#! /bin/sh # This is a shell archive. Remove anything before this line, then unpack # it by saving it into a file and typing "sh file". To overwrite existing # files, type "sh file -c". You can also feed this as standard input via # unshar, or by typing "sh 'ReadMe.1st' <<'END_OF_FILE' X Before you use the DDLI, it is very important that you read certain Xparts of the documentation. The most important of these is "How to Use the XDDLI." This not only explains program usage; it explains what you should Xbear in mind when you are trying to answer the questions. You should also Xread "Understanding the Results of the DDLI." This will help you understand Xhow to use the results of the program to figure out your type. X X It is important that you realize that the DDLI might not be Xterribly reliable, and that you can do your part to make it more reliable. XTo make it more reliable, I need to get FEEDBACK on how each of the 16 Xtypes tends to answer each question. Any feedback you give me will remain Xconfidential, and I will put your name and type in the acknowledgements Xonly if you give me explicit permission. X X Please note however that your feedback will be most valuable if you Xalready know your type. If you have taken other Jungian-based type Xpersonality instruments, or you have determined Xyour type by some other means, your feedback will be valuable. But if all Xyou have to go on are the results of the DDLI, your feedback will not be as Xhelpful. But if you can verify or disconfirm your results on the DDLI by Xreading descriptions of the types and figuring out which one best fits you, Xyour feedback will be valuable. X X Finally, I can't stress enough how important your feedback will be Xto the development of the DDLI. Without feedback, I cannot hone the Xquestions in the DDLI and so make it more reliable. For further details, Xread "How You Can Help" in the documentation. END_OF_FILE if test 1585 -ne `wc -c <'ReadMe.1st'`; then echo shar: \"'ReadMe.1st'\" unpacked with wrong size! fi # end of 'ReadMe.1st' fi if test -f 'DDLI.DOC' -a "${1}" != "-c" ; then echo shar: Will not clobber existing file \"'DDLI.DOC'\" else echo shar: Extracting \"'DDLI.DOC'\" \(29067 characters\) sed "s/^X//" >'DDLI.DOC' <<'END_OF_FILE' X Brief Description X X The Duniho and Duniho Life Pattern Indicator (DDLI) is a program Xthat asks you questions in order to determine your Life Pattern. X The Life Patterns utilize the same sixteen psychological types measured by Jungian type personality instruments, and are also represented by the same four-letter types. However, results may vary from instrument to instrument. By using knowledge that Terence Duniho has added to the Xstudy of Type, this program also checks itself by asking supplementary Xquestions about other preferences that correlate with a person's type. X X Copyright X X The DDLI and this documentation are Copyright (C) 1992, 1993 by XFergus Duniho. Most of its questions are drawn from and based on those in Xtwo questionaires by Terence Duniho. These are his "Preference Patterns XQuestionaire" and "What is Your Personality Pattern?" from his book X_Wholeness Lies Within: Sixteen Natural Paths Toward Sprituality_. "What is XYour Personality Preference" is Copyright (C) 1985, 1991 by Terence L. XDuniho. Fergus Duniho uses questions from these questionaires with the Xpermission of Terence Duniho. X X Contents X X The following should be included: X X README.1ST - A file you should read before using the DDLI. X X DDLI.C - The main source code. X X FPDIO.C - A file containing the source code for some input/output X functions I wrote. X X QST.C - A file containing the qst type and the functions that use X it. X X STRDUP.C - A file containing the "strdup" command in case you don't X have it. X X DDLI.DOC - This file, the documentation. X X DDLI.QST - The file of questions used by the DDLI. X X Distribution X X The latest version of the DDLI may be freely distributed as long as Xit is left unchanged, and it always distributed with its source code X(DDLI.C, QST.C, FPDIO.C, STRDUP.C), this documentation file, and DDLI.QST, Xwhich contains the questions. It may be, but does not have to be, Xdistributed with any executables. If you want to distribute it with Xcommercial products, such as books on Type, you need the written permission Xof the author. X X Whenever I release a new version, please stop distributing older Xversions. Please remove older versions from software libraries, disk Xcollections, and electronic bulletin boards. This is especially important Xwhen older versions had bugs. X X Compiling X X You may have to compile ddli.c to run the DDLI on your computer. XThe DDLI is a completely portable Standard ANSI/ISO C program. You should Xbe able to compile it and run it on any computer that has a Standard C Xcompiler. X X First, look at ddli.c in a text editor and make sure that the Xpreprocessor definition for OPSYS is set to the operating system that you Xwant to compile ddli.c for. It should be set to AMIGA, MSDOS, or OTHER. XIf OPSYS isn't set for your operating system, set it to your operating Xsystem and resave ddli.c. X X Next, make sure that the source files are all in the same Xdirectory. If your operating system is case-sensitive, make sure the C Xsource code file names are lowercase. Then type "cc ddli.c -o ddli". You Xmay have to change "cc" to the name of the frontend for your compiler, such Xas "dcc", "bcc", or "gcc". X X If you use an IBM or compatible, you may have to add carriage Xreturns (ASCII 13) to the end of each line (unless somebody has already Xdone it for you). The Amiga, which I use, uses only the newline character Xto end each line, but the IBM uses both a newline and a carriage return. X X If it doesn't compile, it may be because your C compiler doesn't Xhave the "strdup" function. In that case, uncomment the line which Xincludes "strdup.c" and try to compile it again. X X DISCLAIMER X X I offer no guarantee that this program will accurately measure your Xtype. I am not a trained psychologist, and I have tested these questions on Xonly a few people. I have mainly used my knowledge of type to put them Xtogether. Although most were written by Terence Duniho, whose life work is Xpsychological type, I wrote some of them, particularly the supplementary Xquestions. This program is experimental, and I hope to use the Xcomputer-user community as my testing ground. If you already know your Xtype, I would greatly appreciate it if you would report on the accuracy of Xthis program. X X Also, if this program somehow messes up your computer or your data, XI, Fergus Duniho, am not to blame. You use this program at your own risk. X X Furthermore, I am not responsible for any use that anyone makes of Xthis program or its results. If, for example, someone chooses to Xdiscriminate against you because of the type you scored as on the DDLI, you Xshould sue the person who discriminated against you, not me. X X The Life Pattern Model X X The Life Pattern model is based on Carl Gustav Jung's four Xpsychological functions. These are thinking, feeling, sensing, and Xintuition. The former two are judging functions, and the latter two are Xperceiving functions. The judging functions are those we use for making Xdecisions. The perceiving functions are those we use for gathering Xinformation. According to Jung, the personality of each person is Xcharacterized by the dominance of one of these functions over the others. XHe also added that each person used his dominant function is either an Xextraverted way or an introverted way. Someone who used his dominant Xfunction in an extraverted way would rely on it when dealing with the Xexternal environment, such as in public settings, with people who aren't Xintimates, etc. Someone who used his dominant function in an introverted Xway would rely on it when alone or with intimates. Thus, Jung's personality Xtheory had eight psychological types. These were Introverted Sensors, XIntroverted Intuitors, Introverted Thinkers, Introverted Feelers, XExtraverted Sensors, Extraverted Intuitors, Extraverted Thinkers, and XExtraverted Feelers. X X Jung also held that each type had an auxiliary function, as well as Xthe dominant function. For the sake of balance, the auxiliary for a Xpsychologically healthy individual was a perceiving function if the Xdominant was a judging function and a judging function if the dominant was Xa perceiving function. Furthermore, a person would use the auxiliary in the Xopposite way as the dominant function. Extraverts would rely on the Xauxiliary for introverting, and introverts would rely on it for Xextraverting. X X The introduction of the auxiliary split each of Jung's types into Xtwo, effectively giving us Myers-Briggs' sixteen psychological types. For Xexample, Introverted Thinkers would be divided into Introverted Thinkers Xwith Intuition as an auxiliary and Introverted Thinkers with Sensing as an Xauxiliary. The Myers-Briggs types are based on four sets of opposing Xpreferences. These are extraversion vs. introversion (E vs. I), intuition Xvs. sensing (N vs. S), thinking vs. feeling (T vs. F), and perceiving vs. Xjudging (P vs. J). The preference for extraversion or introversion Xindicates the way in which a person uses his dominant function. The Xpreference for perceiving or judging indicates which function (the dominant Xor the auxiliary) the person relies on for extraverting. As I already Xindicated, the dominant and the auxiliary together include both a Xperceiving function and a judging function. P's rely on the perceiving Xfunction for extraverting, and J's rely on the judging function for Xextraverting. The preference for thinking or feeling indicates the Xpreferred judging function, and the preference for sensing or intuition Xindicates the preferred perceiving function. X X Using this information, we can determine the Jungian type that Xcorresponds to each Myers-Briggs type. Take, for instance, my type: INTP. XThe "I" indicates that I use my dominant function for introverting. The "P" Xindicates that I rely on my preferred perceiving function for extraverting. XSince I am an introvert, this means that I rely on my preferred judging Xfunction for introverting. In other words, my dominant function is my Xpreferred judging function. Since this is thinking, that means I am an XIntroverted Thinker. My auxiliary is my preferred perceiving function, and Xthat is intuition. Therefore, an INTP is an Introverted Thinker with XIntuition as an auxiliary. Each Myers-Briggs type can be translated into Xits corresponding Jungian type in like manner. Here is a table of what each Xtype corresponds to: X X INTP: Introverted Thinker with auxiliary Intuition X ISTP: Introverted Thinker with auxiliary Sensing X INFP: Introverted Feeler with auxiliary Intuition X ISFP: Introverted Feeler with auxiliary Sensing X INTJ: Introverted Intuitor with auxiliary Thinking X INFJ: Introverted Intuitor with auxiliary Feeling X ISTJ: Introverted Sensor with auxiliary Thinking X ISFJ: Introverted Sensor with auxiliary Feeling X ENTJ: Extraverted Thinker with auxiliary Intuition X ESTJ: Extraverted Thinker with auxiliary Sensing X ENFJ: Extraverted Feeler with auxiliary Intuition X ESFJ: Extraverted Feeler with auxiliary Sensing X ENTP: Extraverted Intuitor with auxiliary Thinking X ENFP: Extraverted Intuitor with auxiliary Feeling X ESTP: Extraverted Sensor with auxiliary Thinking X ESFP: Extraverted Sensor with auxiliary Feeling X X The Myers-Briggs model was extended into the Life Patterns model by XTerence Duniho. According to Terence Duniho, each type also has a tertiary Xfunction and an inferior function. These balance the dominant and auxiliary Xfunctions. The tertiary function is used in the same way as the dominant Xfunction (extraverted or introverted), but it is not relied on to the same Xextent. Also, the tertiary function is always the opposite of the auxiliary Xfunction. If the auxiliary is a judging function, the tertiary is the other Xjudging function; if the auxiliary is a perceiving function, the tertiary Xis the other perceiving function. The inferior function is always the Xopposite of the dominant function, and it is used in the same way as the Xauxiliary. Therefore, the introduction of the tertiary and inferior Xfunctions do not extend the number of psychological types. There are still Xsixteen. X X The advantage of the Life Pattern model is that it gives us more Xtools for understanding each type. Instead of telling us how each type uses Xtwo of Jung's functions, it tells us how each type uses all four of Jung's Xfunctions. In effect, it gives us a blueprint for understanding the core Xpersonality of each type. This blueprint describes the preferential Xhierarchy among Jung's four functions for each type, and it describes the Xway in which each type uses each of the four functions. X X First, there are eight different hierarchies among the sixteen Xtypes. Using a form of abbreviation in which the leftmost letter represents Xthe dominant function, these are TNSF for INTPs and ENTJs, TSNF for ISTPs Xand ESTJs, FNST for INFPs and ENFJs, FSNT for ISFPs and ESFJs, NTFS for XINTJs and ENTPs, NFTS for INFJs and ENFPs, STFN for ISTJs and ESTPs, and XSFTN for ISFJs and ESFPs. X X Second, the Life Pattern model characterizes each type by how it Xuses the four functions. Extraverts use the dominant and tertiary functions Xfor extraverting, and the other two functions for introverting. Introverts Xuse the dominant and tertiary functions for introverting, and the other two Xfor extraverting. Given the eight possible hierarchies of preference, this Xgives us four different ways in which the 16 types use the four functions. XI call these four different ways directional patterns, for they indicate Xthe direction (outward or inward) in which each function is used. Using a Xform of abbreviation in which "I" and "E" indicate the direction in which a Xfunction is used, these are IT-EF-IN-ES for ISTPs, ENFJs, INFJs, and ESTPs, XET-IF-IN-ES for INTJs, ESFPs, ISFPs, and ENTJs, IT-EF-EN-IS for INTPs, XESFJs, ISFJs, and ENTPs, and ET-IF-EN-IS for INFPs, ESTJs, ISTJs, and XENFPs. X X One interesting consequence of this model is that it gives us three Xdifferent ways of understanding how someone's type can be the opposite of Xsomeone else's. I call these hierarchical, directional, and diametrical Xopposites. Hierarchical opposites have opposite hierarchies but the same Xdiretional patterns. Hierarchical opposites never have any letters in Xcommon in their abbreviations. Directional opposites have the same Xdirectional patterns but opposite hierarchies. These always have the inner Xtwo letters the same and the outer two different. And diametrical opposites Xhave both opposite hierarchies and opposite directional patterns. These Xhave the outer two letters the same and the inner two different. X X Here is a chart that describes the directional hierarchy of each Xtype. The functions appear left to right from dominant to inferior. "I" Xindicates that the function is used for introverting, and "E" indicates Xthat the function is used for extraverting. X X INTP: IT-EN-IS-EF X ISTP: IT-ES-IN-EF X INFP: IF-EN-IS-ET X ISFP: IF-ES-IN-ET X INTJ: IN-ET-IF-ES X INFJ: IN-EF-IT-ES X ISTJ: IS-ET-IF-EN X ISFJ: IS-EF-IT-EN X ENTJ: ET-IN-ES-IF X ESTJ: ET-IS-EN-IF X ENFJ: EF-IN-ES-IT X ESFJ: EF-IS-EN-IT X ENTP: EN-IT-EF-IS X ENFP: EN-IF-ET-IS X ESTP: ES-IT-EF-IN X ESFP: ES-IF-ET-IN X X For further information about Type, the Life Pattern model, and the Xsixteen different Life Patterns, consult Terence Duniho's book _Wholeness XLies Within_, or some other book about Type. _Wholeness Lies Within_ can be Xordered from Type & Temperment, Inc., PO Box 200, Gladwyne, PA 19032 for X$14.95 + $2.09 p/h. Terence Duniho also recommends _LifeTypes_ by Sandra XHirsh & Jean Kummerow (Warner Books) and _Gifts Differing_ by Isabel Briggs XMyers (Consulting Psychologists Press). X X How to Use the DDLI X X Unless it has been compiled for msdos, the DDLI will first ask you Xhow many columns you have on your screen. This is so it can wordwrap the Xtext to fit on any screen size. It will then ask for your name. It expects Xthat your name will be less than 80 characters long. X X The DDLI will then ask you a series of questions. You can answer a Xquestion by typing the letter that precedes the answer you choose: an A or Xa B. You should follow your answer with a carriage return. After you have Xchosen your preference, it will ask you to rank that preference on a Xscale of 1 to 7. This will allow you to weight how important a preference Xis to you. If you want to go back to a question you previously answered and Xchange your answer, you can go back to the previous question by typing X"Prev" or just "P" followed by a carriage return. Keep doing this until you Xget back to the question you want to answer differently. After you have Xchanged your answer, the DDLI will resume with the next question that you Xhaven't answered. If you want to postpone answering a question until later, Xtype "Skip" or just "S" followed by a carriage return. You will see this Xquestion again after you have gone through the remaining questions. If you Xwant to quit the DDLI, type "Quit" or just "Q" followed by a carriage Xreturn. Whatever you type in while answering the questions, the DDLI will Xread only the first character. If it isn't an "A," "B," "P," "Q," or "S," Xthe DDLI will tell you what sort of input it expects from you. X X When you answer each question, there are some things you should Xbear in mind. X X 1. Do not base your answer simply on the most recent event in X your life that fits the question. Rather, base your answer on X your general pattern of behavior, not your behavior on one X occasion. X X 2. Do not answer the questions according to how you want to be X when that differs from how you actually are. Base your answers X on how you actually are. X X 3. Do not stretch your imagination by trying to imagine situations X that are favorable for each answer. Rather, base your answers X on how you are in the situations you normally find yourself in. X X Here are some other tips on answering the questions. If one answer Ximmediately seems more you than the other, go with that answer. For Xquestions where this doesn't work, ask yourself which answer would take Xless energy or be more natural. X X Finally, remember that this is not a test. Nobody has an answer key Xwith the right answers in it. The right answers depend upon who you are. XThis program does not measure degrees of normality and abnormality. It Xmerely measures differences that may exist between normal, psychologically Xhealthy individuals. X X Understanding the Results of the DDLI X X After you have answered all the questions, the DDLI will display Xthe results to two different sets of questions. The first set of questions Xmeasures for extraversion vs. introversion, sensing vs. intuition, thinking Xvs. feeling, and judging vs. perceiving. These are the same four sets of Xpreferences that other Jungian-based type personality instruments measures Xfor. It first presents your scores on Xthese questions and tells you what type they indicate. If you unambigously Xscore as a definite type, the DDLI then presents the directional hierarchy Xof functions for that type. If you score as an X-type, it doesn't. X-types Xare not real types. An "X" in a type means it is uncertain which way the Xpreference goes, not that there is no preference. X X The second set of questions measures for preferences that other XJungian-based type personality instruments Xdo not measure for. These are extraverted thinking and introverted Xfeeling vs. extraverted feeling and introverted thinking, extraverted Xintuition and introverted sensing vs. extraverted sensing and introverted Xintuition, and rationality vs. a-rationality. The pairs of opposites are X X Extraverted Thinking vs. Introverted Thinking X Extraverted Feeling vs. Introverted Feeling X Extraverted Sensing vs. Introverted Sensing X Extraverted Intuition vs. Introverted Intuition X Rationality vs. A-Rationality. X X The DDLI measures for the first two together because the types who Xextravert feeling and introvert thinking are the same, and the types who Xintrovert feeling and extravert thinking are the same. And it measures for Xthe second pair together because the types who extravert sensing and Xintrovert intuition are the same, and the types who extravert intuition and Xintrovert sensing are the same. X X The DDLI presents the scores on these questions and then indicates Xwhich types these scores suggest. These two types are always 4-letter Xopposites, which I referred to previously as hierarchical opposites. This Xis because these questions measure for directional preferences and for only Xone hierarchical preference. Hierarchical opposites, as you may recall, Xhave the same directional patterns but opposite hierarchies. And any two Xtypes with opposite hierarchies have the same the same kind of dominant Xfunction: a judging function (thinking or feeling) or a perceiving function X(sensing or intuition). X X Finally, the DDLI compares the type suggested by your answers to Xthe first set of questions with the types suggested by your answers to the Xsecond set of questions. If it finds a match, it tells you that your Xresults on the supplementary questions corroborate your results on the main Xset of questions. It otherwise tells you that your results on these two Xsets of questions conflict. X X If there is a conflict between your scores, there is no rule for Xdetermining which one is right. You should get ahold of a description of Xthe types and read the descriptions for each of the types that the program Xsuggests you are. And even if your scores don't conflict, you should read Xthe descriptions of the type you scored as to really make sure you are that Xtype. There is no guarantee that this program will accurately measure your Xtype. I think that in most cases it will, but in your case it might not. If Xit doesn't, I hope you will offer your suggestions for making this program Xmore accurate in the future. X X History X X V 1.00 (12/31/1992) - The first version X X Bug: It displays the functional hierarchy of X an ENTP no matter what type you scored as. X X V 1.01 (01/03/1993) - Bug fix. X A few changes and additions to QST. X X Bug: When it displays the functional X hierarchy of the type you scored as, it X assumes that you scored as an extravert, even X in you scored as an introvert. X X V 1.10 (01/07/1993) - Bug Fix plus Feature Update. X Can now send output to printer or file. X Displays scores to supplementary questions. X One grammatical correction in QST. X One question in QST replaced with another. X X V 2.00 (01/31/1993) - Because I switched from the crippled freeware X version of DICE to GNU C, I added some X features that I couldn't previously put into X the DDLI. Here are the new features: X X * Randomizes question order and answer order. X * Allows you to skip questions until later. X * Allows you to go back to questions and change X your answers. X * Displays output in a more understandable X format. X * QST renamed as "DDLI.QST" X * Some major changes in DDLI.QST. X * DDLI.QST now groups together questions that X measure for the same preference. X * Reads "DDLI.QST" all at once and closes it X before asking any questions. This means you X no longer have to keep the disk with the X questions on it in your disk drive when you X are running the DDLI. X * Saves a file that contains a record of all X your answers. Sending me this file will help X me make the DDLI more reliable. X X V 2.01 (02/26/1993) - It turns out that I could incorporate the X additions to V2.00 with DICE. This version X has all the same features, and I have X compiled the Amiga version with DICE so that X it will not require ixemul.library to run. X (If you have GNU C, you might want to X recompile it, since the GNU C version takes X up less space.) X X It's essentially the inside, rather than the X outside, of the program that has changed with X this version. The main difference is that X this version stores the questions in a linked X list instead of in an array. This is to X prevent memory fragmentation errors that X occur from asking for a large chunk of X memory. X X V 2.02 (04/04/1993) The DDLI now puts a linefeed after the X version string when it creates a record of X your answers. X X ".raw" files renamed ".dar". X X Added Readme.1st. X X The "wrapwrite" function in fpdio.c now takes X multiple arguments. X X V 2.03 (12/03/1993) Removed my GEnie address from the text X printed at the beginning of the program, X because I have quit GEnie. X X Changed my address in the documentation, X because I moved over the summer. X X V 2.04 (12/04/1993) Bug fixes to make it work with less X forgiving compilers than I have for my X Amiga. X X V 3.00 (12/11/1993) Preprocessor instructions make it easier to X compile the DDLI for different operating X systems. X X It no longer asks for a seed value for the X random number generator. Instead, it counts X clock ticks to get a seed value. X X Instead of just creating a "*.dar" file, it X asks you if you want a record of your scores X created, and then it asks you for a filename X for it. X X Added the "yesno" function to "fpdio.c". X X Added the "pow" function to "ddli.c" X X Previous versions failed to randomize the X order of the answers to each question. This X version doesn't fail to. X X Asks you to rank the strength of each of your X answers on a scale from 1 to 7. Includes X strength ranking in record of raw scores. X X More questions. Some questions removed or X changed. X X Acknowledgements X X The individual acknowledgements are listed in historical order: X X My INFJ father, Terence Duniho, for providing the theoretical Xstructure behind this program plus most of the questions. X X INTP Gerald Erichsen for compiling the IBM version, for a bug Xreport on version 1.00, and for suggesting the printing feature. X X INFP Kirk Worcester for a bug report on version 1.01. X X ENFP Jayne Thrall for letting me test a bunch of questions on her. X X INTP Mark Lillibridge for most of the bug fixes made to V. 2.04. X X And those who have given me feedback on GEnie. X X How You Can Help X X The DDLI is in constant development, and your feedback can make it Xmore reliable. The simplest thing you can do is send me a copy of your Xraw scores. After you have answered all the questions, the DDLI will ask Xyou if it may create a record of your scores. I would appreciate it very Xmuch if you would email me a copy of this record. I intend to write a Xdatabase program that will interpret these records and give me statistical Xdata on them so that I can determine which questions work best. My email Xaddresses are below. X X If you want to do more, you can tell me why you answered the Xquestions as you did. It will be particularly helpful if you tell me why Xyou chose answers that conflicted with your type. X X About the Author X X I am Fergus Duniho, the 26 year old INTP son of INFJ Terence XDuniho, the Executive Director of the newly formed Life Patterns Institute. XExcept for this filial relationship, I have no associations with the Life XPatterns Institute, and I am completely unassociated with any other Xorganization devoted to the study of psychological type. Although I am Xknowledgeable on the subject of psychological type, I'm probably not an Xexpert on the subject. X X I am currently a Ph.D. candidate and a T.A. in the philosophy Xdepartment at the University of Rochester. I plan to teach philosophy to Xundergraduates after I get my degree. My calling is to be a teacher. X X Besides this program, I have written other freeware for the Amiga. XThese include DMD, a set of macros for Matt Dillon's text editor, DME, and XSilly Syllogisms, a syllogisms tutor in Amiga Basic. X X You can reach me by email or by post. You can reach me through the XInternet at fdnh@troi.cc.rochester.edu. You can also send me email on the XFileWorks BBS in Rochester, NY. You can reach me through regular mail at X X Fergus Duniho X 1095 Genesee St. X Rochester, NY 14611 X X If you want me to reply back to you, it is best to use email, since XI don't keep a large supply of stamps. END_OF_FILE if test 29067 -ne `wc -c <'DDLI.DOC'`; then echo shar: \"'DDLI.DOC'\" unpacked with wrong size! fi # end of 'DDLI.DOC' fi if test -f 'DDLI.QST' -a "${1}" != "-c" ; then echo shar: Will not clobber existing file \"'DDLI.QST'\" else echo shar: Extracting \"'DDLI.QST'\" \(11747 characters\) sed "s/^X//" >'DDLI.QST' <<'END_OF_FILE' XDDLI.QST V 1.03 XWhich better fits how you see yourself? X1Sociable X2Intimate XWhich are you more concerned with? X1Breadth X2Depth XAt a party, is it easier for you to be: X1A participant X2An observer XIs it more accurate to describe the things you know as X1Miscellaneous X2Specialized XIf you had to choose, would you prefer to be skillful in games X1That call for team play X2Where you play singly and are solely responsible for results XWhich better fits how you see yourself? X1Lively X2Calm XDo your core interests tend to be X1Varied (and changing) X2Few (and lasting) XWhen working on a project: X1Are you mainly just concerned that it gets done X2Do you prefer to have ownership from start to finish XDo you do your most productive work: X1In working with others X2When working alone XDo you generally: X1Have plenty of energy for anything that comes up X2Find it necessary to focus your energy XWhich comes closer to describing you: X1A "Jack of all trades" X2Expert in one or two areas XWhich do you prefer more: X1Figuring things out by doing X2Figuring things out before doing XWhen looking up information on a particular topic, do you more often: X1Get sidetracked X2Find out what you need and get back to the project at hand XWould you rather be recognized for X2Something you have done yourself X1Your part in a group undertaking XCan you X2Find a lot to say only to certain people or on certain topics X1Talk easily with almost anyone on almost anything XWhich better fits how you see yourself? X2Watchful X1Trustful XWhich better fits how you see yourself? X2Reserved X1Outgoing XAt a social gathering, is it more important for you to: X2Spend more time with a few X1Spend some time with everybody XWhen you need to re-energize, do you prefer to be X1In a group of people X2By yourself XWhich better fits how you see yourself? X3Matter-of-fact X4Imaginative XWhich do you focus on more? X3The way things are X4The way things could be XWhich do you do more often? X3Experience the present moment for what it offers X4Experience the present in terms of the future XDo you think it more important to X3Be able to adjust to the facts as they are X4Be able to see the possibilities in a situation XWhich better fits how you see yourself? X4An interpreter of life X3An experiencer of life XDo you prefer to be more X3Practical X4Ingenious XDo you prefer dealing more with: X3"Visible" (concrete) information X4"Invisible" (abstract) information XIn doing something that many others do, does it appeal to you more to X3Do it the way you have been taught X4Figure out a way of your own XWhich work role would suit you better: X3Doing familiar things with some variety X4Doing things that are new and full of unknown possibilities XWhich do you prefer more: X3Using what you've learned X4Learning new things XAre you inclined to: X3Fix things that are broken X4See ways to improve things that aren't broken XWhen you need to solve a problem, are you more inclined to X3Go with a solution that your experience tells you will do the job X4Use your ingenuity to find a novel solution than is better than any you know from experience XWhich do you prefer: X3Focusing on what is happening right now X4Looking ahead to the future XDo you more often: X3Accept things as they are X4Want to change things XAt home are you more apt to: X3Be more content with the way your furniture is arranged X4Want to rearrange the furniture occasionally XIs it harder for you to accept X4Routine ("the beaten path") X3Constant change XWhich better fits how you see yourself? X4Emphasis on possibilities X3Emphasis on facts XWhich do you think you have more of: X4Vision X3Common sense XDo you more often let X5Your head rule your heart X6Your heart rule your head XDo you more readily: X5Objectively critique ideas and people X6Empathize with people and their ideas XAre you more often: X5Truthful X6Tactful XWhich better fits how you see yourself? X5Thinking X6Feeling XWhen you have spoken less than the whole truth to a friend, is your motivation more often: X5An intellectual awareness of likely consequences X6A concern to not give offense XWhen looking at past events, are you more interested in: X5Understanding why the events happened the way they did X6Seeing how they affected those who were involved XIn working out decisions, do you prefer to: X5Make sure things fit together X6Go with what feels best XWhen you are interested in a new activity, are you more likely to approach it with: X5Calm, keeping your eyes open to see how things work X6Excitement and enthusiasm -- at least inwardly XWhich is more important to you in making decisions: X5Cause and effect (consequences) X6Good versus bad XWhich would you rather do: X5What you think will work out X6What just feels right to you XIs it more important for you to be appreciated: X5For something you have accomplished X6For the kind of person you are XWhich kind of decisions are more natural for you? X6Those that call on your feelings and personally involve you X5Those that call on your knowledge and don't personally involve you XWhich is more important to you: X6To recognize the value of individuals X5To follow principles that make sense XWhich better fits how you see yourself? X6Harmony X5Truth XWhich kind of decisions are more natural for you? X6Those that call on your feelings X5Those that call on your knowledge XWhich are you better at providing: X6Emotional support X5Objective criticism XDo you believe it is a greater strength to X6Be aware of other's feelings X5Be clear about what is true XAre you better at making decisions that: X6Are logically based X5Honor your awareness of emotional values XIn deciding something important, which do you trust more X6Your emotions X5Your reason XAre you more inclined to evaluate people as X6Good and evil X7Moral and immoral XAre you more likely to: X6Be aware of other people's feelings X5Hurt other people's feelings without realizing it XWhich is more important to you? X6Relationships that are harmonious X5Relationships that are honest XAfter deciding on a course of action, is it more natural for you to: X7See it through to completion, even if a bit inconvenient X8Reconsider it if unforeseen circumstances become known to you XWhen you know ahead of time that you will be doing a certain thing at a certain time, is it: X7Comfortable to be able to plan accordingly X8Unduly constraining to be tied down XWhich do you more often do: X7Insist that others adjust to your schedule X8Adjust to the schedule of others XWhich fits better with how others see you: X7Deliberate X8Spontaneous XWhich fits better with how others see you: X7Decisive X8Openminded XWhich are you more inclined to do? X7Stick to your plans X8Go with the flow XWhen a new situation comes up that conflicts with your plans, do you tend to: X8Stick with your original plans X7Adjust to the new situation XWhen you make decisions, are you more often: X7Concerned with having things wrapped up X8Interested in keeping your options open as long as you can XAt a meeting, would you more often prefer to: X7Make sure things are not left "up in the air" unnecessarily X8Make sure your questions have been answered before deciding things XWhen others make plans will you more often: X7Expect them to be followed through on as agreed X8Expect them to be followed flexibly XIn your social life, do you prefer to: X7Schedule commitments X8Stay open to do whatever seems right in the moment XWhen you are behind schedule: X7Is it essential to catch back up X8Do you accept it as part of the day XWhen a new situation comes up that conflicts with your plans, do you X8Try first to change your plans to fit the situation X7Try first to change the situation to fit your plans XWhen others force you to change your plans at the last minute, do you often: X8Adjust fairly quickly X7Feel irritation that an adjustment is required XDo you prefer to X8Be free to do whatever looks like fun when the time comes X7Arrange dates, parties, etc. in advance XWhich fits better with how others see you: X8Flexible X7Scheduled XWhen dealing with others, more often than not, are you happier when X8You have enough information, though settling things may be delayed X7Things are settled XAre you more likely to: X9Look before you leap X0Leap before you look XAre you more likely to know something X0Quickly and immediately X9Only after you have checked it out XIs it more natural for you to see life in X9Black and white X0Shades of grey XAre you more likely to make decisions because: X0They fit with your sense of things X9Careful consideration has convinced you XDo you more often X9Double check your perceptions X0Trust your perceptions XWhich do you tend to trust more? X0Your perceptions X9Your judgements XAre you more likely to believe something because: X0It simply seems right X9You have sufficient evidence XWhich is more natural for you when dealing with other people? X10To be aware of your empathy (or anger) toward people X11To be aware of what works or doesn't work (cause/effect) in people relationships XWhich are you better at organizing? X10Ideas on paper X11Your personal possessions XWhich do you keep less cluttered? X10Your mind X11Your room or office? XDo you often feel that other people should value the same things you value? X10Yes X11No XDo you more often make better logical decisions: X11When talking with others X10When you're able to think quietly by yourself XWhen something goes wrong, who are you more inclined to blame first? X11Yourself X10Others XDo you think more logically when you are X11With other people X10By yourself XDo you express your thoughts more clearly X11When you are speaking to other people X10When you are writing XIs it easier for you to think of excuses for X11The actions of others X10Your own actions XWhen you're dealing with strangers, are you more inclined to X11To tell people what to do X10To ask people to do what you would like XWhen you know people well, are you more inclined to X11Feel a special bond with them X10Take them for granted XWhich are you better at X11Organizing people to complete a project X10Fitting facts into a theoretical structure XDo your feelings come on strongest when you are X11Alone X10In the company of other people XWhich do you tend to focus on more? X11What you are feeling X10What you believe other people are feeling XAre you more prone to be warm and friendly X10With people you have just met X11Only with people you have gotten to know somewhat XWhen you first meet someone, do you more often X10Act friendly right away X11Keep the person at a distance until you know the person better XDo you regard helping strangers primarily as: X11An expenditure of energy X10A pleasure XWhich do you tend to laugh at more? X12"Earthy" humor and stories with a surprise ending X13Absurd situations, sudden and unexpected occurances, and word plays XDo you tend to: X12Have a fairly wide range of appreciation without very often feeling much intensity about what you like or don't like X13Instinctually know what you like or don't like (e.g., in food, art, music, clothing, etc.) XWith food, art, music, clothing, etc., are you by nature: X13Rather picky about what you like or don't like X12Fairly tolerant and able to appreciate a range of choices XWhen first learning about something, do you tend to deal with: X12All the facts because they're there X13Only those facts that you decide are pertinent XWhen you are taking notes, which do you more often write down? X12What the speaker has said word for word X13The gist of what you think the speaker has said XAre you better at seeing possible solutions to: X12Your own problems X13The problems of others XIs your imagination its most active when you are X12Alone X13In the company of others XDo you induldge your senses more when you are X12In the company of others X13Alone XAre you good at brainstorming with a group of people? X13Yes X12No XWhen you look around, do you more often X12See whatever is before your eyes X13See mainly what has special signifigance to you END_OF_FILE if test 11747 -ne `wc -c <'DDLI.QST'`; then echo shar: \"'DDLI.QST'\" unpacked with wrong size! fi # end of 'DDLI.QST' fi echo shar: End of shell archive. exit 0