----------------------------------BurmaNet---------------------------- "Appropriate Information Technologies, Practical Strategies" --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The BurmaNet News: October 29, 1996 Issue #553 Noted in Passing: It is impossible to avoid the conclusion that the use of forced labour represents the central feature of the regime's infrastructure development policy - Aust. Foreign Minister: Mr. Alexander Downer (see: AFR: AUST GOV'T PRESSED TO TAKE HARD LINE ON BURMA.) HEADLINES: ========== REUTERS: BURMA RELEASES SUU KYI AIDE, REMOVES BLOCKADES. REUTERS: EU IMPOSES RESTRICTIONS ON BURMESE LEADERS STATEMENT: SLORC TO APPEAR BEFORE CRC JAN 97 TIME MAGAZINE: TIGHTENING THE SCREWS ON BURMA STATEMENT: NY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BURMA BKK POST: MASSIVE EXODUS FOR REFUGE ON THAI SOIL EXPECTED AFR: AUST GOV'T PRESSED TO TAKE HARD LINE ON BURMA. TT: BONN HALTS SHORTWAVE TRANSMITTER FOR BURMA CHRO: APPEAL TO U.N AND INTERNATIONAL AGENCIES --------------------------------------------------------------------------- REUTERS: BURMA RELEASES SUU KYI AIDE, REMOVES BLOCKADES. October 28, 1996 RANGOON, Oct 28 (Reuter) - Burma's military government on Monday released a top National League for Democracy (NLD) official detained last week for questioning over a recent student protest, a family member and NLD sources said. Kyi Maung, deputy chairman of the NLD and a close advisor to Nobel Peace laureate Aung San Suu Kyi, was picked up by the State Law and Order Restoration Council (SLORC) on October 23 for questioning over his alleged role in the student protest. "He was returned home at 12.45 p.m. today," a family member said by telephone. Official confirmation of his release was not immediately available. Separately, the government on Monday removed blockades barring access to the road leading to Suu Kyi's house, witnesses said. They said the blockades, which were put up last Tuesday, were removed at around 0700 GMT. Kyi Maung's detention and a fresh crackdown on Suu Kyi's NLD by the SLORC sparked widespread condemnation from Western nations and human rights organisations. The European Union was expected on Monday to increase pressure on the SLORC by imposing tight visa restrictions. A government official said last week that Kyi Maung was being held for questioning in a guesthouse to find out if he had advised two students involved in a protest against the SLORC on October 23. Kyi Maung was seen talking to two student leaders the day before up to 1,000 university students staged the sit-in demonstration about two km (1.2 miles) from Suu Kyi's residence, the official said. The SLORC accused the NLD, especially Kyi Maung, of colluding with the students in the protest to foment unrest. Students involved in last week's demonstration said it was apolitical, and held to protest the authorities' rough handling of three students who were briefly arrested following a quarrel at a restaurant. A similar scuffle in a tea-shop in 1988 sparked nationwide outrage against the former military regime, leading to pro-democracy street demonstrations that left thousands dead or in jail. The SLORC had blocked vehicle and pedestrian access to University Avenue, the road on which Suu Kyi's house is located, for most of the past month in an effort to stop various meetings of the NLD from taking place. Last week the checkpoints, manned by heavily-armed security police, were set up to prevent Suu Kyi from holding an NLD meeting at her house, a government official said. The barricades have also stopped Suu Kyi from giving her regular weekend speeches to supporters at her front gates for the past five weekends. However, NLD sources said on Sunday that Suu Kyi had left her residence recently and had been able to hold meetings with senior members of her party at her home. ***************************************************************** REUTERS: EU IMPOSES RESTRICTIONS ON BURMESE LEADERS October 28, 1996 LUXEMBOURG, Oct 28 (Reuter) - The European Union on Monday imposed strict limits on contacts with Burmese officials in response to what the 15-nation bloc sees as a failure to bring in democracy and end human-rights abuses. Diplomats said that EU foreign ministers agreed the new restrictions without discussion as they began a meeting in Luxembourg. The ministers agreed to refuse entry visas to senior members of Burma's military government and their families, and to senior members of its armed forces and security services viewed by the EU as impeding the country's transition to democracy. They also suspended all high-level EU visits to Burma. In a statement, the ministers said the military government had failed "to demonstrate any willingness to respond to the concerns of the United Nations General Assembly and the European Union". "Further measures may need to be considered," the ministers warned. ***************************************************************** STATEMENT: SLORC TO APPEAR BEFORE CRC JAN 97 October 28, 1996 From: darnott@gn.apc.org SLORC TO APPEAR BEFORE THE UN ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD The Government of Myanmar will appear before the Committee on the Rights of the Child on 15 January (10am-1pm, 3pm-6pm) and 16 January (10am-1pm) 1997. The meetings will be in Geneva at the Palais des Nations. The meetings are public, and the press is likely to take an interest. The government delegation will answer questions from the Committee about Myanmar's implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, which it signed in 1991. It is the only human rights treaty SLORC has itself acceded to. This is the first time SLORC has appeared before the Committee. The questions will be based on the Government of Myanmar's report to the Committee (CRC/C8/Add.9 of 18 September 1995), the pre-sessional consultations of last June when a number of non-governmental organisations and Burma experts briefed the Committee, other documentation received by the Committee, and discussions with SLORC representatives. Though the Committee's intention is to act in a consultative role, sitting down with governments to advise them on the implementation of the Convention, SLORC is likely to get a rather rough ride in January. This is because the Convention is a fairly thorough human rights instrument, and the situation of human rights in Burma, if we are to believe UN, governmental and non-governmental observers and Burmese refugees, is among the worst in the world. David Arnott, Burma Peace Foundation ***************************************************************** TIME MAGAZINE: TIGHTENING THE SCREWS ON BURMA October 28, 1996 Christopher Ogden The US debates how to boost pressure on the junta and its Asian allies THERE is little question that the repressive military junta running Myanmar, or Burma as it was formerly known, comprises as unsavory a bunch of thugs as is likely to be found east of Baghdad. Nor is there much doubt that Aung San Suu Kyi, leader of the National League for Democracy Party, is the most appealing opposition leader and former political prisoner north of south Africa's Nelson Mandela, her fellow Nobel Peace Prize laureate. The effort to promote political freedom in Burma has long produced cheap heated rhetoric in the US, but little real ferment until recently, for two reasons: first, though Burma poses a major human-rights challenge and supplies most of the opium and heroin consumed in the US, the renegade country has had a low priority on Washington's wobbly Asia policy plate; and second, little action was likely while Burma's neighbours were unwilling to risk their business links to Rangoon and were raining disdain on America for posturing. The neighbours wanted "constructive engagement," the failed policy the Reagan Administration tried on South Africa in the 80s in a frantic effort to avoid imposing sanctions on the apartheid government. But lately there has been a mood shift in both the US and in Asean, the seven-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations, which Burma, desperate for investment, wants to join by July 1997. The change was prompted by the latest crackdown by the Slorc - the perfect acronym for an evil cabal overdue for a visit from James Bond. In late September, Slorc arrested more than 500 pro-democracy activists, cut Suu Kyi's phone lines and erected barricades to prevent followers from rallying near her home where she spoke to crowds on weekends. The US Congress responded by considering instant economic sanctions, then settled for a milder bill that would bar new American investment if Burma "has physically harmed, rearrested for political acts or exiled (Suu Kyi) or committed large-scale repression of or violence against the democratic opposition." Pleased with the added flexibility Congress gave him, President Clinton signed the legislation Sept 30, barred Burmese officials on Oct 3 from entering the US and pressed on with his re-election campaign while White House national security aides awaited Rangoon's response. Slorc did what every bully does when facing resistance: it backed down. State Department sources said the junta released 376 of the 573 Suu Kyi backers it admitted detaining but held at least 197, including 34 NLD members who had been elected to parliament. Congressional sources said all but two were released. What matters, of course is that none should have been detained in the first place. Asean, which hoped granting Burma observer status last July would soften its stance, was divided by Slorc's latest crackdown. At the UN last month, foreign minister of Asean members failed to reach agreement on allowing Burma's full admission next year. Malaysia backed Rangoon, but Thailand and the Philippines uncharacteristically went public with reservations Indonesia is waiting for its allies to reach a consensus. Beyond Asean, Japan openly criticized Slorc. In Brussels, European Union ministers considered a package of penalties, including suspending trade benefits, because Burma uses a great deal of forced labour, compelling as many as 2 million citizens to build roads, bridges and hotels. The Clinton Administration is also torn over what to do next some US Senators have urged applying sanctions immediately, convinced Burma is already guilty of "large-scale repression. Congress is in recess for the Nov 5 election, though, so Clinton has leeway. Some of his aides say sanctions should not be imposed until the very last moment so the threat of using them will remain a deterrent. Others insist the US will lose credibility if it fails to follow through quickly. What is involved? Primarily petroleum interests. The US is Burma's fourth largest investor - after France, Singapore and Thailand - thanks largely to Unocal's 28% stake in a billion-dollar gas field and pipeline project led by France's Total. There is, however, a clear way to go forward right now when, according to Mike Jendrzejczyk, Washington director of Human Right Watch/Asia, "the United States has maximum and unique leverage." The US cannot operate unilaterally, so it must use the cracks that have opened in Asia. The Administration should tell the Asean governments and Japan that if Burma has not substantially eased repression by the end of November, the US will proceed with sanctions. Asean cannot cave in to Washington, so its acceptable fallback should be to demand that Slorc begin talking with Alvaro de Soto, the UN envoy charged last year with facilitating a dialogue on Burma. That would set the stage for the full-down UN debate on Burma scheduled for late November. In the meantime, Clinton must talk up Burma at the Nov 24 Asia-Pacific Economic Conference summit in Manila. Secretary of State Warren Christopher can push further at the Asean ministerial session the following week in Jakarta. The fulcrums are in place. What remains is the forceful application of leverage in unison. ***************************************************************** STATEMENT: NY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BURMA October 24, 1996 From: "Burma UN Service Office" New York Declaration of the International Conference on Burma New York Helmsley Hotel We, the representatives of the people of Burma elected in the 27 May 1990 general elections, together with members of the democratic movement of Burma, having met at the New York International Conference, hereby: Reaffirm the popular will of the people of Burma to restore democracy and the need of a national mandate for any government to govern; Acknowledge the determination of National League for Democracy (NLD) to steer an unwavering path towards the restoration of democracy in Burma, and especially commend the courage and leadership of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi in taking initiatives for a peaceful democratic transition in spite of increasing restrictions imposed on her and other members of the NLD; Recognize the contribution of members of the NLD, monks, students and individuals inside Burma and all the sacrifices made by countless numbers of people in their unflagging struggle for democracy in spite of being confronted by all manners of repression; Welcome the decision of the NLD Congress to adopt democratic principles as a firm framework for the writing of a new constitution, the formulation of an economic blueprint for Burma, and the formulation of the future role of the Tatmadaw in our national life; Fully agree with the NLD and Daw Aung San Suu Kyi that only a genuine political dialogue between the leaders of the Tatmadaw, the leaders of the democratic movement, and the leaders of the ethnic minorities, can serve to break the national deadlock and put an end to the continuing deterioration of Burma's national status and integrity; Applaud the recent decision of the United States Government to restrict visas for SLORC officials and people whose actions impede the democratic process in Burma, and increase support for the Burmese democracy movement; Applaud the decision of the Danish Government to further promote the cause of democracy in Burma by supporting the National Coalition Government of the Union of Burma and its allies; Applaud the decision by the Norwegian Government to increase support for the Burmese democracy movement; Commend the decision of the European Commission to investigate the practice of forced labour in Burma; Are encouraged by the decision of the International Labor Organization in June to establish a Commission of Inquiry on Burma; Share the concerns expressed in the resolution made at the United Nations Commission on Human Rights in April this year; Note with appreciation all individuals and organizations working tirelessly and consistently for the democratic cause in Burma; Note with great concern: * the recent crackdown against students in Rangoon who organized demonstrations against the police brutality and injustices on October 21 and 22; * the massive arrest of over a thousand NLD members, who tried to attend the NLD Party Congress in September and May. * the deaths-in-custody of NLD elected people's representative U Hla Than and Danish honorary consul Mr. James Nichols; * the continuing detention of U Win Tin, central executive committee member and other members of the NLD, student activists including Min Ko Naing, the leader of ABSFU, and many other individuals arrested for their involvement in the democratic movement; * the continued use of repressive laws and decrees to restrict and deny the people of Burma their fundamental rights; * the rising number of gross human rights violations such as arbitarary killings, mass arrests, forced labor, forced relocation and torture across the country especially in areas with ethnic populations; * the escalating tension in ethnic areas and the use of force to impose cease-fire conditions on the ethnic groups; * the alarming rate of inflation and macroeconomic instability causing severe distress on the daily survival of the majority of the population; * the decaying social bonds within the society as evident by rampant corruption, family breakdown, growing prostitution and crimes. Noting the above concerns, we call on the people of Burma to unitedly strive for a WAY out of our NATIONAL CRISIS; to restore to Burma, our national integrity and a dignified role in the family of nations. Stressing the need for enhanced cooperation between all people of Burma to bring a peaceful change in our country, we hereby: 1. Call for an immediate convening of a consultative dialogue between SLORC leaders and Daw Aung San Suu Kyi to resolve tensions and to discuss further procedures on political dialogue; 2. Call on the SLORC to stop using force in managing civic protests and in seeking peace with ethnic groups; 3. Call on the leaders of the Tatmadaw to facilitate the process of national reconstruction which can restore democratic institutions, free market mechanisms, a civil society and a modern armed forces. 4. Call on the members of the Burmese communities around the world to strengthen their engagement at the grassroot level; 5. Call on the United Nations to send a special envoy to mediate the implementation of the resolution set forth in the last United Nations General Assembly, in particular, to facilitate national reconciliation and democratization; 6. Call on the United States Government and the international community to take additional measures to send an unmistaken signal to the military leaders in Burma that they cannot continue carrying out acts of repression with impunity; 7. Call on the ASEAN to defer the entry of Burma into the association; 8. Call on the members of the international business community to refrain from investing in projects that are beneficial to the SLORC and in projects that are detrimental to the benefits of ordinary people with serious economic, social and ecological damage impact on Burma's future; and 9. Call on the NGOs, human rights groups, activists and individuals engaged in the issues of Burma to sustain their efforts in promoting the cause of democracy in Burma. ***************************************************************** BKK POST: MASSIVE EXODUS FOR REFUGE ON THAI SOIL EXPECTED October 26, 1996 Tak A bout 15,000 refugees are expected to flee across the border to seek temporary refuge on Thai soil during the upcoming annual dry season offensive by Burmese forces against Karen rebels, a meeting heard yesterday. Non-government organisations taking part in the meeting in Mae sot District said Burmese troops are expected to launch a dry-season offensive against Karen National- Union (KNU) forces as a result of failed ceasefire talks between the two sides. Both have reinforced their troops along the border opposite Umphang District. Border Patrol Police said fighting has intensified since October 19 as Burmese troops have been trying to capture the KNU's base opposite Ban Tapheupoo in Umphang District. Two Burmese soldiers were seriously wounded in the attack. The KNU reportedly contacted the State Law and Order Restoration Council (Slorc) to negotiate a ceasefire, but there has been no response. Last week, Rangoon sent three helicopters to patrol the Thai-Burmese border. They landed at its Htee Sa Lee camp, said the BPP source. Col Suvit Manmuen, commander of the Fourth Infantry Regiment's special task force, said there have been indications that Rangoon may renew its attack on the KNU during the dry season. Col Suvit chaired the meeting which was attended by some 50 officials and representatives of the Karen Refugee Committee (KRC), Burma Border Consortium (BBC), Medicine San Frontier (MSF), and the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, All participants were asked to take precautionary measures in case of fighting and to provide help for some 15,000 Karen civilians expected to flee the attack and seek refuge on Thai soil. The KRC also proposed that 3,000 Karen refugees from the Don Pa Kiang camp in Mae Ramat District be relocated to other sites. ***************************************************************** AFR: AUST GOV'T PRESSED TO TAKE HARD LINE ON BURMA. October 25, 1996 (Australian Financial Review) By Michael Dwyer. The Federal Government is facing strong pressure from the corporate sector to toughen its stance against Burma's military dictatorship. The ACTU yesterday released a list of 17 prominent Australian companies which have decided not to do business in Burma. The companies which have placed Burma on their blacklist include BHP, Telstra, Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd, Transfield International Pty Ltd, Placer Pacific and Ashton Mining. The announcement that 17 Australian companies have refused to do business with Rangoon comes amidst growing international concerns about a crackdown on pro-democracy leaders by Burma's ruling State Law and Order Restoration Council (SLORC). The vice-chairman of Burma's National League for Democracy (NLD), U Kyi Maung, was arrested by SLORC troops early on Wednesday morning. U Kyi Maung is a key adviser to NLD leader and Nobel Peace Prize winner Ms Aung San Suu Kyi. The United States has protested against the arrest of U Kyi Maung, with State Department officials describing it as an "escalation" of SLORC repression. Washington has stepped up its campaign against the regime in Burma, placing a ban on travel to the US by SLORC leaders. A number of large multinational companies - Levi Strauss, Reebok, Apple, Carlsberg and Heineken - have signalled their intention to pull out of Burma. Australian companies are beginning to do the same. ACTU assistant secretary Mr Bill Mansfield said this showed Australian firms could make decisions that took human rights into account. "Human rights organisations around the world have evidence of forced labour in Burma," Mr Mansfield said. "It is impossible to avoid the conclusion that the use of forced labour represents the central feature of the regime's infrastructure development policy," he said. ASEAN countries agreed to a constructive engagement with Burma at their ministerial conference of 1994, prompting Australia to outline a "benchmark" approach to its own relationship with the military regime. Under this approach, Australia has signalled it would be prepared to accept Burma's re-entry into international forums if SLORC can show progress on human rights and democratisation. But there are signs that Australia's bipartisan approach to this "benchmark" policy may be crumbling, with Labor calling for a tougher stance against Burma. The Australian Council for Overseas Aid (ACFOA) called on the Government yesterday to protest against the arrest of U Kyi Maung. "The Australian Government should respond strongly to this increased persecution of democracy politicians," said its executive director, Ms Janet Hunt. **************************************************************** TT: BONN HALTS SHORTWAVE TRANSMITTER FOR BURMA October 25, 1996 (abriged) Thailand Times DEUTSCHE PRESS-AGENTUR BONN: The German government apparently blocked a commercial deal under which a Burmese opposition radio station would have used a shortwave transmission facility belonging to the state-owned Telekom AG, a company spokesman said. "If the government says 'wait a minute', we have to respect this," said Hans Ehnert, a spokesman for Telekom AG in Bonn, adding that Chancellor Helmut Kohl's government had informed Telekom of its deep reservations about the deal. "We cannot just sweep aside government concern over a business (deal)," said Ehnert. A German Foreign Ministry spokesman admitted earlier the government had told Telekom of its reservations over the deal under which the opposition radio station, the Democratic Voice of Burma, would have been allowed to use a shortwave facility in Juelich. "We have reservations about allowing German frequencies to be used by any foreign opposition group," said the spokesman who stressed, however, that Bonn had not banned the deal. The Oslo-based radio station, which backs Burmese opposition leader and Nobel Peace Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi, had wanted to use the transmitter for improving the reception quality of its daily one-hour program to Burma, according to a report in Berlin's Tageszeitung daily. The Voice of Burma is backed financially by Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the United States, said the Tageszeitung. Under the now canceled deal Telekom AG was to have received US$100,000 per year for providing the transmission capacity, the newspaper said. Shares for the first stage of Telekom AG' s privatization are due to go on sale in November. The 500 million shares represent about 20 per cent of the company's equity. ***************************************************************** CHRO: APPEAL TO U.N AND INTERNATIONAL AGENCIES October 21, 1996 (Chin Human Rights Organization) From: chan@fdhr.unv.ernet.in CHIN HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANIZATION CHINLAND P.O.BOX (5), Bandarban-4600 Bangladesh Tel / Fax : 880-361-468 Appeal to UN, International Agencies and Organizations to Request the Stop of Brutal Killings and Arrests of Village Chiefs By the Burmese Army. Mr. Bawi Kung, Haka (the capital of Chin State), Burma who returned back from Mizoram State on 09/10/96, was brutally murdered by the Burmese Army. Second Lieutanant Soe Tun, who is the commander of Hriphi Post ( Than Tlang Township ) under No.266 Light Infantry Battalion, based his headquarters at Haka. He was accompanied by 30 armies and went to Ngalang village, Than Tlang Township. On 09/10/96 without prior notice the villagers were surrounded at about 5:00 pm on 09/10/96. Mr. Bawi Kung and his two friends of Pa Sui and Pa Lian intended to enter the village to sleep for one night. When they arrived at the village, the Burmese Army shot at them, killing Mr. Bawi Kung immediately. Two of his friends tried to flee away but Pa Lian was arrested. Pa Sui escaped and informed the CHRO about the matter. A member of CHRO, Mr. Biak Ceu went to Ngalang village on 11/10/96 to enquire further about the incident. Acccording to Mr. Biak Ceu the body of Mr. Bawi Kung was rolled with blanket and nobody was permitted to take it. The Burmese Army ordered the villagers to bury it as soon as possible. A curfew order was declared until the next afternoon. All the village elders who didnt know the names of CNF ( Chin National Front ) leaders were tortured. Mr. Pamaung was hit with their guns several times on his body so that he is now being looked after under medical care and is in a serious condition.