From moeller@ebi.ac.uk Thu May 31 20:43:52 2001
Received: from alpha1.ebi.ac.uk (alpha1.ebi.ac.uk [193.62.196.122])
	by swi.psy.uva.nl (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f4VIhp306939
	for <prolog@swi.psy.uva.nl>; Thu, 31 May 2001 20:43:51 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from kandor.ebi.ac.uk (IDENT:moeller@kandor.ebi.ac.uk [193.62.199.202])
	by alpha1.ebi.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA91970;
	Thu, 31 May 2001 19:43:43 +0100 (BST)
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 19:43:43 +0100 (BST)
From: Steffen Moeller <moeller@ebi.ac.uk>
To: "Noord G.J.M. van" <vannoord@let.rug.nl>
cc: SWI Prolog Mailing list <prolog@swi.psy.uva.nl>
Subject: Re: [SWIPL] another question
In-Reply-To: <15126.36805.945965.536306@gudrun.let.rug.nl>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0105311941160.9689-100000@kandor.ebi.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


I have to excuse to Partsakoulakis, indeed - hey - sorry!

On Thu, 31 May 2001, Noord G.J.M. van wrote:

> Steffen Moeller writes:
>  >
>  > I'm (a bit) afraid to say that I think your concept on what Prolog is
>  > needs a quick review.
> or perhaps yours
Yip.

It was both a bit harsh and - worse still - stupid. I did not mean it as
it reads.

Steffen

