRouche explains how the Brits are destabilizing Clinton and complaining about the administration "not having the right Jews." We have heard Lord Owen, the British ambassador, screaming the most undiplomatic screaming against the United States on the territory of the United States over this policy, not just the Bosnian policy, but over the British policy of creating this one-world order. And [President] Clinton, who may not be the most profound in his thinking, is going on the basis of saying he would like to be re-elected; and he is thinking about being re-elected, at least instinctively, while he is President. And he is trying to respond to this, and that in a way which seems to him to be the response of a guy who wants to be re-elected. So he is doing things--he is backing off like a weathervane, often. But he is doing things; and he represents a destabilization factor from the standpoint of certain Anglo-American [Establishment] and other circles, and they are not particularly happy with him. They have made that very clear, particularly from some of the neo-con[servative] attacks on Clinton for not having the right Jew. He had enough Jews in the administration, but they said he did not have the right Jews, and that kind of stuff. EIR.032493: Message-ID: <270-PCNews-124beta@ccs.covici.com> -> LaRouche reiterates how the Brits and Bush unleashed the Serbs: The problem today, which comes to Clinton's doorstep, is the fact that Thatcher and Bush, principally, as the responsible heads of government and state, respectively, destroyed all of the good work that Reagan did in this connection, by their crazy policy toward attacking Germany by unleashing Serbia against the southern flank of Europe and by imposing insane conditions upon Russia and Eastern European countries which are pushing Russia today into an adversarial emotional posture against the United States and Britain, with Russia still having the world's largest and second-largest naval- and land-based rocket arsenal. -> LaRouche explains how Clinton and the Brits are forcing the Russians into a hostile position...(EIR.032493) As I said before, he can go my way, or it will be totally ineffective. As long as Clinton and the Thatcherites in Britain succeed in continuing to impose the so-called reform reform program of IMF conditionalities upon Russia under the present policy guidelines, which were set into motion under Thatcher and Bush, which are called the Project Democracy guidelines, the situation in Russia will deteriorate and we will very rapidly have the emergence of Russia as a thermonuclear power--which it already is--with a {resolve} and a {hostile emotional projection} against the United States and Britain, particularly, for what the Russians will say and feel that the West has done to them, in the sense of betrayal. -> LaRouche explains how Thatcher and "British interests" murdered a German banker (EIR.032493) What happened is that Thatcher and Bush, as the policy carriers of that period, went in the opposite direction. Deutsche Bank banker Alfred Herrhausen, who proposed a policy similar to mine, was killed, assassinated, by British interests because they did not like what he was offering. They did not like mine, either. -> LaRouche explains that Thatcher is an idiot and an criminal, and that Yeltsin is an "agent of the Anglo-American policies" (EIR.032493) Q: As you are talking, I hear Margaret Thatcher and I hear the gurus of the Heritage Foundation and others saying, ``Isn't it better that we now have the former Soviet Union in a weakened condition, and wouldn't the policies that you're proposing, strengthen the former Soviet Union, an adversary, and create more difficulties for the United States?'' MR. LAROUCHE: Beginning 1983, I warned these idiots--and I use the term idiots because the criminality of what they have done is beyond belief when we consider the dangerous world we live in today--I warned them that if they went with that kind of policy toward Russia, that what they would do, is they would see the fall of communism. That is exactly what the Yeltsin crisis is. The Yeltsin crisis is not caused by something inside Russia. The Yeltsin crisis is caused by the fact that Mr. Yeltsin has been seen, by the Russians, {as the agent of the Anglo-American policies which the Russian people and leading institutions have grown to hate.} -> LaRouche explains how the Brits have been plotting agains the Germans, and caused the Balkan Wars, and explains how the Serbs are really agents of the British... From 1880 on, the British became very excited about what they saw as the threat that German economic development, which was vastly surpassing anything in Britain, would again ``infect'' Russia with industrial and agricultural development. So in order to prevent that, they developed the doctrine of geopolitics. What they used was pan-Slavism and French revenge-ism[sic] after the defeat of France in the Franco-Prussian War, as motivations for building an alliance against Germany while also carving up the Ottoman Empire and the Austro-Hungarian Empire. This was triggered, by British agents and their friends in Venice and in Salonika, as the Balkan Wars of the nineteenth century and the Balkan Wars of the twentieth century. So you had Russians drawn into the Balkans by an affinity with Serbians, which is called pan-Slavism. So the Russians were taking the side of the Serbs against the Austro-Hungarian Empire and the Ottomans. Then you had the French, who were also in deep through the Freemasonic connections with the Serbian terrorists of that period, the Black Hand Society and so forth; and all this all became a division of Europe against itself, which Britain saw as preventing Europe from engaging in the kind of economic development, which would make Eurasia a successful competitor to the worldwide power of the British Empire. When Germany was reunified, we heard from Margaret Thatcher's circle, from Conor Cruise O'Brien and from the now recently deceased Nicholas Ridley, the cry of ``Fourth Reich,'' the argument that Germany was now going back to take over all of Europe, and therefore Britain had to get the Russians and the Balkans, the Serbs in particular, to go at Germany. They got Bush into support of this policy; and so Milosevic, who is essentially a British Intelligence asset, and some Serbs who were also Russian assets, were co-deployed by an agreement between the Thatcher government and Gorbachov to launch this war in the Balkans--in the same way that British Intelligence had launched the Balkan Wars preceding World War I to ignite World War I. EIR.033093 (Message-ID: <282-PCNews-124beta@ccs.covici.com>) -> LaRouche explains how the British are responsible for nearly everything (EIR.033093) The problem is this. Because of the mess which Mrs. Thatcher and George Bush led in making of the great opportunity which opened up at the end of 1989, with the crumbling of the so-called Iron Curtain, we have a situation in which governments around the world have deteriorated to the point that no one really is on top of the situation. They have the power to command, but they do not have the power to address any problems. This is the case in Britain, which is essentially a disgusting mess from the standpoint of government. Germany: Chancellor Kohl is trying to hold on to his seat, but there is not much else going on around him. Italy: the government is crumbling because of an Anglo-American, essentially British but Anglo-American, destabilization of the whole political system of Italy, through covert operations. A similar process is being launched in Germany now, though not as intensively or extensively as in Italy. -> LaRouche explains how stupid Americans are, how they have been brainwashed into thinking incorrect thoughts...and how the Brits and Yanks put Hitler into power...how the Brits started WWI... For the American citizen to understand this issue, we have to look into some of the brainwashing, and I think that term has to be used, of the majority of American citizens themselves. For example, most American citizens still believe that Germany caused World War I and World War II. Of course, in the case of World War II, Hitler was a terrible problem and did take the actions which actually led to the general warfare. But the causes of World War II go back to about 1932-33, when a group around Averell Harriman and company in the United States, and similar people in Britain allied to Harriman, actually put Hitler into power, to overthrow the von Schleicher government. Had they not overthrown the von Schleicher government, there would have been no World War II in that form; there would have been no Hitler. So in that sense, the fact is, that the United States and Britain caused World Wars I and II. Britain is primarily responsible for World War I, and was a co-author, and probably the initiating co-author, of the design for what became World War II. {This is directly contrary to all typical American belief.} They are taught in school, they are taught by the news media, etc., etc., etc.; and when you tell a typical American and show him even the facts which show that George Bush's father, Prescott Bush, as the general manager, chief executive officer, for Averell Harriman, {moved the money into the Nazi Party to put Hitler into power,} he'll say, ``No, that can't be true. I couldn't believe that.'' But it's true. -> LaRouche explains how the Brits are destabilizing _everyone_ The same thing that happened then, is happening now. {Before} the unification of Germany occurred, you had Mrs. Thatcher, with her Conor Cruise O'Brien and her minister, now recently deceased, Nicholas Ridley, insisting that the great danger to world peace was the reunification of Germany; and the term used was Fourth Reich. That was a signal for both U.S. intelligence services and British intelligence services to do a number of things to destabilize all of Europe, which they did. And at the same time, the British and some of the Americans worked with Gorbachov; and Gorbachov, partly through Minister [Dmitri] Yazov, the defense minister, set loose certain U.S. and British assets in former Yugoslavia--that is, the fascist faction of Milosevic in Serbia. They launched the war on what is called strategically the southern flank of Central Europe. The purpose of this war and these other measures was to weaken the governments and economies of western Europe, while weakening the economies, and actually ruining the economies, of the former communist states of eastern Europe, including Poland, which they have done. Poland is down to about 30 percent of the level of economy it was at the time that it came out from under Soviet domination; and to collapse also of the former Soviet Union. This has produced this dangerous war-threatening situation, and that is where we stand: that is where the problem lies. One has to understand that; and somebody is going to have to take the American people by the ears and say, ``cut out this nonsense, take your fairy tales about German war guilt, throw them away; yes, the Germans under the Kaiser were a bunch of fools, and fell into the trap; Hitler was an American creation, who did provoke the war, who did horrible things, no question about it. But let's look at how these things are set up, and not just look at what happens once they are set up.'' -> LaRouche once again expounds on British guilt regarding Serbia... The point is, we cannot tolerate this mess. There are war crimes. Genocide is going on in the Balkans. Eagleburger and Scowcroft and the other Bush leaguers, the Kissinger-Bush league types, together with Carrington's crowd and Lord Owen's crowd, and Britain, are responsible for this mess. We have to recognize that the Europeans and the Americans committed a great crime in tolerating this situation for as long as we have. We are going to have to take various kinds of measures.