------------------------ BurmaNet ------------------------ "Appropriate Information Technologies, Practical Strategies" ---------------------------------------------------------- The BurmaNet News: AUGUST 7, 1995 THE NATION: FOREIGN MINISTRY DESERVES CREDIT FOR BRAVING SLORC IRE THE NATION: CONVENOR TO SEE SUU KYI BKK POST: KAREN REFUSING RESETTLEMENT FACE ARREST ---------------------------------------------------------- Produced with the support of the Burma Information Group (B.I.G). The BurmaNet News is an electronic newspaper covering Burma. Articles from newspapers, magazines, newsletters, the wire services and the Internet as well as original material are published. The BurmaNet News is e-mailed directly to subscribers and is also distributed via the soc.culture.burma and seasia-l mailing lists and is also available via the reg.burma conference on the APC networks. For a free subscription to the BurmaNet News, send an e-mail message to: majordomo@igc.apc.org In the body of the message, type "subscribe burmanet-l" (without quotation marks) Letters to the editor, comments or contributions of articles should be sent to the editor at: strider@igc.apc.org ------------------------------------------------------------- INFORMATION ABOUT BURMA VIA THE WEB AND GOPHER: Information about Burma is available via the WorldWideWeb at: FreeBurmaWWW http://199.172.178.200/freebrma/freebrma.htm. [including back issues of the BurmaNet News as .txt files] BurmaWeb: http://www.uio.no/tormodl Burma fonts: http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~lka/burmese-fonts/moe.html Ethnologue Database(Myanmar): http://www-ala.doc.ic.ac.uk/~rap/Ethnologue/eth.cgi/Myanmar TO ACCESS INFORMATION ABOUT BURMA VIA GOPHER: gopher csf.colorado.edu. Look under the International Political Economy section, then select Geographic_Archive, then Asia, then Burma. ---------------------------------------------------------- BURMANET SUBJECT-MATTER RESOURCE LIST BurmaNet regularly receives enquiries on a number of different topics related to Burma. The scope of the subjects involved is simplytoo broad for any one person to cover. BurmaNet is therefore organizing a number of volunteer coordinators to field questions on various subjects. If you have questions on any of the following subjects, please direct email to the following coordinators, who will either answer your question or try to put you in contact with someone who can: Arakan/Rohingya/Burma- [volunteer needed] Bangladesh border Art/archaeology/: [volunteer needed] Campus activism: Boycott campaigns: Buddhism: Buddhist Relief Mission, c/o NBH03114@niftyserve.or.jp Fonts: tom@CS.COLGATE.EDU History of Burma: zar1963@violet.berkeley.edu Chin history/culture: Kachin history/culture: 74750.1267@compuserve.com Karen history/culture: 102113.2571@Compuserve.com Karen Historical Society Mon history/culture: [volunteer needed] Naga history/culture: [volunteer needed] [Burma-India border] Pali literature: "Palmleaf" c/o burmanet@igc.apc.org Shan history/culture: [volunteer needed] Tourism campaigns: bagp@gn.apc.org "Attn. S. Sutcliffe" World Wide Web: FreeBurma@POBox.com Volunteering: Dr. Christina Fink c/o burmanet@igc.apc.org [Feel free to suggest more areas of coverage] ---------------------------------------------------------- ===== item ===== KAREN REFUSING RESETTLEMENT FACE ARREST 7 August 1995, Bangkok Post THAI authorities will next month begin arresting more than 10,000 Karen refugees who have refused to move to two camps arranged for them by the Thai government in Tha Song Yang District. A series of attacks on Karen refugee camps along the Thai Burmese border by the DKBA earlier this year prompted the Thai authorities to set up Mae Hla and Sho Klo camps in Tha Song Yang District, to ensure security as well as for better control of refugees. So far 20,173 Karen refugees have moved to Mae Hla camp and 8,8979 in Sho Klo camps. About 1000 refugees living at Mae Woei, Mae Pho Hta and Kaw Theelu camps and nearby mountainous areas have refused to be resettled at the two "safe camps". The KRC and Thai authorities yesterday met at Sho Klo camp and agreed that the refugees who refused to move into the two camps will be arrested, starting from next month. At the same time, NGOs have declared they will not provide any assistance to the refugees outside the two camps. Those arrested will be given two choice - to go into the camps or to be sent back to Burma. If they did not select either option, they will face legal action for illegal entry which mean both a jail term and a fine. KRC vice-chairman Valles said the KRC will today again warn the refugees outside Mae Hla and Sho Klo camps to make a decision. Those who want to enter the camps will be provided with transportation, he said. Mr Valles said some of these refugees want to return home because they fear being attacked again by the DKBA if they remain in Thailand. (BP) CONVENOR TO SEE SUU KYI 7 August 1995, The Nation THE convenor of a NGO forum on women to be held in Beijing said yesterday she would go to Burma to discuss how newly-released democracy leader Suu Kyi might contribute to the meeting. Supatra Masdit, convenor of the NGO Forum on Women, said Suu Kyi had declined an invitation to attend the meeting but said they would meet in Rangoon tomorrow to discuss how Suu Kyi might send an address to the gathering. (TN) FOREIGN MINISTRY DESERVES CREDIT FOR BRAVING SLORC IRE 7 August 1995, The Nation RATHER than ending the debate with the widely-reviled junta in Burma, the surprise July 10 release of opposition leader Suu Kyi has only intensified it. >From Asean which advocates reform by a kind of osmosis, to Washington where US congressmen want to impose stringent economic sanctions, Suu Kyi's release was taken as vindication for a wide number of approaches being pursued to reform the Rangoon government. Further, it provide the impetus for the leading international players in Burma to intensify their divergent and often conflicting effort to bring prosperity and democracy to the military-controlled state. Australia and European Union said they would re-evaluate their goals push ahead with their "critical dialogue" with Rangoon; Tokyo dropped broad hints that the release was a victory for its "quite diplomacy" and talked of more aid and investment guarantees. Asean hailed Suu Kyi's release as proof of the efficacy of "constructive engagement" and warmly embraced Foreign Minister Ohn Gyaw at last week's annual meeting in Brunei. Burma was allowed to accede to the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation, a primary step for membership, and Asean elders painted grand visions of a prosperous 10-state Asean that included the international pariah. Back in Washington, congressmen were drawing up new deadlines for more punitive action to take against Burma unless Rangoon releases political prisoners and implements democratic reforms. About the only country that had nothing to say was China, which is obviously quite content with the current leading role it has in Burma's affairs. Rangoon's intentions What the generals in Rangoon themselves are planning to do remains something of a mystery. They have yet to give any indication that they are preparing to follow up Suu Kyi's release with meaningful political changes or lighten their heavy-handedrule. Instead, they are showing more of the same contempt for reconciliation that has marked there seven-year regime. Suu Kyi and her family again being maligned in the state-controlled press and her appeals for dialogue ignored. Ohn Gyaw reiterated in Brunei that a new constitution from the ruling Slorc would exclude Suu Kyi for the fatuous reason that she is married to a foreigner. Encouraging stands Against this dim background it is encouraging to see the Thai Foreign Ministry taking a more aggressive and demanding position in relation to its ties with Burma. The visit last week by Thai ambassador to Burma Posak to Suu Kyi was the first by an envoy from an Asean country and risked raising the ire of the Slorc. But it was important for two reasons. Firstly, it served as a reminder to Slorc, and to Thailand's Asean partners, that constructive engagement is a give and take situation. The diplomatic recognition Slorc so desperately wants and which it has been awarded by Asean is not being granted without conditions - namely that it work toward a more open, democratic society. Secondly, it was a prudent move on the part of Thailand to open up a high-level contact with Suu Kyi who is destined to play a major role in Burma's future despite the efforts of the Slorc. In an interview with Thai television last week, Suu Kyi was highly skeptical of Asean's constructive engagement approach, implying that so far the only people to benefit had been businessmen and the government. She also noted that her release means nothing if it does not lead to an easing of the repression and terror that are part of life in Burma and the eventual return of democracy. The first law of international relationships id the establishment of mutual respect. But respect has been sorely missing from the Thai-Burmese relations and much of the blame must rest with Thailand. Since the Slorc came to power in 1988 after killing thousands of pro-democracy protestors, Thailand has displayed an embarrassing eagerness to exploit Burma commercially ana a lamentable lack of interest in seeing the country develop democratically. Within months of the Rangoon massacres, then army-chief Gen Chavalit led the first the first official foreign delegation to ]Burma to sign up logging and fishing deals. On his return, hundreds of student dissidents were forcibly repatriated to Burma. Seven years later, Chavalit id talking of going back to Rangoon in a bid to improve the current strained relations between the two countries. But Chavalit's clubby, officer-to officer, business-first type of diplomacy is outdated and will do little to improve long-term relations. Real hope lies with the Foreign Ministry, which is taking moves to wrest control for foreign policy away from the military and intelligence services, a move which will hopefully lead to the forging of a sustainable relationship built on the principle of mutual respect for the people's of each country. It may not happen soon, but it is the only hope for he future. (TN)