Path: news.clark.net!news.sprintlink.net!tequesta.gate.net!gate.net!bc
From: bc@news.gate.net (Bob Curtis)
Newsgroups: news.misc,alt.internet.services,news.future,news.admin.misc,news.groups
Subject: Re: The Bible of Usenet *may* be changing its name...
Date: 25 Jan 1995 09:57:51 -0500
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <bc.791045675@gate.net>
References: <3fukf8$fb6@clarknet.clark.net> <1995Jan24.063304.17871@midway.uchicago.edu> <keoD2xor1.B66@netcom.com> <D2xxHo.EKH@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
NNTP-Posting-Host: seminole.gate.net
Xref: news.clark.net news.misc:14804 alt.internet.services:39085 news.future:5428 news.admin.misc:28702 news.groups:124002

mike@chimera.med.Virginia.EDU (Mike Chapman) writes:

>In article <keoD2xor1.B66@netcom.com>,
>Kyle Elisabeth Overstreet <keo@netcom.com> wrote:
>>A better term: The Usenet Concordance.

>What's wrong with Bible?

Religious overtones, and not very descriptive of the document. 
Personally, I didn't look at for the first half-dozen times I say the 
post, assuming it was a religious discussion, perhaps preaching 'net 
"morality".

Anyone consider "Usenet Reference Guide"?


