Subject: netpbmdevel-1994.03.01p1-1

From: "James A. Robinson" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 19:04:07 -0400

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Date: 30 Jun 96 22:33 UT
Format: 1.5
Distribution: unstable
Priority: Low
Maintainer: Jim Robinson <[email-masked]>
Source: netpbmdevel
Version: 1994.03.01p1-1
Binary:  netpbmdevel
Architecture:  i386
Description: 
 netpbmdevel: Netpbm development libraries and header files.
Changes: First upload. This is a split-off from netpbm proper.

---

From: Amos Shapira <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 1996 07:29:22 +0300

In message <m0uaVXF-0002DXC@plato> you write:
|
|-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
|Date: 30 Jun 96 22:33 UT
|Format: 1.5
|Distribution: unstable
|Priority: Low
|Maintainer: Jim Robinson <[email-masked]>
|Source: netpbmdevel

Wouldn't it be more conformant to call this package netpbm-dev?
I think it makes things a little more readable.

(Just to keep in line with the libs, for instance)

Cheers,

--Amos

--Amos Shapira                    | "Of course Australia was marked for
133 Shlomo Ben-Yosef st.          |  glory, for its people had been chosen
Jerusalem 93 805                  |  by the finest judges in England."
ISRAEL             [email-masked] |                     -- Anonymous