Subject: Re: fd dev

From: Pietrak Rafal <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 92 14:09:24 +0100

Tough, I'd prefere having not more then a screenfull in every dir, if
hierarchical /dev breaks important and none-trivial programs, well,...
so let there be flat /dev directory. (BTW, I liked UNIX a lot -- and
Linux in particular -- but here both lost a bit of my hart).

As for the block devices naming, I would prefere naming scheme like:
/dev/[A][N][A][N]..., where S is [a-z] (may be [A-Z], too) strings, and
N is [0-9] strings, that is numbers.

          - Rafal