Subject: Re: Organizing "non-free"

From: [email-masked] (Bruce Perens)
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 96 10:56 PDT

> Umm, "non-free to distribute" shouldn't be on /any/ ftp site, right?

No, there are too many shades of this. Ask Dale about the new Pine/Pico
license.

	Bruce

---

From: Miquel van Smoorenburg <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 1996 20:08:49 +0200 (MET DST)

> No, there are too many shades of this. Ask Dale about the new Pine/Pico

Also, while on the subject, should "non-free" be renamed to
"buzz-nonfree" or "rex-nonfree" and frozen at the release,
just like the "normal distribution? The same for contrib, ofcourse.
Uhm and what about non-free-stable, non-free-unstable, contrib-stable
etc symlinks?

Perhaps the non-free directory should be moved into "rex" so that
is is part of the distribution itself wrt release engineering etc?

Mike.
-- 
  Miquel van    | Cistron Internet Services   --    Alphen aan den Rijn.
  Smoorenburg,  | mailto:[email-masked]          http://www.cistron.nl/
[email-masked] | Tel: +31-172-419445 (Voice) 430979 (Fax) 442580 (Data)