Newsgroups: news.misc,alt.internet.services,news.future,news.admin.misc,news.groups
Path: news.clark.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!caen!hearst.acc.Virginia.EDU!murdoch!chimera.med.Virginia.EDU!mike
From: mike@chimera.med.Virginia.EDU (Mike Chapman)
Subject: Concordance != Bible (was Re: The Bible of Usenet *may* be changing its name...)
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: chimera.med.virginia.edu
Message-ID: <D3ByqK.945@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU
Organization: Unaffiliated
References: <3fukf8$fb6@clarknet.clark.net> <keoD2zpIt.11K@netcom.com> <144@sdsmail.sds.se> <791559120snz@sysmag.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 1995 16:49:32 GMT
Lines: 21
Xref: news.clark.net news.misc:14906 alt.internet.services:39680 news.future:5507 news.admin.misc:29166 news.groups:125224

In article <791559120snz@sysmag.com>, Paul Clark <prc@sysmag.com> wrote:
>In article <144@sdsmail.sds.se> hermod@sdsmail.sds.se  writes:
>> I'd prefer kippers, as I can relate to them. Concordance it above my
>> knowledge threshold. But then, English is not my native tongue, so I
>> suppose I may be excused, be it either "more accurate" or "more
>> resonant" (whatever that's supposed to mean). 
>> 
>
>Well, English _is_ my native tongue (Real _English_ English ;-), and it's
>over my head too.  I'm not sure if this means a lot outside the UK, but
>how about 'The Compleat Usenet'?

Concordance isn't exactly what I'd call a "big word".  It's not exactly
used properly to refer to this document either - The Usenet Concordance
would be absolutely HUGE, since it would reference the key words of
all the posts on Usenet. :-)
-- 
    Citizen Chapman - Intellectual, Militiaman, Hacker, Leader of Men
mike@chimera.med.virginia.edu	I am solely responsible for the content of
mike%doxy@virginia.edu		this message, and in no way represent any 	
Live free or die!		organization unless otherwise indicated.
