From bparsia@email.unc.edu Sat Nov  3 22:59:46 2001
Received: from smtpsrv1.isis.unc.edu (smtpsrv1.isis.unc.edu [152.2.1.138])
	by swi.psy.uva.nl (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id fA3Lxjt28496
	for <prolog@swi.psy.uva.nl>; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 22:59:45 +0100 (MET)
Received: from login8.isis.unc.edu (bparsia@login8.isis.unc.edu [152.2.1.105])
	by smtpsrv1.isis.unc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA27982
	for <prolog@swi.psy.uva.nl>; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 16:59:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from bparsia@localhost)
	by login8.isis.unc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA47290;
	Sat, 3 Nov 2001 16:59:42 -0500
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 16:59:42 -0500 (EST)
From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@email.unc.edu>
X-Sender: bparsia@login8.isis.unc.edu
To: prolog@swi.psy.uva.nl
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.21L1.0111031655270.43784-100000@login8.isis.unc.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: [SWIPL] [BUG] rdf_db declares bad rdfs namespace

>From what I can tell, the RDF schema namespace is
	http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#

whereas rdf_db.pl declares it thusly:
	ns(rdfs, 'http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/PR-rdf-schema-19990303#').

And a comment on namespace management:

I really really don't like the permanacy of namespace declarations. Ok, it
drives me nuts, especially when I make a typo at the command line
:) However, I do agree that rouge namespaces declarations and
redefinitions can be disasterous. Perhaps namespaces should be declared on
a per module basis?

Cheers,
Bijan Parsia.

