Subject: Re: Bug#4378: incomplete Packages files and incomplete distributions

From: Bdale Garbee <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 1996 17:47:05 -0600

In article <[email-masked]> you wrote:
: Why not just have rex-non-free rex-contrib and rex, etc.

I suppose this would be ok, but my own reasonableness trigger would jitter
less if it were something more like

	rex/free
	rex/non-free
	rex/contrib

You end up with fewer symlinks for the 'stable' and 'unstable' pseudo-trees,
too.

Bdale

---

From: Rob Browning <[email-masked]>
Date: 02 Sep 1996 19:00:46 -0500

> You end up with fewer symlinks for the 'stable' and 'unstable' pseudo-trees,

Fine with me, and I think that still answers the CD-presser's
concerns.  Are we actually considering this, or is it just an academic
exercise?

--
Rob