From jan@swi.psy.uva.nl Wed Sep 26 16:29:45 2001
Received: from gollem.swi.psy.uva.nl (root@gollem [145.18.152.30])
	by swi.psy.uva.nl (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f8QETjv29298;
	Wed, 26 Sep 2001 16:29:45 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]])
	by gollem.swi.psy.uva.nl (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) id f8QETjE19514;
	Wed, 26 Sep 2001 16:29:45 +0200
From: Jan Wielemaker <jan@swi.psy.uva.nl>
Organization: SWI, University of Amsterdam
To: Chris R Roast <C.R.Roast@shu.ac.uk>, prolog@swi.psy.uva.nl
Subject: Re: [SWIPL] SWIPL - winnt -v- win98 and qsave
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 16:26:25 +0200
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29.2]
Content-Type: text/plain
References: <200108201051.LAA14594@holly.shu.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <200108201051.LAA14594@holly.shu.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <0109261629450W.15353@gollem>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Chris R Roast wrote:
>I've an SWI prolog based tool with an XPCE GUI. The tool saves itself using:
>
>  qsave_program(x,[goal(top),autoload(true),op(save)])
>
>On WinNT this gives x.exe which run's fine. However, when run and save on
>Win98, the x.exe generates:
>
>[FATAL ERROR 
>loadPart(): QLF format error at index = 112]

Interesting.  Anyone else with this problem?  I don't have a machine
with ready-to-run debugging environment for Windows 98 at hand, so
I like to know a bit more before digging.  If installation paths are
the same, the x.exe should be the same.  Is that true?  Does the
NT x.exe run on Windows 98?  The other way around?

	Thanks for any pointers

		--- Jan

