From Lesta@t-online.de  Wed May 26 08:06:40 1999
Received: from mailout06.btx.dtag.de (mailout06.btx.dtag.de [194.25.2.154])
	by swi.swi.psy.uva.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA04823
	for <prolog@swi.psy.uva.nl>; Wed, 26 May 1999 08:06:39 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fwd00.btx.dtag.de ([194.25.2.160])
	by mailout06.btx.dtag.de with smtp 
	id 10mWpp-0007Wv-00; Wed, 26 May 1999 08:06:37 +0200
Received: from t-online.de (05121269112-0001(btxid)@[62.158.101.110]) 
	by fwd00.btx.dtag.de with smtp
	id <m10mWpn-0006AiC>; Wed, 26 May 1999 08:06:35 +0200
Message-ID: <374B8EF0.9E911184@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 08:04:32 +0200
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [de]C-DT  (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: swi prolog mailing list <prolog@swi.psy.uva.nl>
Subject: Re: FATAL ERRORs
References: <Pine.LNX.4.00.9905251723090.28843-100000@blackcat.cat.syr.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Sender: 05121269112-0001@t-online.de
From: Lesta@t-online.de (Uwe Lesta)

Fred Dushin schrieb:

> Anyone have any ideas about how to diagnose FATAL ERRORs
... <snip> 
> Is SWI known to be robust under heavy loads?

I observed something similar on the linux KDE environment.
There I consult a factbases from 5 Mbyte and the prolog system crash.
IMHO it is a KDE bug, cause on fvwm and win98 it work fine.


Regards

Uwe
Lesta@t-online.de

