Subject: ncftp missing

From: "Frank Neumann" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 21:49:16 +0200 (MET DST)

Hi,
I just checked the current situation under unstable/binary-m68k,
and it looks as if Michael has done a pretty nice job there.
Only one thing: I did not find 'ncftp-2.3.0-2.m68k.deb' there,
but it must have been uploaded some time earlier because I had once
mirrored it to a local site. :-) 
So, if it got lost during the re-arrangements, the port maintainer
of ncftp might want to re-upload it (Hartmut?).

Frank

---

From: Michael Schmitz <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 10:06:38 +0200 (MET DST)

> mirrored it to a local site. :-) 

It has _not_ been lost, but can be found in the section 'non-free' (as 
opposed to 'unstable'). At least that's what I found in the control 
fields, ok?

> of ncftp might want to re-upload it (Hartmut?).

Maybe you can check if it's really correctly placed in non-free? I didn't 
look it up in the i386 tree ...

	Michael

---

From: Juergen Menden <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 08:11:50 +0200 (MET DST)

> and it looks as if Michael has done a pretty nice job there.

yes.

> mirrored it to a local site. :-) 

i've said to Michael that he should simply delete packages which
make too much problems, maybe ncftp is one of them. Michael?

anyway, i think everyone should check if his uploads are correctly
moved and whether it's still the latest version. 

jjm

-- 
Juergen Menden                   | Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by me, 
tel:    +49 (89) 289 - 22387     +-----------+ are (usually) not the opinions 
e-mail: [email-masked]     | of anyone else on this planet.

Hi! I'm a .signature virus!  Add me to your .signature and join in the fun!

---

From: Juergen Menden <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 10:20:27 +0200 (MET DST)

> look it up in the i386 tree ...

the source is in non-free, so it-s correct.

jjm