The Project Gutenberg EBook of Mark Rutherford's Deliverance, by M. Rutherford (##2 in our series by Mark Rutherford) Copyright laws are changing all over the world. Be sure to check the copyright laws for your country before downloading or redistributing this or any other Project Gutenberg eBook. This header should be the first thing seen when viewing this Project Gutenberg file. Please do not remove it. Do not change or edit the header without written permission. Please read the "legal small print," and other information about the eBook and Project Gutenberg at the bottom of this file. Included is important information about your specific rights and restrictions in how the file may be used. You can also find out about how to make a donation to Project Gutenberg, and how to get involved. **Welcome To The World of Free Plain Vanilla Electronic Texts** **eBooks Readable By Both Humans and By Computers, Since 1971** *****These eBooks Were Prepared By Thousands of Volunteers!***** Title: Mark Rutherford's Deliverance Author: Mark Rutherford Release Date: March, 2004 [EBook #5338] [Yes, we are more than one year ahead of schedule] [This file was first posted on July 2, 2002] [Most recently updated: July 2, 2002] Edition: 10 Language: English Character set encoding: ASCII
Transcribed from the 1913 Hodder and Stoughton edition by David Price,
email ccx074@coventry.ac.uk
MARK RUTHERFORD’S DELIVERANCE
CHAPTER I - NEWSPAPERS
When I had established myself in my new lodgings in Camden Town, I found
I had ten pounds in my pocket, and again there was no outlook.
I examined carefully every possibility. At last I remembered that
a relative of mine, who held some office in the House of Commons, added
to his income by writing descriptive accounts of the debates, throwing
in by way of supplement any stray scraps of gossip which he was enabled
to collect. The rules of the House as to the admission of strangers
were not so strict then as they are now, and he assured me that if I
could but secure a commission from a newspaper, he could pass me into
one of the galleries, and, when there was nothing to be heard worth
describing, I could remain in the lobby, where I should by degrees find
many opportunities of picking up intelligence which would pay.
So far, so good; but how to obtain the commission? I managed to
get hold of a list of all the country papers, and I wrote to nearly
every one, offering my services. I am afraid that I somewhat exaggerated
them, for I had two answers, and, after a little correspondence, two
engagements. This was an unexpected stroke of luck; but alas!
both journals circulated in the same district. I never could get
together more stuff than would fill about a column and a half, and consequently
I was obliged, with infinite pains, to vary, so that it could not be
recognised, the form of what, at bottom, was essentially the same matter.
This was work which would have been disagreeable enough, if I had not
now ceased in a great measure to demand what was agreeable. In
years past I coveted a life, not of mere sensual enjoyment - for that
I never cared - but a life which should be filled with activities of
the noblest kind, and it was intolerable to me to reflect that all my
waking hours were in the main passed in merest drudgery, and that only
for a few moments at the beginning or end of the day could it be said
that the higher sympathies were really operative. Existence to
me was nothing but these few moments, and consequently flitted like
a shadow. I was now, however, the better of what was half disease
and half something healthy and good. In the first place, I had
discovered that my appetite was far larger than my powers. Consumed
by a longing for continuous intercourse with the best, I had no ability
whatever to maintain it, and I had accepted as a fact, however mysterious
it might be, that the human mind is created with the impulses of a seraph
and the strength of a man. Furthermore, what was I that I should
demand exceptional treatment? Thousands of men and women superior
to myself, are condemned, if that is the proper word to use, to almost
total absence from themselves. The roar of the world for them
is never lulled to rest, nor can silence ever be secured in which the
voice of the Divine can be heard.
My letters were written twice a week, and as each contained a column
and a half, I had six columns weekly to manufacture. These I was
in the habit of writing in the morning, my evenings being spent at the
House. At first I was rather interested, but after a while the
occupation became tedious beyond measure, and for this reason.
In a discussion of any importance about fifty members perhaps would
take part, and had made up their minds beforehand to speak. There
could not possibly be more than three or four reasons for or against
the motion, and as the knowledge that what the intending orator had
to urge had been urged a dozen times before on that very night never
deterred him from urging it again, the same arguments, diluted, muddled,
and mispresented, recurred with the most wearisome iteration.
The public outside knew nothing or very little of the real House of
Commons, and the manner in which time was squandered there, for the
reports were all of them much abbreviated. In fact, I doubt whether
anybody but the Speaker, and one or two other persons in the same position
as myself, really felt with proper intensity what the waste was, and
how profound was the vanity of members and the itch for expression;
for even the reporters were relieved at stated intervals, and the impression
on their minds was not continuous. Another evil result of these
attendances at the House was a kind of political scepticism. Over
and over again I have seen a Government arraigned for its conduct of
foreign affairs. The evidence lay in masses of correspondence
which it would have required some days to master, and the verdict, after
knowing the facts, ought to have depended upon the application of principles,
each of which admitted a contrary principle for which much might be
pleaded. There were not fifty members in the House with the leisure
or the ability to understand what it was which had actually happened,
and if they had understood it, they would not have had the wit to see
what was the rule which ought to have decided the case. Yet, whether
they understood or not, they were obliged to vote, and what was worse,
the constituencies also had to vote, and so the gravest matters were
settled in utter ignorance. This has often been adduced as an
argument against an extended suffrage, but, if it is an argument against
anything, it is an argument against intrusting the aristocracy and even
the House itself with the destinies of the nation; for no dock labourer
could possibly be more entirely empty of all reasons for action than
the noble lords, squires, lawyers, and railway directors whom I have
seen troop to the division bell. There is something deeper than
this scepticism, but the scepticism is the easiest and the most obvious
conclusion to an open mind dealing so closely and practically with politics
as it was my lot to do at this time of my life. Men must be governed,
and when it comes to the question, by whom? I, for one, would far sooner
in the long run trust the people at large than I would the few, who
in everything which relates to Government are as little instructed as
the many and more difficult to move. The very fickleness of the
multitude, the theme of such constant declamation, is so far good that
it proves a susceptibility to impressions to which men hedged round
by impregnable conventionalities cannot yield. {1}
When I was living in the country, the pure sky and the landscape formed
a large portion of my existence, so large that much of myself depended
on it, and I wondered how men could be worth anything if they could
never see the face of nature. For this belief my early training
on the “Lyrical Ballads” is answerable. When I came
to London the same creed survived, and I was for ever thirsting for
intercourse with my ancient friend. Hope, faith, and God seemed
impossible amidst the smoke of the streets. It was now very difficult
for me, except at rare opportunities, to leave London, and it was necessary
for me, therefore, to understand that all that was essential for me
was obtainable there, even though I should never see anything more than
was to be seen in journeying through the High Street, Camden Town, Tottenham
Court Road, the Seven Dials, and Whitehall. I should have been
guilty of a simple surrender to despair if I had not forced myself to
make this discovery. I cannot help saying, with all my love for
the literature of my own day, that it has an evil side to it which none
know except the millions of sensitive persons who are condemned to exist
in great towns. It might be imagined from much of this literature
that true humanity and a belief in God are the offspring of the hills
or the ocean; and by implication, if not expressly, the vast multitudes
who hardly ever see the hills or the ocean must be without a religion.
The long poems which turn altogether upon scenery, perhaps in foreign
lands, and the passionate devotion to it which they breathe, may perhaps
do good in keeping alive in the hearts of men a determination to preserve
air, earth, and water from pollution; but speaking from experience as
a Londoner, I can testify that they are most depressing, and I would
counsel everybody whose position is what mine was to avoid these books
and to associate with those which will help him in his own circumstances.
Half of my occupation soon came to an end. One of my editors sent
me a petulant note telling me that all I wrote he could easily find
out himself, and that he required something more “graphic and
personal.” I could do no better, or rather I ought to say,
no worse than I had been doing. These letters were a great trouble
to me. I was always conscious of writing so much of which I was
not certain, and so much which was indifferent to me. The unfairness
of parties haunted me. But I continued to write, because I saw
no other way of getting a living, and surely it is a baser dishonesty
to depend upon the charity of friends because some pleasant, clean,
ideal employment has not presented itself, than to soil one’s
hands with a little of the inevitable mud. I don’t think
I ever felt anything more keenly than I did a sneer from an acquaintance
of mine who was in the habit of borrowing money from me. He was
a painter, whose pictures were never sold because he never worked hard
enough to know how to draw, and it came to my ears indirectly that he
had said that “he would rather live the life of a medieval ascetic
than condescend to the degradation of scribbling a dozen columns weekly
of utter trash on subjects with which he had no concern.”
At that very moment he owed me five pounds. God knows that I admitted
my dozen columns to be utter trash, but it ought to have been forgiven
by those who saw that I was struggling to save myself from the streets
and to keep a roof over my head. Degraded, however, as I might
be, I could not get down to the “graphic and personal,”
for it meant nothing less than the absolutely false. I therefore
contrived to exist on the one letter, which, excepting the mechanical
labour of writing a second, took up as much of my time as if I had to
write two.
Never, but once or twice at the most, did my labours meet with the slightest
recognition beyond payment. Once I remember that I accused a member
of a discreditable manoeuvre to consume the time of the House, and as
he represented a borough in my district, he wrote to the editor denying
the charge. The editor without any inquiry - and I believe I was
mistaken - instantly congratulated me on having “scored.”
At another time, when Parliament was not sitting, I ventured, by way
of filling up my allotted space, to say a word on behalf of a now utterly
forgotten novel. I had a letter from the authoress thanking me,
but alas! the illusion vanished. I was tempted by this one novel
to look into others which I found she had written, and I discovered
that they were altogether silly. The attraction of the one of
which I thought so highly, was due not to any real merit which it possessed,
but to something I had put into it. It was dead, but it had served
as a wall to re-echo my own voice. Excepting these two occasions,
I don’t think that one solitary human being ever applauded or
condemned one solitary word of which I was the author. All my
friends knew where my contributions were to be found, but I never heard
that they looked at them. They were never worth reading, and yet
such complete silence was rather lonely. The tradesman who makes
a good coat enjoys the satisfaction of having fitted and pleased his
customer, and a bricklayer, if he be diligent, is rewarded by knowing
that his master understands his value, but I never knew what it was
to receive a single response. I wrote for an abstraction; and
spoke to empty space. I cannot help claiming some pity and even
respect for the class to which I belonged. I have heard them called
all kinds of hard names, hacks, drudges, and something even more contemptible,
but the injustice done to them is monstrous. Their wage is hardly
earned; it is peculiarly precarious, depending altogether upon their
health, and no matter how ill they may be they must maintain the liveliness
of manner which is necessary to procure acceptance. I fell in
with one poor fellow whose line was something like my own. I became
acquainted with him through sitting side by side with him at the House.
He lived in lodgings in Goodge Street, and occasionally I walked with
him as far as the corner of Tottenham Court Road, where I caught the
last omnibus northward. He wrote like me a “descriptive
article” for the country, but he also wrote every now and then
- a dignity to which I never attained - a “special” for
London. His “descriptive articles” were more political
than mine, and he was obliged to be violently Tory. His creed,
however, was such a pure piece of professionalism, that though I was
Radical, and was expected to be so, we never jarred, and often, as we
wandered homewards, we exchanged notes, and were mutually useful, his
observations appearing in my paper, and mine in his, with proper modifications.
How he used to roar in the Gazette against the opposite party,
and yet I never heard anything from him myself but what was diffident
and tender. He had acquired, as an instrument necessary to him,
an extraordinarily extravagant style, and he laid about him with a bludgeon,
which inevitably descended on the heads of all prominent persons if
they happened not to be Conservative, no matter what their virtues might
be. One peculiarity, however, I noted in him. Although he
ought every now and then, when the subject was uppermost, to have flamed
out in the Gazette on behalf of the Church, I never saw a word
from him on that subject. He drew the line at religion.
He did not mind acting his part in things secular, for his performances
were, I am sure, mostly histrionic, but there he stopped. The
unreality of his character was a husk surrounding him, but it did not
touch the core. It was as if he had said to himself, “Political
controversy is nothing to me, and, what is more, is so uncertain that
it matters little whether I say yes or no, nor indeed does it matter
if I say yes and no, and I must keep my wife and children from
the workhouse; but when it comes to the relationship of man to God,
it is a different matter.” His altogether outside vehemence
and hypocrisy did in fact react upon him, and so far from affecting
harmfully what lay deeper, produced a more complete sincerity and transparency
extending even to the finest verbal distinctions. Over and over
again have I heard him preach to his wife, almost with pathos, the duty
of perfect exactitude in speech in describing the commonest occurrences.
“Now, my dear, is that so?” was a perpetual remonstrance
with him; and he always insisted upon it that there is no training more
necessary for children than that of teaching them not merely to speak
the truth in the ordinary, vulgar sense of the term, but to speak it
in a much higher sense, by rigidly compelling, point by point, a correspondence
of the words with the fact external or internal. He never would
tolerate in his own children a mere hackneyed, borrowed expression,
but demanded exact portraiture; and nothing vexed him more than to hear
one of them spoil and make worthless what he or she had seen, by reporting
it in some stale phrase which had been used by everybody. This
refusal to take the trouble to watch the presentment to the mind of
anything which had been placed before it, and to reproduce it in its
own lines and colours was, as he said, nothing but falsehood, and he
maintained that the principal reason why people are so uninteresting
is not that they have nothing to say. It is rather that they will
not face the labour of saying in their own tongue what they have to
say, but cover it up and conceal it in commonplace, so that we get,
not what they themselves behold and what they think, but a hieroglyphic
or symbol invented as the representative of a certain class of objects
or emotions, and as inefficient to represent a particular object or
emotion as x or y to set forth the relation of Hamlet
to Ophelia. He would even exercise his children in this art of
the higher truthfulness, and would purposely make them give him an account
of something which he had seen and they had seen, checking them the
moment he saw a lapse from originality. Such was the Tory correspondent
of the Gazette.
I ought to say, by way of apology for him, that in his day it signified
little or nothing whether Tory or Whig was in power. Politics
had not become what they will one day become, a matter of life or death,
dividing men with really private love and hate. What a mockery
controversy was in the House! How often I have seen members, who
were furious at one another across the floor, quietly shaking hands
outside, and inviting one another to dinner! I have heard them
say that we ought to congratulate ourselves that parliamentary differences
do not in this country breed personal animosities. To me this
seemed anything but a subject of congratulation. Men who are totally
at variance ought not to be friends, and if Radical and Tory are not
totally, but merely superficially at variance, so much the worse for
their Radicalism and Toryism.
It is possible, and even probable, that the public fury and the subsequent
amity were equally absurd. Most of us have no real loves and no
real hatreds. Blessed is love, less blessed is hatred, but thrice
accursed is that indifference which is neither one nor the other, the
muddy mess which men call friendship.
M’Kay - for that was his name - lived, as I have said, in Goodge
Street, where he had unfurnished apartments. I often spent part
of the Sunday with him, and I may forestall obvious criticism by saying
that I do not pretend for a moment to defend myself from inconsistency
in denouncing members of Parliament for their duplicity, M’Kay
and myself being also guilty of something very much like it. But
there was this difference between us and our parliamentary friends,
that we always divested ourselves of all hypocrisy when we were alone.
We then dropped the stage costume which members continued to wear in
the streets and at the dinner-table, and in which some of them even
slept and said their prayers.
London Sundays to persons who are not attached to any religious community,
and have no money to spend, are rather dreary. We tried several
ways of getting through the morning. If we heard that there was
a preacher with a reputation, we went to hear him. As a rule,
however, we got no good in that way. Once we came to a chapel
where there was a minister supposed to be one of the greatest orators
of the day. We had much difficulty in finding standing room.
Just as we entered we heard him say, “My friends, I appeal to
those of you who are parents. You know that if you say to a child
‘go,’ he goeth, and if you say ‘come,’ he cometh.
So the Lord” - But at this point M’Kay, who had children,
nudged me to come out; and out we went. Why does this little scene
remain with me? I can hardly say, but here it stands. It
is remembered, not so much by reason of the preacher as by reason of
the apparent acquiescence and admiration of the audience, who seemed
to be perfectly willing to take over an experience from their pastor
- if indeed it was really an experience - which was not their own.
Our usual haunts on Sunday were naturally the parks and Kensington Gardens;
but artificial limited enclosures are apt to become wearisome after
a time, and we longed for a little more freedom if a little less trim.
So we would stroll towards Hampstead or Highgate, the only drawback
to these regions being the squalid, ragged, half town, half suburb,
through which it was necessary to pass. The skirts of London when
the air is filled with north-easterly soot, grit, and filth, are cheerless,
and the least cheerful part of the scene is the inability of the vast
wandering masses of people to find any way of amusing themselves.
At the corner of one of the fields in Kentish Town, just about to be
devoured, stood a public-house, and opposite the door was generally
encamped a man who sold nothing but Brazil nuts. Swarms of people
lazily wandered past him, most of them waiting for the public-house
to open. Brazil nuts on a cold black Sunday morning are not exhilarating,
but the costermonger found many customers who bought his nuts, and ate
them, merely because they had nothing better to do. We went two
or three times to a freethinking hall, where we were entertained with
demonstrations of the immorality of the patriarchs and Jewish heroes,
and arguments to prove that the personal existence of the devil was
a myth, the audience breaking out into uproarious laughter at comical
delineations of Noah and Jonah. One morning we found the place
completely packed. A “celebrated Christian,” as he
was described to us, having heard of the hall, had volunteered to engage
in debate on the claims of the Old Testament to Divine authority.
He turned out to be a preacher whom we knew quite well. He was
introduced by his freethinking antagonist, who claimed for him a respectful
hearing. The preacher said that before beginning he should like
to “engage in prayer.” Accordingly he came to the
front of the platform, lifted up his eyes, told God why he was there,
and besought Him to bless the discussion in the conversion “of
these poor wandering souls, who have said in their hearts that there
is no God, to a saving faith in Him and in the blood of Christ.”
I expected that some resentment would be displayed when the wandering
souls found themselves treated like errant sheep, but to my surprise
they listened with perfect silence; and when he had said “Amen,”
there were great clappings of hands, and cries of “Bravo.”
They evidently considered the prayer merely as an elocutionary show-piece.
The preacher was much disconcerted, but he recovered himself, and began
his sermon, for it was nothing more. He enlarged on the fact that
men of the highest eminence had believed in the Old Testament.
Locke and Newton had believed in it, and did it not prove arrogance
in us to doubt when the “gigantic intellect which had swept the
skies, and had announced the law which bound the universe together was
satisfied?” The witness of the Old Testament to the New
was another argument, but his main reliance was upon the prophecies.
From Adam to Isaiah there was a continuous prefigurement of Christ.
Christ was the point to which everything tended; and “now, my
friends,” he said, “I cannot sit down without imploring
you to turn your eyes on Him who never yet repelled the sinner, to wash
in that eternal Fountain ever open for the remission of sins, and to
flee from the wrath to come. I believe the sacred symbol of the
cross has not yet lost its efficacy. For eighteen hundred years,
whenever it has been exhibited to the sons of men, it has been potent
to reclaim and save them. ‘I, if I be lifted up,’
cried the Great Sufferer, ‘will draw all men unto Me,’ and
He has drawn not merely the poor and ignorant but the philosopher and
the sage. Oh, my brethren, think what will happen if you reject
Him. I forbear to paint your doom. And think again, on the
other hand, of the bliss which awaits you if you receive Him, of the
eternal companionship with the Most High and with the spirits of just
men made perfect.” His hearers again applauded vigorously,
and none less so than their appointed leader, who was to follow on the
other side. He was a little man with small eyes; his shaven face
was dark with a black beard lurking under the skin, and his nose was
slightly turned up. He was evidently a trained debater who had
practised under railway arches, discussion “forums,” and
in the classes promoted by his sect. He began by saying that he
could not compliment his friend who had just sat down on the inducements
which he had offered them to become Christians. The New Cut was
not a nice place on a wet day, but he had rather sit at a stall there
all day long with his feet on a basket than lie in the bosom of some
of the just men made perfect portrayed in the Bible. Nor, being
married, should he feel particularly at ease if he had to leave his
wife with David. David certainly ought to have got beyond all
that kind of thing, considering it must be over 3000 years since he
first saw Bathsheba; but we are told that the saints are for ever young
in heaven, and this treacherous villain, who would have been tried by
a jury of twelve men and hung outside Newgate if he had lived in the
nineteenth century, might be dangerous now. He was an amorous
old gentleman up to the very last. (Roars of laughter.)
Nor did the speaker feel particularly anxious to be shut up with all
the bishops, who of course are amongst the elect, and on their departure
from this vale of tears tempered by ten thousand a year, are duly supplied
with wings. Much more followed in the same strain upon the immorality
of the Bible heroes, their cruelty, and the cruelty of the God who sanctioned
it. Then followed a clever exposition of the inconsistencies of
the Old Testament history, the impossibility of any reference to Jesus
therein, and a really earnest protest against the quibbling by which
those who believed in the Bible as a revelation sought to reconcile
it with science. “Finally,” said the speaker, “I
am sure we all of us will pass a vote of thanks to our reverend friend
for coming to see us, and we cordially invite him to come again.
If I might be allowed to offer a suggestion, it would be that he should
make himself acquainted with our case before he pays us another visit,
and not suppose that we are to be persuaded with the rhetoric which
may do very well for the young women of his congregation, but won’t
go down here.” This was fair and just, for the eminent Christian
was nothing but an ordinary minister, who, when he was prepared for
his profession, had never been allowed to see what are the historical
difficulties of Christianity, lest he should be overcome by them.
On the other hand, his sceptical opponents were almost devoid of the
faculty for appreciating the great remains of antiquity, and would probably
have considered the machinery of the Prometheus Bound or of the Iliad
a sufficient reason for a sneer. That they should spend their
time in picking the Bible to pieces when there was so much positive
work for them to do, seemed to me as melancholy as if they had spent
themselves upon theology. To waste a Sunday morning in ridiculing
such stories as that of Jonah was surely as imbecile as to waste it
in proving their verbal veracity.
CHAPTER II - M’KAY
It was foggy and overcast as we walked home to Goodge Street.
The churches and chapels were emptying themselves, but the great mass
of the population had been “nowhere.” I had dinner
with M’Kay, and as the day wore on the fog thickened. London
on a dark Sunday afternoon, more especially about Goodge Street, is
depressing. The inhabitants drag themselves hither and thither
in languor and uncertainty. Small mobs loiter at the doors of
the gin palaces. Costermongers wander aimlessly, calling “walnuts”
with a cry so melancholy that it sounds as the wail of the hopelessly
lost may be imagined to sound when their anguish has been deadened by
the monotony of a million years.
About two or three o’clock decent working men in their best clothes
emerge from the houses in such streets as Nassau Street. It is
part of their duty to go out after dinner on Sunday with the wife and
children. The husband pushes the perambulator out of the dingy
passage, and gazes doubtfully this way and that way, not knowing whither
to go, and evidently longing for the Monday, when his work, however
disagreeable it may be, will be his plain duty. The wife follows
carrying a child, and a boy and girl in unaccustomed apparel walk by
her side. They come out into Mortimer Street. There are
no shops open; the sky over their heads is mud, the earth is mud under
their feet, the muddy houses stretch in long rows, black, gaunt, uniform.
The little party reach Hyde Park, also wrapped in impenetrable mud-grey.
The man’s face brightens for a moment as he says, “It is
time to go back,” and so they return, without the interchange
of a word, unless perhaps they happen to see an omnibus horse fall down
on the greasy stones. What is there worth thought or speech on
such an expedition? Nothing! The tradesman who kept the
oil and colour establishment opposite to us was not to be tempted outside.
It was a little more comfortable than Nassau Street, and, moreover,
he was religious and did not encourage Sabbath-breaking. He and
his family always moved after their mid-day Sabbath repast from the
little back room behind the shop up to what they called the drawing-room
overhead. It was impossible to avoid seeing them every time we
went to the window. The father of the family, after his heavy
meal, invariably sat in the easy-chair with a handkerchief over his
eyes and slept. The children were always at the windows, pretending
to read books, but in reality watching the people below. At about
four o’clock their papa generally awoke, and demanded a succession
of hymn tunes played on the piano. When the weather permitted,
the lower sash was opened a little, and the neighbours were indulged
with the performance of “Vital Spark,” the father “coming
in” now and then with a bass note or two at the end where he was
tolerably certain of the harmony. At five o’clock a prophecy
of the incoming tea brought us some relief from the contemplation of
the landscape or brick-scape. I say “some relief,”
for meals at M’Kay’s were a little disagreeable. His
wife was an honest, good little woman, but so much attached to him and
so dependent on him that she was his mere echo. She had no opinions
which were not his, and whenever he said anything which went beyond
the ordinary affairs of the house, she listened with curious effort,
and generally responded by a weakened repetition of M’Kay’s
own observations. He perpetually, therefore, had before him an
enfeebled reflection of himself, and this much irritated him, notwithstanding
his love for her; for who could help loving a woman who, without the
least hesitation, would have opened her veins at his command, and have
given up every drop of blood in her body for him? Over and over
again I have heard him offer some criticism on a person or event, and
the customary chime of approval would ensue, provoking him to such a
degree that he would instantly contradict himself with much bitterness,
leaving poor Mrs. M’Kay in much perplexity. Such a shot
as this generally reduced her to timid silence. As a rule, he
always discouraged any topic at his house which was likely to serve
as an occasion for showing his wife’s dependence on him.
He designedly talked about her household affairs, asked her whether
she had mended his clothes and ordered the coals. She knew that
these things were not what was upon his mind, and she answered him in
despairing tones, which showed how much she felt the obtrusive condescension
to her level. I greatly pitied her, and sometimes, in fact, my
emotion at the sight of her struggles with her limitations almost overcame
me and I was obliged to get up and go. She was childishly affectionate.
If M’Kay came in and happened to go up to her and kiss her, her
face brightened into the sweetest and happiest smile. I recollect
once after he had been unusually annoyed with her he repented just as
he was leaving home, and put his lips to her head, holding it in both
his hands. I saw her gently take the hand from her forehead and
press it to her mouth, the tears falling down her cheek meanwhile.
Nothing would ever tempt her to admit anything against her husband.
M’Kay was violent and unjust at times. His occupation he
hated, and his restless repugnance to it frequently discharged itself
indifferently upon everything which came in his way. His children
often thought him almost barbarous, but in truth he did not actually
see them when he was in one of these moods. What was really present
with him, excluding everything else, was the sting of something more
than usually repulsive of which they knew nothing. Mrs. M’Kay’s
answer to her children’s remonstrances when they were alone with
her always was, “He is so worried,” and she invariably dwelt
upon their faults which had given him the opportunity for his wrath.
I think M’Kay’s treatment of her wholly wrong. I think
that he ought not to have imposed himself upon her so imperiously.
I think he ought to have striven to ascertain what lay concealed in
that modest heart, to have encouraged its expression and development,
to have debased himself before her that she might receive courage to
rise, and he would have found that she had something which he had not;
not his something perhaps, but something which would have made
his life happier. As it was, he stood upon his own ground above
her. If she could reach him, well and good, if not, the helping
hand was not proffered, and she fell back, hopeless. Later on
he discovered his mistake. She became ill very gradually, and
M’Kay began to see in the distance a prospect of losing her.
A frightful pit came in view. He became aware that he could not
do without her. He imagined what his home would have been with
other women whom he knew, and he confessed that with them he would have
been less contented. He acknowledged that he had been guilty of
a kind of criminal epicurism; that he rejected in foolish, fatal, nay,
even wicked indifference, the bread of life upon which he might have
lived and thriven. His whole effort now was to suppress himself
in his wife. He read to her, a thing he never did before, and
when she misunderstood, he patiently explained; he took her into his
counsels and asked her opinion; he abandoned his own opinion for hers,
and in the presence of her children he always deferred to her, and delighted
to acknowledge that she knew more than he did, that she was right and
he was wrong. She was now confined to her house, and the end was
near, but this was the most blessed time of her married life.
She grew under the soft rain of his loving care, and opened out, not,
indeed, into an oriental flower, rich in profound mystery of scent and
colour, but into a blossom of the chalk-down. Altogether concealed
and closed she would have remained if it had not been for this beneficent
and heavenly gift poured upon her. He had just time enough to
see what she really was, and then she died. There are some natures
that cannot unfold under pressure or in the presence of unregarding
power. Hers was one. They require a clear space round them,
the removal of everything which may overmaster them, and constant delicate
attention. They require too a recognition of the fact, which M’Kay
for a long time did not recognise, that it is folly to force them and
to demand of them that they shall be what they cannot be. I stood
by the grave this morning of my poor, pale, clinging little friend now
for some years at peace, and I thought that the tragedy of Promethean
torture or Christ-like crucifixion may indeed be tremendous, but there
is a tragedy too in the existence of a soul like hers, conscious of
its feebleness and ever striving to overpass it, ever aware that it
is an obstacle to the return of the affection of the man whom she loves.
Meals, as I have said, were disagreeable at M’Kay’s, and
when we wanted to talk we went out of doors. The evening after
our visit to the debating hall we moved towards Portland Place, and
walked up and down there for an hour or more. M’Kay had
a passionate desire to reform the world. The spectacle of the
misery of London, and of the distracted swaying hither and thither of
the multitudes who inhabit it, tormented him incessantly. He always
chafed at it, and he never seemed sure that he had a right to the enjoyment
of the simplest pleasures so long as London was before him. What
a farce, he would cry, is all this poetry, philosophy, art, and culture,
when millions of wretched mortals are doomed to the eternal darkness
and crime of the city! Here are the educated classes occupying
themselves with exquisite emotions, with speculations upon the Infinite,
with addresses to flowers, with the worship of waterfalls and flying
clouds, and with the incessant portraiture of a thousand moods and variations
of love, while their neighbours lie grovelling in the mire, and never
know anything more of life or its duties than is afforded them by a
police report in a bit of newspaper picked out of the kennel.
We went one evening to hear a great violin-player, who played such music,
and so exquisitely, that the limits of life were removed. But
we had to walk up the Haymarket home, between eleven and twelve o’clock,
and the violin-playing became the merest trifling. M’Kay
had been brought up upon the Bible. He had before him, not only
there, but in the history of all great religious movements, a record
of the improvement of the human race, or of large portions of it, not
merely by gradual civilisation, but by inspiration spreading itself
suddenly. He could not get it out of his head that something of
this kind is possible again in our time. He longed to try for
himself in his own poor way in one of the slums about Drury Lane.
I sympathised with him, but I asked him what he had to say. I
remember telling him that I had been into St. Paul’s Cathedral,
and that I pictured to myself the cathedral full, and myself in the
pulpit. I was excited while imagining the opportunity offered
me of delivering some message to three or four thousand persons in such
a building, but in a minute or two I discovered that my sermon would
be very nearly as follows: “Dear friends, I know no more than
you know; we had better go home.” I admitted to him that
if he could believe in hell-fire, or if he could proclaim the Second
Advent, as Paul did to the Thessalonians, and get people to believe,
he might change their manners, but otherwise he could do nothing but
resort to a much slower process. With the departure of a belief
in the supernatural departs once and for ever the chance of regenerating
the race except by the school and by science. {2}
However, M’Kay thought he would try. His earnestness was
rather a hindrance than a help to him, for it prevented his putting
certain important questions to himself, or at any rate it prevented
his waiting for distinct answers. He recurred to the apostles
and Bunyan, and was convinced that it was possible even now to touch
depraved men and women with an idea which should recast their lives.
So it is that the main obstacle to our success is a success which has
preceded us. We instinctively follow the antecedent form, and
consequently we either pass by, or deny altogether, the life of our
own time, because its expression has changed. We never do practically
believe that the Messiah is not incarnated twice in the same flesh.
He came as Jesus, and we look for Him as Jesus now, overlooking the
manifestation of to-day, and dying, perhaps, without recognising it.
M’Kay had found a room near Parker Street, Drury Lane, in which
he proposed to begin, and that night, as we trod the pavement of Portland
Place, he propounded his plans to me, I listening without much confidence,
but loth nevertheless to take the office of Time upon myself, and to
disprove what experience would disprove more effectually. His
object was nothing less than gradually to attract Drury Lane to come
and be saved.
The first Sunday I went with him to the room. As we walked over
the Drury Lane gratings of the cellars a most foul stench came up, and
one in particular I remember to this day. A man half dressed pushed
open a broken window beneath us, just as we passed by, and there issued
such a blast of corruption, made up of gases bred by filth, air breathed
and rebreathed a hundred times, charged with odours of unnameable personal
uncleanness and disease, that I staggered to the gutter with a qualm
which I could scarcely conquer. At the doors of the houses stood
grimy women with their arms folded and their hair disordered.
Grimier boys and girls had tied a rope to broken railings, and were
swinging on it. The common door to a score of lodgings stood ever
open, and the children swarmed up and down the stairs carrying with
them patches of mud every time they came in from the street. The
wholesome practice which amongst the decent poor marks off at least
one day in the week as a day on which there is to be a change; when
there is to be some attempt to procure order and cleanliness; a day
to be preceded by soap and water, by shaving, and by as many clean clothes
as can be procured, was unknown here. There was no break in the
uniformity of squalor; nor was it even possible for any single family
to emerge amidst such altogether suppressive surroundings. All
self-respect, all effort to do anything more than to satisfy somehow
the grossest wants, had departed. The shops were open; most of
them exhibiting a most miscellaneous collection of goods, such as bacon
cut in slices, fire-wood, a few loaves of bread, and sweetmeats in dirty
bottles. Fowls, strange to say, black as the flagstones, walked
in and out of these shops, or descended into the dark areas. The
undertaker had not put up his shutters. He had drawn down a yellow
blind, on which was painted a picture of a suburban cemetery.
Two funerals, the loftiest effort of his craft, were depicted approaching
the gates. When the gas was alight behind the blind, an effect
was produced which was doubtless much admired. He also displayed
in his window a model coffin, a work of art. It was about a foot
long, varnished, studded with little brass nails, and on the lid was
fastened a rustic cross stretching from end to end. The desire
to decorate existence in some way or other with more or less care is
nearly universal. The most sensual and the meanest almost always
manifest an indisposition to be content with mere material satisfaction.
I have known selfish, gluttonous, drunken men spend their leisure moments
in trimming a bed of scarlet geraniums, and the vulgarest and most commonplace
of mortals considers it a necessity to put a picture in the room or
an ornament on the mantelpiece. The instinct, even in its lowest
forms, is divine. It is the commentary on the text that man shall
not live by bread alone. It is evidence of an acknowledged compulsion
- of which art is the highest manifestation - to escape.
In the alleys behind Drury Lane this instinct, the very salt of life,
was dead, crushed out utterly, a symptom which seemed to me ominous,
and even awful to the last degree. The only house in which it
survived was in that of the undertaker, who displayed the willows, the
black horses, and the coffin. These may have been nothing more
than an advertisement, but from the care with which the cross was elaborated,
and the neatness with which it was made to resemble a natural piece
of wood, I am inclined to believe that the man felt some pleasure in
his work for its own sake, and that he was not utterly submerged.
The cross in such dens as these, or, worse than dens, in such sewers!
If it be anything, it is a symbol of victory, of power to triumph over
resistance, and even death. Here was nothing but sullen subjugation,
the most grovelling slavery, mitigated only by a tendency to mutiny.
Here was a strength of circumstance to quell and dominate which neither
Jesus nor Paul could have overcome - worse a thousandfold than Scribes
or Pharisees, or any form of persecution. The preaching of Jesus
would have been powerless here; in fact, no known stimulus, nothing
ever held up before men to stir the soul to activity, can do anything
in the back streets of great cities so long as they are the cesspools
which they are now.
We came to the room. About a score of M’Kay’s own
friends were there, and perhaps half-a-dozen outsiders, attracted by
the notice which had been pasted on a board at the entrance. M’Kay
announced his errand. The ignorance and misery of London he said
were intolerable to him. He could not take any pleasure in life
when he thought upon them. What could he do? that was the question.
He was not a man of wealth. He could not buy up these hovels.
He could not force an entrance into them and persuade their inhabitants
to improve themselves. He had no talents wherewith to found a
great organisation or create public opinion. He had determined,
after much thought, to do what he was now doing. It was very little,
but it was all he could undertake. He proposed to keep this room
open as a place to which those who wished might resort at different
times, and find some quietude, instruction, and what fortifying thoughts
he could collect to enable men to endure their almost unendurable sufferings.
He did not intend to teach theology. Anything which would be serviceable
he would set forth, but in the main he intended to rely on holding up
the examples of those who were greater than ourselves and were our redeemers.
He meant to teach Christ in the proper sense of the word. Christ
now is admired probably more than He had ever been. Everybody
agrees to admire Him, but where are the people who really do what He
did? There is no religion now-a-days. Religion is a mere
literature. Cultivated persons sit in their studies and write
overflowingly about Jesus, or meet at parties and talk about Him; but
He is not of much use to me unless I say to myself, how is it with
thee? unless I myself become what He was. This was the meaning
of Jesus to the Apostle Paul. Jesus was in him; he had put on
Jesus; that is to say, Jesus lived in him like a second soul, taking
the place of his own soul and directing him accordingly. That
was religion, and it is absurd to say that the English nation at this
moment, or any section of it, is religious. Its educated classes
are inhabited by a hundred minds. We are in a state of anarchy,
each of us with a different aim and shaping himself according to a different
type; while the uneducated classes are entirely given over to the “natural
man.” He was firmly persuaded that we need religion, poor
and rich alike. We need some controlling influence to bind together
our scattered energies. We do not know what we are doing.
We read one book one day and another book another day, but it is idle
wandering to right and left; it is not advancing on a straight road.
It is not possible to bind ourselves down to a certain defined course,
but still it is an enormous, an incalculable advantage for us to have
some irreversible standard set up in us by which everything we meet
is to be judged. That is the meaning of the prophecy - whether
it will ever be fulfilled God only knows - that Christ shall judge the
world. All religions have been this. They have said that
in the midst of the infinitely possible - infinitely possible evil and
infinitely possible good too - we become distracted. A thousand
forces good and bad act upon us. It is necessary, if we are to
be men, if we are to be saved, that we should be rescued from this tumult,
and that our feet should be planted upon a path. His object, therefore,
would be to preach Christ, as before said, and to introduce into human
life His unifying influence. He would try and get them to see
things with the eyes of Christ, to love with His love, to judge with
His judgment. He believed Christ was fitted to occupy this place.
He deliberately chose Christ as worthy to be our central, shaping force.
He would try by degrees to prove this; to prove that Christ’s
way of dealing with life is the best way, and so to create a genuinely
Christian spirit, which, when any choice of conduct is presented to
us, will prompt us to ask first of all, how would Christ have it?
or, when men and things pass before us, will decide through him what
we have to say about them. M’Kay added that he hoped his
efforts would not be confined to talking. He trusted to be able,
by means of this little meeting, gradually to gain admittance for himself
and his friends into the houses of the poor and do some practical good.
At present he had no organisation and no plans. He did not believe
in organisation and plans preceding a clear conception of what was to
be accomplished. Such, as nearly as I can now recollect, is an
outline of his discourse. It was thoroughly characteristic of
him. He always talked in this fashion. He was for ever insisting
on the aimlessness of modern life, on the powerlessness of its vague
activities to mould men into anything good, to restrain them from evil
or moderate their passions, and he was possessed by a vision of a new
Christianity which was to take the place of the old and dead theologies.
I have reported him in my own language. He strove as much as he
could to make his meaning plain to everybody. Just before he finished,
three or four out of the half-a-dozen outsiders who were present whistled
with all their might and ran down the stairs shouting to one another.
As we went out they had collected about the door, and amused themselves
by pushing one another against us, and kicking an old kettle behind
us and amongst us all the way up the street, so that we were covered
with splashes. Mrs. M’Kay went with us, and when we reached
home, she tried to say something about what she had heard. The
cloud came over her husband’s face at once; he remained silent
for a minute, and getting up and going to the window, observed that
it ought to be cleaned, and that he could hardly see the opposite house.
The poor woman looked distressed, and I was just about to come to her
rescue by continuing what she had been saying, when she rose, not in
anger, but in trouble, and went upstairs.
CHAPTER III - MISS LEROY
During the great French war there were many French prisoners in my native
town. They led a strange isolated life, for they knew nothing
of our language, nor, in those days, did three people in the town understand
theirs. The common soldiers amused themselves by making little
trifles and selling them. I have now before me a box of coloured
straw with the date 1799 on the bottom, which was bought by my grandfather.
One of these prisoners was an officer named Leroy. Why he did
not go back to France I never heard, but I know that before I was born
he was living near our house on a small income; that he tried to teach
French, and that he had as his companion a handsome daughter who grew
up speaking English. What she was like when she was young I cannot
say, but I have had her described to me over and over again. She
had rather darkish brown hair, and she was tall and straight as an arrow.
This she was, by the way, even into old age. She surprised, shocked,
and attracted all the sober persons in our circle. Her ways were
not their ways. She would walk out by herself on a starry night
without a single companion, and cause thereby infinite talk, which would
have converged to a single focus if it had not happened that she was
also in the habit of walking out at four o’clock on a summer’s
morning, and that in the church porch of a little village not far from
us, which was her favourite resting-place, a copy of the De Imitatione
Christi was found which belonged to her. So the talk was scattered
again and its convergence prevented. She used to say doubtful
things about love. One of them struck my mother with horror.
Miss Leroy told a male person once, and told him to his face, that if
she loved him and he loved her, and they agreed to sign one another’s
foreheads with a cross as a ceremony, it would be as good to her as
marriage. This may seem a trifle, but nobody now can imagine what
was thought of it at the time it was spoken. My mother repeated
it every now and then for fifty years. It may be conjectured how
easily any other girls of our acquaintance would have been classified,
and justly classified, if they had uttered such barefaced Continental
immorality. Miss Leroy’s neighbours were remarkably apt
at classifying their fellow-creatures. They had a few, a very
few holes, into which they dropped their neighbours, and they must go
into one or the other. Nothing was more distressing than a specimen
which, notwithstanding all the violence which might be used to it, would
not fit into a hole, but remained an exception. Some lout, I believe,
reckoning on the legitimacy of his generalisation, and having heard
of this and other observations accredited to Miss Leroy, ventured to
be slightly rude to her. What she said to him was never known,
but he was always shy afterwards of mentioning her name, and when he
did he was wont to declare that she was “a rum un.”
She was not particular, I have heard, about personal tidiness, and this
I can well believe, for she was certainly not distinguished when I knew
her for this virtue. She cared nothing for the linen-closet, the
spotless bed-hangings, and the bright poker, which were the true household
gods of the respectable women of those days. She would have been
instantly set down as “slut,” and as having “nasty
dirty forrin ways,” if a peculiar habit of hers had not unfortunately
presented itself, most irritating to her critics, so anxious promptly
to gratify their philosophic tendency towards scientific grouping.
Mrs. Mobbs, who lived next door to her, averred that she always slept
with the window open. Mrs. Mobbs, like everybody else, never opened
her window except to “air the room.” Mrs. Mobbs’
best bedroom was carpeted all over, and contained a great four-post
bedstead, hung round with heavy hangings, and protected at the top from
draughts by a kind of firmament of white dimity. Mrs. Mobbs stuffed
a sack of straw up the chimney of the fireplace, to prevent the fall
of the “sutt,” as she called it. Mrs. Mobbs, if she
had a visitor, gave her a hot supper, and expected her immediately afterwards
to go upstairs, draw the window curtains, get into this bed, draw the
bed curtains also, and wake up the next morning “bilious.”
This was the proper thing to do. Miss Leroy’s sitting-room
was decidedly disorderly; the chairs were dusty; “yer might write
yer name on the table,” Mrs. Mobbs declared; but, nevertheless,
the casement was never closed night nor day; and, moreover, Miss Leroy
was believed by the strongest circumstantial evidence to wash herself
all over every morning, a habit which Mrs. Mobbs thought “weakening,”
and somehow connected with ethical impropriety. When Miss Leroy
was married, and first as an elderly woman became known to me, she was
very inconsequential in her opinions, or at least appeared so to our
eyes. She must have been much more so when she was younger.
In our town we were all formed upon recognised patterns, and those who
possessed any one mark of the pattern, had all. The wine-merchant,
for example, who went to church, eminently respectable, Tory, by no
means associating with the tradesfolk who displayed their goods in the
windows, knowing no “experience,” and who had never felt
the outpouring of the Spirit, was a specimen of a class like him.
Another class was represented by the dissenting ironmonger, deacon,
presiding at prayer-meetings, strict Sabbatarian, and believer in eternal
punishments; while a third was set forth by “Guffy,” whose
real name was unknown, who got drunk, unloaded barges, assisted at the
municipal elections, and was never once seen inside a place of worship.
These patterns had existed amongst us from the dimmest antiquity, and
were accepted as part of the eternal order of things; so much so, that
the deacon, although he professed to be sure that nobody who had not
been converted would escape the fire - and the wine-merchant certainly
had not been converted - was very far from admitting to himself that
the wine-merchant ought to be converted, or that it would be proper
to try and convert him. I doubt, indeed, whether our congregation
would have been happy, or would have thought any the better of him,
if he had left the church. Such an event, however, could no more
come within the reach of our vision than a reversal of the current of
our river. It would have broken up our foundations and party-walls,
and would have been considered as ominous, and anything but a subject
for thankfulness. But Miss Leroy was not the wine-merchant, nor
the ironmonger, nor Guffy, and even now I cannot trace the hidden centre
of union from which sprang so much that was apparently irreconcilable.
She was a person whom nobody could have created in writing a novel,
because she was so inconsistent. As I have said before, she studied
Thomas à Kempis, and her little French Bible was brown with constant
use. But then she read much fiction in which there were scenes
which would have made our hair stand on end. The only thing she
constantly abhorred in books was what was dull and opaque. Yet,
as we shall see presently, her dislike to dulness, once at least in
her life, notably failed her. She was not Catholic, and professed
herself Protestant, but such a Protestantism! She had no sceptical
doubts. She believed implicitly that the Bible was the Word of
God, and that everything in it was true, but her interpretation of it
was of the strangest kind. Almost all our great doctrines seemed
shrunk to nothing in her eyes, while others, which were nothing to us,
were all-important to her. The atonement, for instance, I never
heard her mention, but Unitarianism was hateful to her, and Jesus was
her God in every sense of the word. On the other hand, she was
partly Pagan, for she knew very little of that consideration for the
feeble, and even for the foolish, which is the glory of Christianity.
She was rude to foolish people, and she instinctively kept out of the
way of all disease and weakness, so that in this respect she was far
below the commonplace tradesman’s wife, who visited the sick,
sat up with them, and, in fact, never seemed so completely in her element
as when she could be with anybody who was ill in bed.
Miss Leroy’s father was republican, and so was my grandfather.
My grandfather and old Leroy were the only people in our town who refused
to illuminate when a victory was gained over the French. Leroy’s
windows were spared on the ground that he was not a Briton, but the
mob endeavoured to show my grandfather the folly of his belief in democracy
by smashing every pane of glass in front of his house with stones.
This drew him and Leroy together, and the result was, that although
Leroy himself never set foot inside any chapel or church, Miss Leroy
was often induced to attend our meeting-house in company with a maiden
aunt of mine, who rather “took to her.” Now comes
the for ever mysterious passage in history. There was amongst
the attendants at that meeting-house a young man who was apprentice
to a miller. He was a big, soft, quiet, plump-faced, awkward youth,
very good, but nothing more. He wore on Sunday a complete suit
of light pepper-and-salt clothes, and continued to wear pepper-and-salt
on Sunday all his life. He taught in the Sunday-school, and afterwards,
as he got older, he was encouraged to open his lips at a prayer-meeting,
and to “take the service” in the village chapels on Sunday
evening. He was the most singularly placid, even-tempered person
I ever knew. I first became acquainted with him when I was a child
and he was past middle life. What he was then, I am told, he always
was; and I certainly never heard one single violent word escape his
lips. His habits, even when young, had a tendency to harden.
He went to sleep after his mid-day dinner with the greatest regularity,
and he never could keep awake if he sat by a fire after dark.
I have seen him, when kneeling at family worship and praying with his
family, lose himself for an instant and nod his head, to the confusion
of all who were around him. He is dead now, but he lived to a
good old age, which crept upon him gradually with no pain, and he passed
away from this world to the next in a peaceful doze. He never
read anything, for the simple reason that whenever he was not at work
or at chapel he slumbered. To the utter amazement of everybody,
it was announced one fine day that Miss Leroy and he - George Butts
- were to be married. They were about the last people in the world,
who, it was thought, could be brought together. My mother was
stunned, and never completely recovered. I have seen her, forty
years after George Butts’ wedding-day, lift up her hands, and
have heard her call out with emotion, as fresh as if the event were
of yesterday, “What made that girl have George I can not think
- but there!” What she meant by the last two words we could
not comprehend. Many of her acquaintances interpreted them to
mean that she knew more than she dared communicate, but I think they
were mistaken. I am quite certain if she had known anything she
must have told it, and, in the next place, the phrase “but there”
was not uncommon amongst women in our town, and was supposed to mark
the consciousness of a prudently restrained ability to give an explanation
of mysterious phenomena in human relationships. For my own part,
I am just as much in the dark as my mother. My father, who was
a shrewd man, was always puzzled, and could not read the riddle.
He used to say that he never thought George could have “made up”
to any young woman, and it was quite clear that Miss Leroy did not either
then or afterwards display any violent affection for him. I have
heard her criticise and patronise him as a “good soul,”
but incapable, as indeed he was, of all sympathy with her. After
marriage she went her way and he his. She got up early, as she
was wont to do, and took her Bible into the fields while he was snoring.
She would then very likely suffer from a terrible headache during the
rest of the day, and lie down for hours, letting the house manage itself
as best it could. What made her selection of George more obscure
was that she was much admired by many young fellows, some of whom were
certainly more akin to her than he was; and I have heard from one or
two reports of encouraging words, and even something more than words,
which she had vouchsafed to them. A solution is impossible.
The affinities, repulsions, reasons in a nature like that of Miss Leroy’s
are so secret and so subtle, working towards such incalculable and not-to-be-predicted
results, that to attempt to make a major and minor premiss and an inevitable
conclusion out of them would be useless. One thing was clear,
that by marrying George she gained great freedom. If she had married
anybody closer to her, she might have jarred with him; there might have
been collision and wreck as complete as if they had been entirely opposed;
for she was not the kind of person to accommodate herself to others
even in the matter of small differences. But George’s road
through space lay entirely apart from hers, and there was not the slightest
chance of interference. She was under the protection of a husband;
she could do things that, as an unmarried woman, especially in a foreign
land, she could not do, and the compensatory sacrifice to her was small.
This is really the only attempt at elucidation I can give. She
went regularly all her life to chapel with George, but even when he
became deacon, and “supplied” the villages round, she never
would join the church as a member. She never agreed with the minister,
and he never could make anything out of her. They did not quarrel,
but she thought nothing of his sermons, and he was perplexed and uncomfortable
in the presence of a nondescript who did not respond to any dogmatic
statement of the articles of religion, and who yet could not be put
aside as “one of those in the gallery” - that is to say,
as one of the ordinary unconverted, for she used to quote hymns with
amazing fervour, and she quoted them to him with a freedom and a certain
superiority which he might have expected from an aged brother minister,
but certainly not from one of his own congregation. He was a preacher
of the Gospel, it was true; and it was his duty, a duty on which he
insisted, to be “instant in season and out of season” in
saying spiritual things to his flock; but then they were things proper,
decent, conventional, uttered with gravity at suitable times - such
as were customary amongst all the ministers of the denomination.
It was not pleasant to be outbid in his own department, especially by
one who was not a communicant, and to be obliged, when he went on a
pastoral visit to a house in which Mrs. Butts happened to be, to sit
still and hear her, regardless of the minister’s presence, conclude
a short mystical monologue with Cowper’s verse -
“Exults our rising soul,
Disburdened of her load,
And swells unutterably full
Of glory and of God.”
This was not pleasant to our minister, nor was it pleasant to
the minister’s wife. But George Butts held a responsible
position in our community, and the minister’s wife held also a
responsible position, so that she taxed all her ingenuity to let her
friends understand at tea-parties what she thought of Mrs. Butts without
saying anything which could be the ground of formal remonstrance.
Thus did Mrs. Butts live among us, as an Arabian bird with its peculiar
habits, cries, and plumage might live in one of our barn-yards with
the ordinary barn-door fowls.
I was never happier when I was a boy than when I was with Mrs. Butts
at the mill, which George had inherited. There was a grand freedom
in her house. The front door leading into the garden was always
open. There was no precise separation between the house and the
mill. The business and the dwelling-place were mixed up together,
and covered with flour. Mr. Butts was in the habit of walking
out of his mill into the living-room every now and then, and never dreamed
when one o’clock came that it was necessary for him to change
his floury coat before he had his dinner. His cap he also often
retained, and in any weather, not extraordinarily cold, he sat in his
shirtsleeves. The garden was large and half-wild. A man
from the mill, if work was slack, gave a day to it now and then, but
it was not trimmed and raked and combed like the other gardens in the
town. It was full of gooseberry trees, and I was permitted to
eat the gooseberries without stint. The mill-life, too, was inexpressibly
attractive - the dark chamber with the great, green, dripping wheel
in it, so awfully mysterious as the central life of the whole structure;
the machinery connected with the wheel - I knew not how; the hole where
the roach lay by the side of the mill-tail in the eddy; the haunts of
the water-rats which we used to hunt with Spot, the black and tan terrier,
and the still more exciting sport with the ferrets - all this drew me
down the lane perpetually. I liked, and even loved Mrs. Butts,
too, for her own sake. Her kindness to me was unlimited, and she
was never overcome with the fear of “spoiling me,” which
seemed the constant dread of most of my hostesses. I never lost
my love for her. It grew as I grew, despite my mother’s
scarcely suppressed hostility to her, and when I heard she was ill,
and was likely to die, I went to be with her. She was eighty years
old then. I sat by her bedside with her hand in mine. I
was there when she passed away, and - but I have no mind and no power
to say any more, for all the memories of her affection and of the sunny
days by the water come over me and prevent the calmness necessary for
a chronicle. She with all her faults and eccentricities will always
have in my heart a little chapel with an ever-burning light. She
was one of the very very few whom I have ever seen who knew how to love
a child.
Mrs. Butts and George had one son who was named Clement. He was
exactly my own age, and naturally we were constant companions.
We went to the same school. He never distinguished himself at
his books, but he was chief among us. He had a versatile talent
for almost every accomplishment in which we delighted, but he was not
supreme in any one of them. There were better cricketers, better
football players, better hands at setting a night-line, better swimmers
than Clem, but he could do something, and do it well, in all these departments.
He generally took up a thing with much eagerness for a time, and then
let it drop. He was foremost in introducing new games and new
fashions, which he permitted to flourish for a time, and then superseded.
As he grew up he displayed a taste for drawing and music. He was
soon able to copy little paintings of flowers, or even little country
scenes, and to play a piece of no very great difficulty with tolerable
effect. But as he never was taught by a master, and never practised
elementary exercises and studies, he was deficient in accuracy.
When the question came what was to be done with him after he left school,
his father naturally wished him to go into the mill. Clem, however,
set his face steadily against this project, and his mother, who was
a believer in his genius, supported him. He actually wanted to
go to the University, a thing unheard of in those days amongst our people;
but this was not possible, and after dangling about for some time at
home, he obtained the post of usher in a school, an occupation which
he considered more congenial and intellectual than that of grinding
flour. Strange to say, although he knew less than any of his colleagues,
he succeeded better than any of them. He managed to impress a
sense of his own importance upon everybody, including the headmaster.
He slid into a position of superiority. above three or four colleagues
who would have shamed him at an examination, and who uttered many a
curse because they saw themselves surpassed and put in the shade by
a stranger, who, they were confident, could hardly construct a hexameter.
He never quarrelled with them nor did he grossly patronise them, but
he always let them know that he considered himself above them.
His reading was desultory; in fact, everything he did was desultory.
He was not selfish in the ordinary sense of the word. Rather was
he distinguished by a large and liberal open-handedness; but he was
liberal also to himself to a remarkable degree, dressing himself expensively,
and spending a good deal of money in luxuries. He was specially
fond of insisting on his half French origin, made a great deal of his
mother, was silent as to his father, and always signed himself C. Leroy
Butts, although I don’t believe the second Christian name was
given him in baptism. Notwithstanding his generosity he was egotistical
and hollow at heart. He knew nothing of friendship in the best
sense of the word, but had a multitude of acquaintances, whom he invariably
sought amongst those who were better off than himself. He was
popular with them, for no man knew better than he how to get up an entertainment,
or to make a success of an evening party. He had not been at his
school for two years before he conceived the notion of setting up for
himself. He had not a penny, but he borrowed easily what was wanted
from somebody he knew, and in a twelvemonth more he had a dozen pupils.
He took care to get the ablest subordinates he could find, and he succeeded
in passing a boy for an open scholarship at Oxford, against two competitors
prepared by the very man whom he had formerly served. After this
he prospered greatly, and would have prospered still more, if his love
of show and extravagance had not increased with his income. His
talents were sometimes taxed when people who came to place their sons
with him supposed ignorantly that his origin and attainments were what
might be expected from his position; and poor Chalmers, a Glasgow M.A.,
who still taught, for £80 a year, the third class in the establishment
in which Butts began life, had some bitter stories on that subject.
Chalmers was a perfect scholar, but he was not agreeable. He had
black finger-nails, and wore dirty collars. Having a lively remembrance
of his friend’s “general acquaintance” with Latin
prosody, Chalmers’ opinion of Providence was much modified when
he discovered what Providence was doing for Butts. Clem took to
the Church when he started for himself. It would have been madness
in him to remain a Dissenter. But in private, if it suited his
purpose, he could always be airily sceptical, and he had a superficial
acquaintance, second-hand, with a multitude of books, many of them of
an infidel turn. I once rebuked him for his hypocrisy, and his
defence was that religious disputes were indifferent to him, and that
at any rate a man associates with gentlemen if he is a churchman.
Cultivation and manners he thought to be of more importance than Calvinism.
I believe that he partly meant what he said. He went to church
because the school would have failed if he had gone to chapel; but he
was sufficiently keen-sighted and clever to be beyond the petty quarrels
of the sects, and a song well sung was of much greater moment to him
than an essay on pædo-baptism. It was all very well of Chalmers
to revile him for his shallowness. He was shallow, and yet he
possessed in some mysterious way a talent which I greatly coveted, and
which in this world is inestimably precious - the talent of making people
give way before him - a capacity of self-impression. Chalmers
could never have commanded anybody. He had no power whatever,
even when he was right, to put his will against the wills of others,
but yielded first this way and then the other. Clem, on the contrary,
without any difficulty or any effort, could conquer all opposition,
and smilingly force everybody to do his bidding.
Clem had a peculiar theory with regard to his own rights and those of
the class to which he considered that he belonged. He always held
implicitly and sometimes explicitly that gifted people live under a
kind of dispensation of grace; the law existing solely for dull souls.
What in a clown is a crime punishable by the laws of the land might
in a man of genius be a necessary development, or at any rate an excusable
offence. He had nothing to say for the servant-girl who had sinned
with the shopman, but if artist or poet were to carry off another man’s
wife, it might not be wrong.
He believed, and acted upon the belief, that the inferior ought to render
perpetual incense to the superior, and that the superior should receive
it as a matter of course. When his father was ill he never waited
on him or sat up a single night with him. If duty was disagreeable
to him Clem paid homage to it afar off, but pleaded exemption.
He admitted that waiting on the sick is obligatory on people who are
fitted for it, and is very charming. Nothing was more beautiful
to him than tender, filial care spending itself for a beloved object.
But it was not his vocation. His nerves were more finely ordered
than those of mankind generally, and the sight of disease and suffering
distressed him too much. Everything was surrendered to him in
the houses of his friends. If any inconvenience was to be endured,
he was the first person to be protected from it, and he accepted the
greatest sacrifices, with a graceful acknowledgment, it is true, but
with no repulse. To what better purpose could the best wine be
put than in cherishing his imagination. It was simple waste to
allow it to be poured out upon the earth, and to give it to a fool was
no better. After he succeeded so well in the world, Clem, to a
great extent, deserted me, although I was his oldest friend and the
friend of his childhood. I heard that he visited a good many rich
persons, that he made much of them, and they made much of him.
He kept up a kind of acquaintance with me, not by writing to me, but
by the very cheap mode of sending me a newspaper now and then with a
marked paragraph in it announcing the exploits of his school at a cricket-match,
or occasionally with a report of a lecture which he had delivered.
He was a decent orator, and from motives of business if from no other,
he not unfrequently spoke in public. One or two of these lectures
wounded me a good deal. There was one in particular on As You
Like It, in which he held up to admiration the fidelity which is
so remarkable in Shakespeare, and lamented that in these days it was
so rare to find anything of the kind, he thought that we were becoming
more indifferent to one another. He maintained, however, that
man should be everything to man, and he then enlarged on the duty of
really cultivating affection, of its superiority to books, and on the
pleasure and profit of self-denial. I do not mean to accuse Clem
of downright hypocrisy. I have known many persons come up from
the country and go into raptures over a playhouse sun and moon who have
never bestowed a glance or a thought on the real sun and moon to be
seen from their own doors; and we are all aware it by no means follows
because we are moved to our very depths by the spectacle of unrecognised,
uncomplaining endurance in a novel, that therefore we can step over
the road to waste an hour or a sixpence upon the unrecognised, uncomplaining
endurance of the poor lone woman left a widow in the little villa there.
I was annoyed with myself because Clem’s abandonment of me so
much affected me. I wished I could cut the rope and carelessly
cast him adrift as he had cast me adrift, but I could not. I never
could make out and cannot make out what was the secret of his influence
over me; why I was unable to say, “If you do not care for me I
do not care for you.” I longed sometimes for complete rupture,
so that we might know exactly where we were, but it never came.
Gradually our intercourse grew thinner and thinner, until at last I
heard that he had been spending a fortnight with some semi-aristocratic
acquaintance within five miles of me, and during the whole of that time
he never came near me. I met him in a railway station soon afterwards,
when he came up to me effusive and apparently affectionate. “It
was a real grief to me, my dear fellow,” he said, “that
I could not call on you last month, but the truth was I was so driven:
they would make me go here and go there, and I kept putting off my visit
to you till it was too late.” Fortunately my train was just
starting, or I don’t know what might have happened. I said
not a word; shook hands with him; got into the carriage; he waved his
hat to me, and I pretended not to see him, but I did see him, and saw
him turn round immediately to some well-dressed officer-like gentleman
with whom he walked laughing down the platform. The rest of that
day was black to me. I cared for nothing. I passed away
from the thought of Clem, and dwelt upon the conviction which had long
possessed me that I was insignificant, that there was nothing
much in me, and it was this which destroyed my peace. We may
reconcile ourselves to poverty and suffering, but few of us can endure
the conviction that there is nothing in us, and that consequently
we cannot expect anybody to gravitate towards us with any forceful impulse.
It is a bitter experience. And yet there is consolation.
The universe is infinite. In the presence of its celestial magnitudes
who is there who is really great or small, and what is the difference
between you and me, my work and yours? I sought refuge in the
idea of GOD, the God of a starry night with its incomprehensible distances;
and I was at peace, content to be the meanest worm of all the millions
that crawl on the earth.
CHAPTER IV - A NECESSARY DEVELOPMENT
The few friends who have read the first part of my autobiography may
perhaps remember that in my younger days I had engaged myself to a girl
named Ellen, from whom afterwards I parted. After some two or
three years she was left an orphan, and came into the possession of
a small property, over which unfortunately she had complete power.
She was attractive and well-educated, and I heard long after I had broken
with her, and had ceased to have intercourse with Butts, that the two
were married. He of course, living so near her, had known her
well, and he found her money useful. How they agreed I knew not
save by report, but I was told that after the first child was born,
the only child they ever had, Butts grew indifferent to her, and that
she, to use my friend’s expression, “went off,” by
which I suppose he meant that she faded. There happened in those
days to live near Butts a small squire, married, but with no family.
He was a lethargic creature, about five-and-thirty years old, farming
eight hundred acres of his own land. He did not, however, belong
to the farming class. He had been to Harrow, was on the magistrates’
bench, and associated with the small aristocracy of the country round.
He was like every other squire whom I remember in my native county,
and I can remember scores of them. He read no books and tolerated
the usual conventional breaches of the moral law, but was an intense
worshipper of respectability, and hated a scandal. On one point
he differed from his neighbours. He was a Whig and they were all
Tories. I have said he read no books, and this, on the whole,
is true, but nevertheless he did know something about the history of
the early part of the century, and he was rather fond at political gatherings
of making some allusion to Mr. Fox. His father had sat in the
House of Commons when Fox was there, and had sternly opposed the French
war. I don’t suppose that anybody not actually in it
- no Londoner certainly - can understand the rigidity of the bonds which
restricted county society when I was young, and for aught I know may
restrict it now. There was with us one huge and dark exception
to the general uniformity. The earl had broken loose, had ruined
his estate, had defied decorum and openly lived with strange women at
home and in Paris, but this black background did but set off the otherwise
universal adhesion to the Church and to authorised manners, an adhesion
tempered and rendered tolerable by port wine. It must not, however,
be supposed that human nature was different from the human nature of
to-day or a thousand years ago. There were then, even as there
were a thousand years ago, and are to-day, small, secret doors, connected
with mysterious staircases, by which access was gained to freedom; and
men and women, inmates of castles with walls a yard thick, and impenetrable
portcullises, sought those doors and descended those stairs night and
day. But nobody knew, or if we did know, the silence was profound.
The broad-shouldered, yellow-haired Whig squire, had a wife who was
the opposite of him. She came from a distant part of the country,
and had been educated in France. She was small, with black hair,
and yet with blue eyes. She spoke French perfectly, was devoted
to music, read French books, and, although she was a constant attendant
at church, and gave no opportunity whatever for the slightest suspicion,
the matrons of the circle in which she moved were never quite happy
about her. This was due partly to her knowledge of French, and
partly to her having no children. Anything more about her I do
not know. She was beyond us, and although I have seen her often
enough I never spoke to her. Butts, however, managed to become
a visitor at the squire’s house. Fancy my going to
the squire’s! But Butts did, was accepted there, and even
dined there with a parson, and two or three half-pay officers.
The squire never called on Butts. That was an understood thing,
nor did Mrs. Butts accompany her husband. That also was an understood
thing. It was strange that Butts could tolerate and even court
such a relationship. Most men would scorn with the scorn of a
personal insult an invitation to a house from which their wives were
expressly excluded. The squire’s lady and Clem became great
friends. She discovered that his mother was a Frenchwoman, and
this was a bond between them. She discovered also that Clem was
artistic, that he was devotedly fond of music, that he could draw a
little, paint a little, and she believed in the divine right of talent
wherever it might be found to assert a claim of equality with those
who were better born. The women in the country-side were shy of
her; for the men she could not possibly care, and no doubt she must
at times have got rather weary of her heavy husband with his one outlook
towards the universal in the person of George James Fox, and the Whig
policy of 1802. I am under some disadvantage in telling this part
of my story, because I was far away from home, and only knew afterwards
at second hand what the course of events had been; but I learned them
from one who was intimately concerned, and I do not think I can be mistaken
on any essential point. I imagine that by this time Mrs. Butts
must have become changed into what she was in later years. She
had grown older since she and I had parted; she had seen trouble; her
child had been born, and although she was not exactly estranged from
Clem, for neither he nor she would have admitted any coolness, she had
learned that she was nothing specially to him. I have often noticed
what an imperceptible touch, what a slight shifting in the balance of
opposing forces, will alter the character. I have observed a woman,
for example, essentially the same at twenty and thirty - who is there
who is not always essentially the same? - and yet, what was a defect
at twenty, has become transformed and transfigured into a benignant
virtue at thirty; translating the whole nature from the human to the
divine. Some slight depression has been wrought here, and some
slight lift has been given there, and beauty and order have miraculously
emerged from what was chaotic. The same thing may continually
be noticed in the hereditary transmission of qualities. The redeeming
virtue of the father palpably present in the son becomes his curse,
through a faint diminution of the strength of the check which caused
that virtue to be the father’s salvation. The propensity,
too, which is a man’s evil genius, and leads him to madness and
utter ruin, gives vivid reality to all his words and thoughts, and becomes
all his strength, if by divine assistance it can just be subdued and
prevented from rising in victorious insurrection. But this is
a digression, useful, however, in its way, because it will explain Mrs.
Butts when we come a little nearer to her in the future.
For a time Clem’s visits to the squire’s house always took
place when the squire was at home, but an amateur concert was to be
arranged in which Clem was to take part together with the squire’s
lady. Clem consequently was obliged to go to the Hall for the
purpose of practising, and so it came to pass that he was there at unusual
hours and when the master was afield. These morning and afternoon
calls did not cease when the concert was over. Clem’s wife
did not know anything about them, and, if she noticed his frequent absence,
she was met with an excuse. Perhaps the worst, or almost the worst
effect of relationships which we do not like to acknowledge, is the
secrecy and equivocation which they beget. From the very first
moment when the intimacy between the squire’s wife and Clem began
to be anything more than harmless, he was compelled to shuffle and to
become contemptible. At the same time I believe he defended himself
against himself with the weapons which were ever ready when self rose
against self because of some wrong-doing. He was not as other
men. It was absurd to class what he did with what an ordinary
person might do, although externally his actions and those of the ordinary
person might resemble one another. I cannot trace the steps by
which the two sinners drew nearer and nearer together, for the simple
reason that this is an autobiography, and not a novel. I do not
know what the development was, nor did anybody except the person concerned.
Neither do I know what was the mental history of Mrs. Butts during this
unhappy period. She seldom talked about it afterwards. I
do, however, happen to recollect hearing her once say that her greatest
trouble was the cessation, from some unknown cause, of Clem’s
attempts - they were never many - to interest and amuse her. It
is easy to understand how this should be. If a man is guilty of
any defection from himself, of anything of which he is ashamed, everything
which is better becomes a farce to him. After he has been betrayed
by some passion, how can he pretend to the perfect enjoyment of what
is pure? The moment he feels any disposition to rise, he is stricken
through as if with an arrow, and he drops. Not until weeks, months,
and even years have elapsed, does he feel justified in surrendering
himself to a noble emotion. I have heard of persons who have been
able to ascend easily and instantaneously from the mud to the upper
air, and descend as easily; but to me at least they are incomprehensible.
Clem, less than most men, suffered permanently, or indeed in any way
from remorse, because he was so shielded by his peculiar philosophy;
but I can quite believe that when he got into the habit of calling at
the Hall at mid-day, his behaviour to his wife changed.
One day in December the squire had gone out with the hounds. Clem,
going on from bad to worse, had now reached the point of planning to
be at the Hall when the squire was not at home. On that particular
afternoon Clem was there. It was about half-past four o’clock,
and the master was not expected till six. There had been some
music, the lady accompanying, and Clem singing. It was over, and
Clem, sitting down beside her at the piano, and pointing out with his
right hand some passage which had troubled him, had placed his left
arm on her shoulder, and round her neck, she not resisting. He
always swore afterwards that never till then had such a familiarity
as this been permitted, and I believe that he did not tell a lie.
But what was there in that familiarity? The worst was already
there, and it was through a mere accident that it never showed itself.
The accident was this. The squire, for some unknown reason, had
returned earlier than usual, and dismounting in the stable-yard, had
walked round the garden on the turf which came close to the windows
of the ground floor. Passing the drawing-room window, and looking
in by the edge of the drawn-down blind, he saw his wife and Clem just
at the moment described. He slipped round to the door, took off
his boots so that he might not be heard, and as there was a large screen
inside the room he was able to enter it unobserved. Clem caught
sight of him just as he emerged from behind the screen, and started
up instantly in great confusion, the lady, with greater presence of
mind, remaining perfectly still. Without a word the squire strode
up to Clem, struck out at him, caught him just over the temple, and
felled him instantaneously. He lay for some time senseless, and
what passed between husband and wife I cannot say. After about
ten minutes, perhaps, Clem came to himself; there was nobody to be seen;
and he managed to get up and crawl home. He told his wife he had
met with an accident; that he would go to bed, and that she should know
all about it when he was better. His forehead was dressed, and
to bed he went. That night Mrs. Butts had a letter. It ran
as follows:-
“MADAM, - It may at first sight seem a harsh thing for me to write
and tell you what I have to say, but I can assure you I do not mean
to be anything but kind to you, and I think it will be better, for reasons
which I will afterwards explain, that I should communicate with you
rather than with your husband. For some time past I have suspected
that he was too fond of my wife, and last night I caught him with his
arms round her neck. In a moment of not unjustifiable anger I
knocked him down. I have not the honour of knowing you personally,
but from what I have heard of you I am sure that he has not the slightest
reason for playing with other women. A man who will do what he
has done will be very likely to conceal from you the true cause of his
disaster, and if you know the cause you may perhaps be able to reclaim
him. If he has any sense of honour left in him, and of what is
due to you, he will seek your pardon for his baseness, and you will
have a hold on him afterwards which you would not have if you were in
ignorance of what has happened. For him I do not care a straw,
but for you I feel deeply, and I believe that my frankness with you,
although it may cause you much suffering now, will save you more hereafter.
I have only one condition to make. Mr. Butts must leave this place,
and never let me see his face again. He has ruined my peace.
Nothing will be published through me, for, as far as I can prevent it,
I will have no public exposure. If Mr. Butts were to remain here
it would be dangerous for us to meet, and probably everything, by some
chance, would become common property. - Believe me to be, Madam, with
many assurances of respect, truly yours, - .”
I cannot distinguish the precise proportion of cruelty in this letter.
Did the writer designedly torture Butts by telling his wife, or did
he really think that she would in the end be happier because Butts would
not have a secret reserved from her, - a temptation to lying - and because
with this secret in her possession, he might perhaps be restrained in
future? Nobody knows. All we know is that there are very
few human actions of which it can be said that this or that taken by
itself produced them. With our inborn tendency to abstract, to
separate mentally the concrete into factors which do not exist separately,
we are always disposed to assign causes which are too simple, and which,
in fact, have no being in rerum natura. Nothing in nature
is propelled or impeded by one force acting alone. There is no
such thing, save in the brain of the mathematician. I see no reason
why even motives diametrically opposite should not unite in one resulting
deed, and think it very probable that the squire was both cruel and
merciful to the same person in the letter; influenced by exactly conflicting
passions, whose conflict ended so.
As to the squire and his wife, they lived together just as before.
I do not think, that, excepting the four persons concerned, anybody
ever heard a syllable about the affair, save myself a long while afterwards.
Clem, however, packed up and left the town, after selling his business.
He had a reputation for restlessness; and his departure, although it
was sudden, was no surprise. He betook himself to Australia, his
wife going with him. I heard that they had gone, and heard also
that he was tired of school-keeping in England, and had determined to
try his fortune in another part of the world. Our friendship had
dwindled to nothing, and I thought no more about him. Mrs. Butts
never uttered one word of reproach to her husband. I cannot say
that she loved him as she could have loved, but she had accepted him,
and she said to herself that as perhaps it was through her lack of sympathy
with him that he had strayed, it was her duty more and more to draw
him to herself. She had a divine disposition, not infrequent amongst
women, to seek in herself the reason for any wrong which was done to
her. That almost instinctive tendency in men, to excuse, to transfer
blame to others, to be angry with somebody else when they suffer from
the consequences of their own misdeeds, in her did not exist.
During almost the whole of her married life, before this affair between
the squire and Clem, Mrs. Butts had had much trouble, although her trouble
was, perhaps, rather the absence of joy than the presence of any poignant
grief. She was much by herself. She had never been a great
reader, but in her frequent solitude she was forced to do something
in order to obtain relief, and she naturally turned to the Bible.
It would be foolish to say that the Bible alone was to be credited with
the support she received. It may only have been the occasion for
a revelation of the strength that was in her. Reading, however,
under such circumstances, is likely to be peculiarly profitable.
It is never so profitable as when it is undertaken in order that a positive
need may be satisfied or an inquiry answered. She discovered in
the Bible much that persons to whom it is a mere literature would never
find. The water of life was not merely admirable to the eye; she
drank it, and knew what a property it possessed for quenching thirst.
No doubt the thought of a heaven hereafter was especially consolatory.
She was able to endure, and even to be happy because the vision of lengthening
sorrow was bounded by a better world beyond. “A very poor,
barbarous gospel,” thinks the philosopher who rests on his Marcus
Antoninus and Epictetus. I do not mean to say, that in the shape
in which she believed this doctrine, it was not poor and barbarous,
but yet we all of us, whatever our creed may be, must lay hold at times
for salvation upon something like it. Those who have been plunged
up to the very lips in affliction know its necessity. To such
as these it is idle work for the prosperous and the comfortable to preach
satisfaction with the life that now is. There are seasons when
it is our sole resource to recollect that in a few short years we shall
be at rest. While upon this subject I may say, too, that some
injustice has been done to the Christian creed of immortality as an
influence in determining men’s conduct. Paul preached the
imminent advent of Christ and besought his disciples, therefore, to
watch, and we ask ourselves what is the moral value to us of such an
admonition. But surely if we are to have any reasons for being
virtuous, this is as good as any other. It is just as respectable
to believe that we ought to abstain from iniquity because Christ is
at hand, and we expect to meet Him, as to abstain from it because by
our abstention we shall be healthier or more prosperous. Paul
had a dream - an absurd dream let us call it - of an immediate millennium,
and of the return of his Master surrounded with divine splendour, judging
mankind and adjusting the balance between good and evil. It was
a baseless dream, and the enlightened may call it ridiculous.
It is anything but that, it is the very opposite of that. Putting
aside its temporary mode of expression, it is the hope and the prophecy
of all noble hearts, a sign of their inability to concur in the present
condition of things.
Going back to Clem’s wife; she laid hold, as I have said, upon
heaven. The thought wrought in her something more than forgetfulness
of pain or the expectation of counterpoising bliss. We can understand
what this something was, for although we know no such heaven as hers,
a new temper is imparted to us, a new spirit breathed into us; I was
about to say a new hope bestowed upon us, when we consider that we live
surrounded by the soundless depths in which the stars repose.
Such a consideration has a direct practical effect upon us, and so had
the future upon the mind of Mrs. Butts. “Why dost thou judge
thy brother,” says Paul, “for we shall all stand before
the judgment-seat of God.” Paul does not mean that God will
punish him and that we may rest satisfied that our enemy will be turned
into hell fire. Rather does he mean, what we, too, feel, that,
reflecting on the great idea of God, and upon all that it involves,
our animosities are softened, and our heat against our brother is cooled.
One or two reflections may perhaps be permitted here on this passage
in Mrs. Butts’ history.
The fidelity of Clem’s wife to him, if not entirely due to the
New Testament, was in a great measure traceable to it. She had
learned from the Epistle to the Corinthians that charity beareth all
things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things;
and she interpreted this to mean, not merely charity to those whom she
loved by nature, but charity to those with whom she was not in sympathy,
and who even wronged her. Christianity no doubt does teach such
a charity as this, a love which is to be: independent of mere personal
likes and dislikes, a love of the human in man. The natural man,
the man of this century, uncontrolled by Christianity, considers himself
a model of what is virtuous and heroic if he really loves his friends,
and he permits all kinds of savage antipathies to those of his fellow
creatures with whom he is not in harmony. Jesus on the other hand
asks with His usual perfect simplicity, “If ye love them which
love you, what reward have ye? Do not even the publicans the same?”
It would be a great step in advance for most of us to love anybody,
and the publicans of the time of Jesus must have been a much more Christian
set than most Christians of the present day; but that we should love
those who do not love us is a height never scaled now, except by a few
of the elect in whom Christ still survives. In the gospel of Luke,
also, Mrs. Butts read that she was to hope for nothing again from her
love, and that she was to be merciful, as her Father in heaven is merciful.
That is really the expression of the idea in morality, and incalculable
is the blessing that our great religious teacher should have been bold
enough to teach the idea, and not any limitation of it. He always
taught it, the inward born, the heavenly law towards which everything
strives. He always trusted it; He did not deal in exceptions;
He relied on it to the uttermost, never despairing. This has always
seemed to me to be the real meaning of the word faith. It is permanent
confidence in the idea, a confidence never to be broken down by apparent
failure, or by examples by which ordinary people prove that qualification
is necessary. It was precisely because Jesus taught the idea,
and nothing below it, that He had such authority over a soul like my
friend’s, and the effect produced by Him could not have been produced
by anybody nearer to ordinary humanity.
It must be admitted, too, that the Calvinism of those days had a powerful
influence in enabling men and women to endure, although I object to
giving the name of Calvin to a philosophy which is a necessity in all
ages. “Are not two sparrows sold for a farthing? and one
of them shall not fall on the ground without your Father.”
This is the last word which can be said. Nothing can go beyond
it, and at times it is the only ground which we feel does not shake
under our feet. All life is summed up, and due account is taken
of it, according to its degree. Mrs. Butts’ Calvinism, however,
hardly took the usual dogmatic form. She was too simple to penetrate
the depths of metaphysical theology, and she never would have dared
to set down any of her fellow creatures as irrevocably lost. She
adapted the Calvinistic creed to something which suited her. For
example, she fully understood what St. Paul means when he tells the
Thessalonians that because they were called, therefore they
were to stand fast. She thought with Paul that being called; having
a duty plainly laid upon her; being bidden as if by a general to do
something, she ought to stand fast; and she stood fast, supported
against all pressure by the consciousness of fulfilling the special
orders of One who was her superior. There is no doubt that this
dogma of a personal calling is a great consolation, and it is a great
truth. Looking at the masses of humanity, driven this way and
that way, the Christian teaching is apt to be forgotten that for each
individual soul there is a vocation as real as if that soul were alone
upon the planet. Yet it is a fact. We are blinded to it
and can hardly believe it, because of the impotency of our little intellects
to conceive a destiny which shall take care of every atom of life on
the globe: we are compelled to think that in such vast crowds of people
as we behold, individuals must elude the eye of the Maker, and be swept
into forgetfulness. But the truth of truths is that the mind of
the universe is not our mind, or at any rate controlled by our limitations.
This has been a long digression which I did not intend; but I could
not help it. I was anxious to show how Mrs. Butts met her trouble
through her religion. The apostle says that “they drank
of that spiritual Rock which followed them, and that Rock was Christ.”
That was true of her. The way through the desert was not annihilated;
the path remained stony and sore to the feet, but it was accompanied
to the end by a sweet stream to which she could turn aside, and from
which she could obtain refreshment and strength.
Just about the time that we began our meetings near Drury Lane, I heard
that Clem was dead; that he had died abroad. I knew nothing more;
I thought about him and his wife perhaps for a day, but I had parted
from both long ago, and I went on with my work.
CHAPTER V - WHAT IT ALL CAME TO
For two years or thereabouts, M’Kay and myself continued our labours
in the Drury Lane neighbourhood. There is a proverb that it is
the first step which is the most difficult in the achievement of any
object, and the proverb has been altered by ascribing the main part
of the difficulty to the last step. Neither the first nor the
last has been the difficult step with me, but rather what lies between.
The first is usually helped by the excitement and the promise of new
beginnings, and the last by the prospect of triumph; but the intermediate
path is unassisted by enthusiasm, and it is here we are so likely to
faint. M’Kay nevertheless persevered, supporting me, who
otherwise might have been tempted to despair, and at the end of the
two years we were still at our posts. We had, however, learned
something. We had learned that we could not make the slightest
impression on Drury Lane proper. Now and then an idler, or sometimes
a dozen, lounged in, but what was said was strange to them; they were
out of their own world as completely as if they were in another planet,
and all our efforts to reach them by simplicity of statement and by
talking about things which we supposed would interest them utterly failed.
I did not know, till I came in actual contact with them, how far away
the classes which lie at the bottom of great cities are from those above
them; how completely they are inaccessible to motives which act upon
ordinary human beings, and how deeply they are sunk beyond ray of sun
or stars, immersed in the selfishness naturally begotten of their incessant
struggle for existence and the incessant warfare with society.
It was an awful thought to me, ever present on those Sundays, and haunting
me at other times, that men, women, and children were living in such
brutish degradation, and that as they died others would take their place.
Our civilisation seemed nothing but a thin film or crust lying over
a volcanic pit, and I often wondered whether some day the pit would
not break up through it and destroy us all. Great towns are answerable
for the creation and maintenance of the masses of dark, impenetrable,
subterranean blackguardism, with which we became acquainted. The
filthy gloom of the sky, the dirt of the street, the absence of fresh
air, the herding of the poor into huge districts which cannot be opened
up by those who would do good, are tremendous agencies of corruption
which are active at such a rate that it is appalling to reflect what
our future will be if the accumulation of population be not checked.
To stand face to face with the insoluble is not pleasant. A man
will do anything rather than confess it is beyond him. He will
create pleasant fictions, and fancy a possible escape here and there,
but this problem of Drury Lane was round and hard like a ball of adamant.
The only thing I could do was faintly, and I was about to say stupidly,
hope - for I had no rational, tangible grounds for hoping - that some
force of which we are not now aware might some day develop itself which
will be able to resist and remove the pressure which sweeps and crushes
into a hell, sealed from the upper air, millions of human souls every
year in one quarter of the globe alone.
M’Kay’s dreams therefore were not realised, and yet it would
be a mistake to say that they ended in nothing. It often happens
that a grand attempt, although it may fail - miserably fail - is fruitful
in the end and leaves a result, not the hoped for result it is true,
but one which would never have been attained without it. A youth
strives after the impossible, and he is apt to break his heart because
he has never even touched it, but nevertheless his whole life is the
sweeter for the striving; and the archer who aims at a mark a hundred
yards away will send his arrow further than he who sets his bow and
his arm for fifty yards. So it was with M’Kay. He
did not convert Drury Lane, but he saved two or three. One man
whom we came to know was a labourer in Somerset House, a kind of coal
porter employed in carrying coals into the offices there from the cellars
below, and in other menial duties. He had about fifteen or sixteen
shillings a week, and as the coals must necessarily be in the different
rooms before ten o’clock in the morning, he began work early,
and was obliged to live within an easy distance of the Strand.
This man had originally been a small tradesman in a country town.
He was honest, but he never could or never would push his trade in any
way. He was fond of all kinds of little mechanical contrivings,
disliked his shop, and ought to have been a carpenter or cabinet-maker
- not as a master but as a journeyman, for he had no ability whatever
to control men or direct large operations. He was married, and
a sense of duty to his wife - he fortunately had no children - induced
him to stand or sit behind his counter with regularity, but people would
not come to buy of him, because he never seemed to consider their buying
as any favour conferred on him; and thus he became gradually displaced
by his more energetic or more obsequious rivals. In the end he
was obliged to put up his shutters. Unhappily for him, he had
never been a very ardent attendant at any of the places of religious
worship in the town, and he had therefore no organisation to help him.
Not being master of any craft, he was in a pitiable plight, and was
slowly sinking, when he applied to the solicitor of the political party
for which he had always voted to assist him. The solicitor applied
to the member, and the member, much regretting the difficulty of obtaining
places for grown-up men, and explaining the pressure upon the Treasury,
wrote to say that the only post at his disposal was that of labourer.
He would have liked to offer a messengership, but the Treasury had hundreds
of applications from great people who wished to dispose of favourite
footmen whose services they no longer required. Our friend Taylor
had by this time been brought very low, or he would have held out for
something better, but there was nothing to be done. He was starving,
and he therefore accepted; came to London; got a room, one room only,
near Clare Market, and began his new duties. He was able to pick
up a shilling or two more weekly by going on errands for the clerks
during his slack time in the day, so that altogether on the average
he made up about eighteen shillings. Wandering about the Clare
Market region on Sunday he found us out, came in, and remained constant.
Naturally, as we had so few adherents, we gradually knew these few very
intimately, and Taylor would often spend a holiday or part of the Sunday
with us. He was not eminent for anything in particular, and an
educated man, selecting as his friends those only who stand for something,
would not have taken the slightest notice of him. He had read
nothing particular, and thought nothing particular - he was indeed one
of the masses - but in this respect different, that he had not the tendency
to association, aggregation, or clanship which belong to the masses
generally. He was different, of course, in all his ways from his
neighbours born and bred to Clare Market and its alleys. Although
commonplace, he had demands made upon him for an endurance by no means
commonplace, and he had sorrows which were as exquisite as those of
his betters. He did not much resent his poverty. To that
I think he would have submitted, and in fact he did submit to it cheerfully.
What rankled in him was the brutal disregard of him at the office.
He was a servant of servants. The messengers, who themselves were
exposed to all the petty tyrannies of the clerks, and dared not reply,
were Taylor’s masters, and sought a compensation for their own
serfdom by making his ten times worse. The head messenger, who
had been a butler, swore at him, and if Taylor had “answered”
he would have been reported. He had never been a person of much
importance, but at least he had been independent, and it was a new experience
for him to feel that he was a thing fit for nothing but to be cuffed
and cursed. Upon this point he used to get eloquent - as eloquent
as he could be, for he had small power of expression, and he would describe
to me the despair which came over him down in those dark vaults at the
prospect of life continuing after this fashion, and with not the minutest
gleam of light even at the very end. Nobody ever cared to know
the most ordinary facts about him. Nobody inquired whether he
was married or single; nobody troubled himself when he was ill.
If he was away, his pay was stopped; and when he returned to work nobody
asked if he was better. Who can wonder that at first, when he
was an utter stranger in a strange land, he was overcome by the situation,
and that the world was to him a dungeon worse than that of Chillon?
Who can wonder that he was becoming reckless? A little more of
such a life would have transformed him into a brute. He had not
the ability to become revolutionary, or it would have made him a conspirator.
Suffering of any kind is hard to bear, but the suffering which especially
damages character is that which is caused by the neglect or oppression
of man. At any rate it was so in Taylor’s case. I
believe that he would have been patient under any inevitable ordinance
of nature, but he could not lie still under contempt, the knowledge
that to those about him he was of less consequence than the mud under
their feet. He was timid and, after his failure as a shopkeeper,
and the near approach to the workhouse, he dreaded above everything
being again cast adrift. Strange conflict arose in him, for the
insults to which he was exposed drove him almost to madness; and yet
the dread of dismissal in a moment checked him when he was about to
“fire up,” as he called it, and reduced him to a silence
which was torture. Once he was ordered to bring some coals for
the messenger’s lobby. The man who gave him the order, finding
that he was a long time bringing them, went to the top of the stairs,
and bawled after him with an oath to make haste. The reason of
the delay was that Taylor had two loads to bring up - one for somebody
else. When he got to the top of the steps, the messenger with
another oath took the coals, and saying that he “would teach him
to skulk there again,” kicked the other coal-scuttle down to the
bottom. Taylor himself told me this; and yet, although he would
have rejoiced if the man had dropped down dead, and would willingly
have shot him, he was dumb. The check operated in an instant.
He saw himself without a penny, and in the streets. He went down
into the cellar, and raged and wept for an hour. Had he been a
workman, he would probably have throttled his enemy, or tried to do
it, or what is more likely, his enemy would not have dared to treat
him in such fashion, but he was powerless, and once losing his situation
he would have sunk down into the gutter, whence he would have been swept
by the parish into the indiscriminate heap of London pauperism, and
carted away to the Union, a conclusion which was worse to him than being
hung.
Another of our friends was a waiter in one of the public-houses and
chop-houses combined, of which there are so many in the Strand.
He lived in a wretched alley which ran from St. Clement’s Church
to Boswell Court - I have forgotten its name - a dark crowded passage.
He was a man of about sixty - invariably called John, without the addition
of any surname. I knew him long before we opened our room, for
I was in the habit of frequently visiting the chop-house in which he
served. His hours were incredible. He began at nine o’clock
in the morning with sweeping the dining-room, cleaning the tables and
the gas globes, and at twelve business commenced with early luncheons.
Not till three-quarters of an hour after midnight could he leave, for
the house was much used by persons who supped there after the theatres.
During almost the whole of this time he was on his legs, and very often
he was unable to find two minutes in the day in which to get his dinner.
Sundays, however, were free. John was not a head waiter, but merely
a subordinate, and I never knew why at his time of life he had not risen
to a better position. He used to say that “things had been
against him,” and I had no right to seek for further explanations.
He was married, and had had three children, of whom one only was living
- a boy of ten years old, whom he hoped to get into the public-house
as a potboy for a beginning. Like Taylor, the world had well-nigh
overpowered John entirely - crushed him out of all shape, so that what
he was originally, or might have been, it was almost impossible to tell.
There was no particular character left in him. He may once have
been this or that, but every angle now was knocked off, as it is knocked
off from the rounded pebbles which for ages have been dragged up and
down the beach by the waves. For a lifetime he had been exposed
to all sorts of whims and caprices, generally speaking of the most unreasonable
kind, and he had become so trained to take everything without remonstrance
or murmuring that every cross in his life came to him as a chop alleged
by an irritated customer to be raw or done to a cinder. Poor wretch!
he had one trouble, however, which he could not accept with such equanimity,
or rather with such indifference. His wife was a drunkard.
This was an awful trial to him. The worst consequence was that
his boy knew that his mother got drunk. The neighbours kindly
enough volunteered to look after the little man when he was not at school,
and they waylaid him and gave him dinner when his mother was intoxicated;
but frequently he was the first when he returned to find out that there
was nothing for him to eat, and many a time he got up at night as late
as twelve o’clock, crawled downstairs, and went off to his father
to tell him that “she was very bad, and he could not go to sleep.”
The father, then, had to keep his son in the Strand till it was time
to close, take him back, and manage in the best way he could.
Over and over again was he obliged to sit by this wretched woman’s
bedside till breakfast time, and then had to go to work as usual.
Let anybody who has seen a case of this kind say whether the State ought
not to provide for the relief of such men as John, and whether he ought
not to have been able to send his wife away to some institution where
she might have been tended and restrained from destroying, not merely
herself, but her husband and her child. John hardly bore up under
this sorrow. A man may endure much, provided he knows that he
will be well supported when his day’s toil is over; but if the
help for which he looks fails, he falls. Oh those weary days in
that dark back dining-room, from which not a square inch of sky was
visible! weary days haunted by a fear that while he was there unknown
mischief was being done! weary days, whose close nevertheless he dreaded!
Beaten down, baffled, disappointed, if we are in tolerable health we
can contrive to live on some almost impossible chance, some most distant
flicker of hope. It is astonishing how minute a crack in the heavy
uniform cloud will relieve us; but when with all our searching we can
see nothing, then at last we sink. Such was John’s case
when I first came to know him. He attracted me rather, and bit
by bit he confided his story to me. He found out that I might
be trusted, and that I could sympathise, and he told me what he had
never told to anybody before. I was curious to discover whether
religion had done anything for him, and I put the question to him in
an indirect way. His answer was that “some on ’em
say there’s a better world where everything will be put right,
but somehow it seemed too good to be true.” That was his
reason for disbelief, and heaven had not the slightest effect on him.
He found out the room, and was one of our most constant friends.
Another friend was of a totally different type. His name was Cardinal.
He was a Yorkshireman, broad-shouldered, ruddy in the face, short-necked,
inclined apparently to apoplexy, and certainly to passion. He
was a commercial traveller in the cloth trade, and as he had the southern
counties for his district, London was his home when he was not upon
his journeys. His wife was a curious contrast to him. She
was dark-haired, pinched-up, thin-lipped, and always seemed as if she
suffered from some chronic pain or gnawing - not sufficient to make
her ill, but sufficient to make her miserable. They had no children.
Cardinal in early life had been a member of an orthodox Dissenting congregation,
but he had fallen away. He had nobody to guide him, and the position
into which he fell was peculiar. He never busied himself about
religion or philosophy; indeed he had had no training which would have
led him to take an interest in abstract questions, but he read all kinds
of romances and poetry without any order and upon no system. He
had no discriminating faculty, and mixed up together the most heterogeneous
mass of trumpery novels, F